mirror of
https://github.com/Sea-Haven-Industries/open-swe.git
synced 2026-10-02 22:43:27 +00:00
834efbc33c
* feat: tighten reviewer eval workflow Require the reviewer to verify and dedupe findings before recording them, and make benchmark runs safe to execute against deployed reviewer graphs without posting GitHub reviews. * chore: move reviewer eval settings to config Load reviewer benchmark settings from the default eval config file so deployed eval runs do not require a wide CLI surface. * feat: allow reviewer eval model overrides Pass reviewer model and reasoning effort from the eval config into reviewer runs so isolated benchmark deployments can test Opus 4.7 high thinking. * fix: use adaptive thinking for Opus 4.7 Switch Opus 4.7 model overrides to Anthropic adaptive thinking with effort instead of the deprecated budgeted thinking payload rejected by the API. * refactor: use latest Anthropic effort API Remove legacy Anthropic budget-token thinking support and route Anthropic efforts through adaptive thinking plus effort. * revert prompting
85 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
85 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# Reviewer Eval
|
||
|
||
Offline LangSmith eval for the Open SWE Reviewer graph against the 50 PRs from
|
||
`withmartian/code-review-benchmark`. See `REVIEWER_EVAL_PLAN.md` at the repo
|
||
root for the full design.
|
||
|
||
## Layout
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
evals/reviewer/
|
||
├── golden_comments/ # 50 PRs × golden comments (copied from martian benchmark)
|
||
├── build_dataset.py # martian JSON → LangSmith dataset (resolves SHAs via gh)
|
||
├── config.toml # default benchmark run config
|
||
├── judge.py # claude-opus-4-5 pairwise match evaluator + aggregate
|
||
├── target.py # invokes the reviewer graph over langgraph_sdk
|
||
└── run_eval.py # client.aevaluate entrypoint
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Prerequisites
|
||
|
||
- `LANGSMITH_API_KEY` set in your env.
|
||
- `gh` authenticated (`gh auth status`) — needed for `build_dataset.py`.
|
||
- `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` set — judge runs `claude-opus-4-5`.
|
||
- A running reviewer graph (local `langgraph dev` or deployed assistant id) with
|
||
`REVIEWER_ASSISTANT_ID` env var pointing at it. Defaults to assistant `reviewer`
|
||
on `http://localhost:2024`.
|
||
|
||
## 1. Build the dataset (once)
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Dry run — writes evals/reviewer/dataset_dryrun.json without uploading
|
||
uv run python -m evals.reviewer.build_dataset --dry-run
|
||
|
||
# Upload for real
|
||
uv run python -m evals.reviewer.build_dataset --dataset-name openswe-reviewer-v1
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Each example carries: `repo`, `pr_number`, `pr_url`, `base_sha`, `head_sha`,
|
||
`base_ref`, `head_ref`, `pr_title`. The dataset is frozen at upload time —
|
||
upstream PR drift can't invalidate it.
|
||
|
||
## 2. Run the eval
|
||
|
||
The reviewer graph must be running and accept a `pr` input matching the
|
||
example schema, and must emit a `submit_review` tool call (or set
|
||
`state["review"]["comments"]`) with `[{file, line, severity, body}, ...]`.
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
uv run python -m evals.reviewer.run_eval
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Smoke-test with 3 PRs first:
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
uv run python -m evals.reviewer.run_eval --limit 3
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The runner reads benchmark settings from `evals/reviewer/config.toml`. Set the
|
||
deployment URL there (or leave it blank to use `LANGGRAPH_URL` / local dev).
|
||
The target sets `reviewer_eval` for every run, so `publish_review` does not post
|
||
to GitHub.
|
||
|
||
By default the judge scores final `add_finding` calls. Set
|
||
`score_mode = "surfaced_findings"` in the config to score only findings that
|
||
would pass the production threshold/cap.
|
||
|
||
`model_id` and `reasoning_effort` in the config are passed to the reviewer run,
|
||
so isolated benchmark deployments can test a specific model/effort without
|
||
changing deployment-wide defaults.
|
||
|
||
## Comparing against Devin Review
|
||
|
||
Both tools are scored on the same 50 PRs with the same judge model
|
||
(`claude-opus-4-5`) and the same judge prompt (verbatim from martian
|
||
`step3_judge_comments.py`). Pull martian's published Devin numbers from their
|
||
dashboard and compare against the LangSmith experiment's `micro_*` /
|
||
`macro_*` summary metrics.
|
||
|
||
## Notes
|
||
|
||
- No GitHub forks needed — both upstream repos and martian's benchmark forks
|
||
(`ai-code-review-evaluation/*`) are public.
|
||
- `judge_match` charges judge LLM tokens proportional to
|
||
`n_candidates × n_goldens` per example. For 50 PRs with ~3 goldens each and
|
||
agents emitting ~10 candidates, expect ~1500 judge calls per experiment.
|