open-swe/evals/reviewer/run_eval.py

412 lines
13 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

"""Run the reviewer eval against the LangSmith dataset.
Usage:
uv run python -m evals.reviewer.run_eval
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import asyncio
import contextlib
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
import logging
import os
import sys
import threading
import tomllib
from collections.abc import Iterable, Mapping
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Literal, TypedDict
from dotenv import load_dotenv
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
from langgraph_sdk import get_client
from langsmith import Client, aevaluate
from langsmith.schemas import Example
refactor: consolidate reviewer modules into agent/review/ Part of the domain-reorg adoption (build plan step C2): fork content, upstream layout. Nine 1:1 module moves (reviewer_diff/eval_store/ findings/groups/publish/reconcile/trace_context + review_style_ collector/guidance) into agent/review/, with internal relative imports re-wired to the new package depth. agent/review/__init__.py mirrors upstream's thin re-export shim (one of the 21 verified "A" structural adds). Rewrote the 38 grep hits across importer files (agent/{analyzer, ci_autofix,reviewer,webapp}.py, agent/dashboard/*, agent/middleware/ settle_review_check.py, agent/tools/*, agent/utils/github_feedback.py, agent/webhooks/github.py, evals/reviewer/*, and the reviewer test suite) to point at agent.review.*; 4 of the 38 hits were name collisions (list_reviewer_findings, reviewer_outcomes, _reviewer_thread_id, reviewer_thread_id — not the moved modules) and were left untouched. tests/test_github_checks.py's module-alias import (`from agent import reviewer_publish`) follows upstream's own `from agent.review import publish as reviewer_publish` pattern so downstream `reviewer_publish.*` call sites needed no changes. agent/reviewer.py and agent/webapp.py stay in place per the hard rule (fork content, import-only rewire) and are not part of this package. Gates: ruff check + ruff format --check, pytest --co -q (1637 collected), full unit suite (1637 passed), and the reviewer/findings suite in isolation (pytest -k "review or finding", 421 passed).
2026-07-17 13:52:03 -04:00
from agent.review.eval_store import _EXPERIMENT_URL_RE, _LOG_TAIL_CHARS
from agent.review.findings import REVIEW_FINDING_CAP
from evals.reviewer.judge import aggregate_pr, judge_match
from evals.reviewer.store_reporter import StoreReporter, is_enabled
from evals.reviewer.target import (
drain_thread_ids,
get_completed_count,
get_langgraph_url,
review_pr,
)
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
CONFIG_PATH = Path(__file__).with_name("config.toml")
DEFAULT_LANGSMITH_PROJECT = "open-swe-evals"
ScoreMode = Literal["all_findings", "surfaced_findings"]
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
Severity = Literal["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
_VALID_SCORE_MODES: set[str] = {"all_findings", "surfaced_findings"}
_VALID_SEVERITIES: set[str] = {"low", "medium", "high", "critical"}
_ENV_MAPPING: dict[str, str] = {
"dataset_name": "REVIEWER_EVAL_DATASET_NAME",
"experiment_prefix": "REVIEWER_EVAL_EXPERIMENT_PREFIX",
"max_concurrency": "REVIEWER_EVAL_MAX_CONCURRENCY",
"langgraph_url": "LANGGRAPH_URL",
"langsmith_project": "LANGSMITH_PROJECT",
"assistant_id": "REVIEWER_ASSISTANT_ID",
"model_id": "REVIEWER_EVAL_MODEL_ID",
"reasoning_effort": "REVIEWER_EVAL_REASONING_EFFORT",
"score_mode": "REVIEWER_EVAL_SCORE_MODE",
"severity_threshold": "REVIEWER_EVAL_SEVERITY_THRESHOLD",
"cap": "REVIEWER_EVAL_CAP",
}
class ReviewerEvalConfig(TypedDict, total=False):
dataset_name: str
experiment_prefix: str
max_concurrency: int
langgraph_url: str
langsmith_project: str
assistant_id: str
model_id: str
reasoning_effort: str
score_mode: ScoreMode
severity_threshold: Severity
cap: int
DEFAULT_CONFIG: ReviewerEvalConfig = {
"dataset_name": "openswe-reviewer-v1",
"experiment_prefix": "openswe-reviewer-baseline",
"max_concurrency": 5,
"langgraph_url": "",
"langsmith_project": DEFAULT_LANGSMITH_PROJECT,
"assistant_id": "reviewer",
"model_id": "google_genai:gemini-3.5-flash",
"reasoning_effort": "medium",
"score_mode": "surfaced_findings",
"severity_threshold": "low",
"cap": REVIEW_FINDING_CAP,
}
def _parse_int(value: str) -> int | None:
try:
return int(value)
except ValueError:
return None
def _load_config() -> ReviewerEvalConfig:
if not CONFIG_PATH.exists():
return {}
with CONFIG_PATH.open("rb") as f:
raw = tomllib.load(f)
return _coerce_config(raw)
def _coerce_config(raw: dict[str, Any]) -> ReviewerEvalConfig:
config: ReviewerEvalConfig = {}
dataset_name = raw.get("dataset_name")
if isinstance(dataset_name, str) and dataset_name:
config["dataset_name"] = dataset_name
experiment_prefix = raw.get("experiment_prefix")
if isinstance(experiment_prefix, str) and experiment_prefix:
config["experiment_prefix"] = experiment_prefix
langgraph_url = raw.get("langgraph_url")
if isinstance(langgraph_url, str) and langgraph_url:
config["langgraph_url"] = langgraph_url
langsmith_project = raw.get("langsmith_project")
if isinstance(langsmith_project, str) and langsmith_project:
config["langsmith_project"] = langsmith_project
assistant_id = raw.get("assistant_id")
if isinstance(assistant_id, str) and assistant_id:
config["assistant_id"] = assistant_id
model_id = raw.get("model_id")
if isinstance(model_id, str) and model_id:
config["model_id"] = model_id
reasoning_effort = raw.get("reasoning_effort")
if isinstance(reasoning_effort, str) and reasoning_effort:
config["reasoning_effort"] = reasoning_effort
max_concurrency = raw.get("max_concurrency")
if isinstance(max_concurrency, int) and max_concurrency > 0:
config["max_concurrency"] = max_concurrency
score_mode = raw.get("score_mode")
if score_mode in _VALID_SCORE_MODES:
config["score_mode"] = score_mode
severity_threshold = raw.get("severity_threshold")
if severity_threshold in _VALID_SEVERITIES:
config["severity_threshold"] = severity_threshold
cap = raw.get("cap")
if isinstance(cap, int) and cap >= 0:
config["cap"] = cap
return config
def _load_env_config(env: Mapping[str, str] = os.environ) -> ReviewerEvalConfig:
raw: dict[str, Any] = {}
for config_key, env_key in _ENV_MAPPING.items():
value = env.get(env_key)
if value is None or value == "":
continue
if config_key in {"max_concurrency", "cap"}:
parsed = _parse_int(value)
if parsed is not None:
raw[config_key] = parsed
else:
raw[config_key] = value
return _coerce_config(raw)
def _config_from_args(args: argparse.Namespace) -> ReviewerEvalConfig:
raw: dict[str, Any] = {}
for key in _ENV_MAPPING:
value = getattr(args, key, None)
if value is not None:
raw[key] = value
return _coerce_config(raw)
def _resolve_config(cli_config: ReviewerEvalConfig | None = None) -> ReviewerEvalConfig:
resolved: ReviewerEvalConfig = {
**DEFAULT_CONFIG,
**_load_config(),
**_load_env_config(),
}
if cli_config is not None:
resolved.update(cli_config)
return resolved
def _apply_config_to_env(config: ReviewerEvalConfig) -> None:
for config_key, env_key in _ENV_MAPPING.items():
if config_key == "langsmith_project":
continue
value = config.get(config_key)
if value is not None:
os.environ[env_key] = str(value)
_apply_langsmith_project(config.get("langsmith_project"))
def _apply_langsmith_project(project: str | None) -> None:
"""Route eval traces to a dedicated LangSmith project.
``project`` is expected to be the resolved value after CLI/env/config
precedence has already been applied.
"""
resolved = project or os.environ.get("LANGSMITH_PROJECT") or DEFAULT_LANGSMITH_PROJECT
os.environ["LANGSMITH_PROJECT"] = resolved
os.environ["LANGCHAIN_PROJECT"] = resolved
os.environ.setdefault("LANGSMITH_TRACING", "true")
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
class _TailCapture:
"""Thread-safe rolling tail of eval output + the last LangSmith experiment URL."""
def __init__(self) -> None:
self._buf = ""
self._url: str | None = None
self._lock = threading.Lock()
def append(self, text: str) -> None:
if not text:
return
with self._lock:
self._buf = (self._buf + text)[-_LOG_TAIL_CHARS:]
found = _EXPERIMENT_URL_RE.findall(self._buf)
if found:
self._url = found[-1]
def tail(self) -> str | None:
with self._lock:
return self._buf or None
def url(self) -> str | None:
with self._lock:
return self._url
class _BufferingHandler(logging.Handler):
"""Mirror log records into a ``_TailCapture`` so the reporter can publish them."""
def __init__(self, capture: _TailCapture) -> None:
super().__init__()
self._capture = capture
def emit(self, record: logging.LogRecord) -> None:
try:
self._capture.append(self.format(record) + "\n")
except Exception:
pass
class _TeeStream:
"""Write to the original stream and mirror into the capture (for ``print``ed output)."""
def __init__(self, original: Any, capture: _TailCapture) -> None:
self._original = original
self._capture = capture
def write(self, text: str) -> int:
self._capture.append(text)
return self._original.write(text)
def flush(self) -> None:
self._original.flush()
def __getattr__(self, name: str) -> Any:
return getattr(self._original, name)
def _resolve_total(dataset_name: str, data: str | list[Example]) -> int | None:
if isinstance(data, list):
return len(data)
try:
return Client().read_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name).example_count
except Exception:
logger.warning("Could not resolve dataset example count for progress", exc_info=True)
return None
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
async def _cleanup_threads(thread_ids: Iterable[str]) -> None:
"""Delete LangGraph threads created during the eval.
Underlying sandboxes are reclaimed by the provider's TTL — this only
drops the LangGraph checkpoint/metadata records.
"""
sdk = get_client(url=get_langgraph_url())
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
for tid in thread_ids:
try:
await sdk.threads.delete(tid)
except Exception as exc:
logger.warning("Failed to delete thread %s: %s", tid, exc)
async def main() -> None:
logging.basicConfig(
level=os.environ.get("REVIEWER_EVAL_LOG_LEVEL", "INFO"),
format="%(asctime)s %(levelname)s %(name)s: %(message)s",
)
load_dotenv()
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--limit", type=int, default=None, help="Run only the first N examples.")
ap.add_argument("--dataset-name", dest="dataset_name")
ap.add_argument("--experiment-prefix", dest="experiment_prefix")
ap.add_argument("--max-concurrency", dest="max_concurrency", type=int)
ap.add_argument("--langgraph-url", dest="langgraph_url")
ap.add_argument("--langsmith-project", dest="langsmith_project")
ap.add_argument("--assistant-id", dest="assistant_id")
ap.add_argument("--model-id", dest="model_id")
ap.add_argument("--reasoning-effort", dest="reasoning_effort")
ap.add_argument("--score-mode", dest="score_mode", choices=sorted(_VALID_SCORE_MODES))
ap.add_argument(
"--severity-threshold",
dest="severity_threshold",
choices=sorted(_VALID_SEVERITIES),
)
ap.add_argument("--cap", type=int)
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
ap.add_argument(
"--no-cleanup",
action="store_true",
help="Skip deleting LangGraph threads after the experiment finishes.",
)
args = ap.parse_args()
config = _resolve_config(_config_from_args(args))
_apply_config_to_env(config)
dataset_name = config["dataset_name"]
experiment_prefix = config["experiment_prefix"]
max_concurrency = config["max_concurrency"]
logger.info(
"Starting reviewer eval: dataset=%s experiment_prefix=%s max_concurrency=%s "
"model=%s effort=%s score_mode=%s severity_threshold=%s cap=%s project=%s "
"assistant_id=%s langgraph_url=%s limit=%s",
dataset_name,
experiment_prefix,
max_concurrency,
config["model_id"],
config["reasoning_effort"],
config["score_mode"],
config["severity_threshold"],
config["cap"],
config["langsmith_project"],
config["assistant_id"],
config["langgraph_url"] or "(default)",
args.limit,
)
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
data: str | list[Example]
if args.limit:
client = Client()
data = list(client.list_examples(dataset_name=dataset_name, limit=args.limit))
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
else:
data = dataset_name
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
reporter: StoreReporter | None = None
heartbeat: asyncio.Task[None] | None = None
log_handler: logging.Handler | None = None
original_stdout = sys.stdout
if is_enabled():
capture = _TailCapture()
log_handler = _BufferingHandler(capture)
log_handler.setFormatter(
logging.Formatter("%(asctime)s %(levelname)s %(name)s: %(message)s")
)
logging.getLogger().addHandler(log_handler)
sys.stdout = _TeeStream(original_stdout, capture)
reporter = StoreReporter(
config=dict(config),
limit=args.limit,
total=_resolve_total(dataset_name, data),
created_by=None,
completed_getter=get_completed_count,
tail_getter=capture.tail,
experiment_url_getter=capture.url,
)
await reporter.start()
heartbeat = reporter.run_heartbeat()
eval_error: BaseException | None = None
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
try:
await aevaluate(
review_pr,
data=data,
evaluators=[judge_match],
summary_evaluators=[aggregate_pr],
experiment_prefix=experiment_prefix,
max_concurrency=max_concurrency,
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
num_repetitions=1,
)
except BaseException as exc:
eval_error = exc
raise
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
finally:
if reporter is not None:
if heartbeat is not None:
heartbeat.cancel()
with contextlib.suppress(asyncio.CancelledError):
await heartbeat
status = "failed" if eval_error is not None else "completed"
error = None if eval_error is None else f"{type(eval_error).__name__}: {eval_error}"
await reporter.finish(status=status, error=error)
if log_handler is not None:
logging.getLogger().removeHandler(log_handler)
sys.stdout = original_stdout
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
if not args.no_cleanup:
thread_ids = drain_thread_ids()
if thread_ids:
logger.info("Cleaning up %d LangGraph threads", len(thread_ids))
await _cleanup_threads(thread_ids)
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())