open-swe/evals/reviewer/run_eval.py

193 lines
6.1 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

"""Run the reviewer eval against the LangSmith dataset.
Usage:
uv run python -m evals.reviewer.run_eval
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
import logging
import os
import tomllib
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
from collections.abc import Iterable
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Literal, TypedDict
from dotenv import load_dotenv
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
from langgraph_sdk import get_client
from langsmith import Client, aevaluate
from langsmith.schemas import Example
from evals.reviewer.judge import aggregate_pr, judge_match
from evals.reviewer.target import drain_thread_ids, get_langgraph_url, review_pr
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
CONFIG_PATH = Path(__file__).with_name("config.toml")
DEFAULT_LANGSMITH_PROJECT = "open-swe-evals"
ScoreMode = Literal["all_findings", "surfaced_findings"]
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
Severity = Literal["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
class ReviewerEvalConfig(TypedDict, total=False):
dataset_name: str
experiment_prefix: str
max_concurrency: int
langgraph_url: str
langsmith_project: str
assistant_id: str
model_id: str
reasoning_effort: str
score_mode: ScoreMode
severity_threshold: Severity
cap: int
def _load_config() -> ReviewerEvalConfig:
if not CONFIG_PATH.exists():
return {}
with CONFIG_PATH.open("rb") as f:
raw = tomllib.load(f)
return _coerce_config(raw)
def _coerce_config(raw: dict[str, Any]) -> ReviewerEvalConfig:
config: ReviewerEvalConfig = {}
dataset_name = raw.get("dataset_name")
if isinstance(dataset_name, str) and dataset_name:
config["dataset_name"] = dataset_name
experiment_prefix = raw.get("experiment_prefix")
if isinstance(experiment_prefix, str) and experiment_prefix:
config["experiment_prefix"] = experiment_prefix
langgraph_url = raw.get("langgraph_url")
if isinstance(langgraph_url, str) and langgraph_url:
config["langgraph_url"] = langgraph_url
langsmith_project = raw.get("langsmith_project")
if isinstance(langsmith_project, str) and langsmith_project:
config["langsmith_project"] = langsmith_project
assistant_id = raw.get("assistant_id")
if isinstance(assistant_id, str) and assistant_id:
config["assistant_id"] = assistant_id
model_id = raw.get("model_id")
if isinstance(model_id, str) and model_id:
config["model_id"] = model_id
reasoning_effort = raw.get("reasoning_effort")
if isinstance(reasoning_effort, str) and reasoning_effort:
config["reasoning_effort"] = reasoning_effort
max_concurrency = raw.get("max_concurrency")
if isinstance(max_concurrency, int) and max_concurrency > 0:
config["max_concurrency"] = max_concurrency
score_mode = raw.get("score_mode")
if score_mode in {"all_findings", "surfaced_findings"}:
config["score_mode"] = score_mode
severity_threshold = raw.get("severity_threshold")
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
if severity_threshold in {"low", "medium", "high", "critical"}:
config["severity_threshold"] = severity_threshold
cap = raw.get("cap")
if isinstance(cap, int) and cap >= 0:
config["cap"] = cap
return config
def _apply_config_to_env(config: ReviewerEvalConfig) -> None:
env_mapping = {
"langgraph_url": "LANGGRAPH_URL",
"assistant_id": "REVIEWER_ASSISTANT_ID",
"model_id": "REVIEWER_EVAL_MODEL_ID",
"reasoning_effort": "REVIEWER_EVAL_REASONING_EFFORT",
"score_mode": "REVIEWER_EVAL_SCORE_MODE",
"severity_threshold": "REVIEWER_EVAL_SEVERITY_THRESHOLD",
"cap": "REVIEWER_EVAL_CAP",
}
for config_key, env_key in env_mapping.items():
value = config.get(config_key)
if value is not None:
os.environ[env_key] = str(value)
_apply_langsmith_project(config.get("langsmith_project"))
def _apply_langsmith_project(project: str | None) -> None:
"""Route eval traces to a dedicated LangSmith project.
A project already set in the environment (e.g. by the admin-triggered job)
wins so callers can override the config default.
"""
resolved = os.environ.get("LANGSMITH_PROJECT") or project or DEFAULT_LANGSMITH_PROJECT
os.environ["LANGSMITH_PROJECT"] = resolved
os.environ["LANGCHAIN_PROJECT"] = resolved
os.environ.setdefault("LANGSMITH_TRACING", "true")
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
async def _cleanup_threads(thread_ids: Iterable[str]) -> None:
"""Delete LangGraph threads created during the eval.
Underlying sandboxes are reclaimed by the provider's TTL — this only
drops the LangGraph checkpoint/metadata records.
"""
sdk = get_client(url=get_langgraph_url())
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
for tid in thread_ids:
try:
await sdk.threads.delete(tid)
except Exception as exc:
logger.warning("Failed to delete thread %s: %s", tid, exc)
async def main() -> None:
load_dotenv()
config = _load_config()
_apply_config_to_env(config)
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--limit", type=int, default=None, help="Run only the first N examples.")
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
ap.add_argument(
"--no-cleanup",
action="store_true",
help="Skip deleting LangGraph threads after the experiment finishes.",
)
args = ap.parse_args()
dataset_name = config.get("dataset_name", "openswe-reviewer-v1")
experiment_prefix = config.get("experiment_prefix", "openswe-reviewer-baseline")
max_concurrency = config.get("max_concurrency", 5)
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
data: str | list[Example]
if args.limit:
client = Client()
data = list(client.list_examples(dataset_name=dataset_name, limit=args.limit))
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
else:
data = dataset_name
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
try:
await aevaluate(
review_pr,
data=data,
evaluators=[judge_match],
summary_evaluators=[aggregate_pr],
experiment_prefix=experiment_prefix,
max_concurrency=max_concurrency,
feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring (#1241) * feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring - New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle, GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via `_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context. - New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with `(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls against golden comments. - `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally *not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged. - `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into the run output. - `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`. - `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via `client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept `max_examples`. - Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work without an activated venv. * resolve comments --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 10:15:58 -07:00
num_repetitions=1,
)
finally:
if not args.no_cleanup:
thread_ids = drain_thread_ids()
if thread_ids:
logger.info("Cleaning up %d LangGraph threads", len(thread_ids))
await _cleanup_threads(thread_ids)
if __name__ == "__main__":
import asyncio
asyncio.run(main())