mirror of
https://github.com/Sea-Haven-Industries/sh-mcp.git
synced 2026-10-07 05:52:03 +00:00
Add tests for the highest-risk surface (build-plan §5, design.md §7.3): tool-hiding, server-side scope enforcement (incl. forced hidden calls), audience binding, input-schema validation, finance redaction on egress, audit emission with hashed args, prompt-injection regression (tool output is data), rate limiting, MCP conformance (in-memory transport round-trip), OpenAPI 3.1 validity, and local-auth safety. Add HTTP integration tests (supertest) for both servers and per-package dev-client tests. 405 tests pass. Wire the coverage gate into vitest.config.ts: 80% overall, with per-file thresholds on the auth + dispatch crown jewels; exclude deferred real client stubs, entrypoints, cdk apps, and aws-only config from the gate (documented). Extend eslint flat config + add .prettierignore to cover servers/. Commit the updated package-lock.json.
447 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript
447 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Unit tests for @sh-mcp/payments tools.
|
|
*
|
|
* All tests use:
|
|
* - A mock AuthContext with finance:read scope (unless testing scope rejection).
|
|
* - A mock PaymentsClient — no real DynamoDB or AWS calls.
|
|
*
|
|
* Coverage targets:
|
|
* - Happy path for each tool
|
|
* - Empty result set
|
|
* - Client error propagation
|
|
* - Throttle / retry simulation (transient error then success)
|
|
* - Scope enforcement: missing scope throws ScopeError
|
|
* - Redaction: bank account, routing, card numbers are masked; vendor names are not
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest';
|
|
import type { AuthContext } from '@sh-mcp/shared';
|
|
import { requireScope } from '@sh-mcp/shared';
|
|
import type { PaymentsClient, Payment } from '../src/client.js';
|
|
import {
|
|
makeLookupByVendorTool,
|
|
makeLookupByInvoiceTool,
|
|
makeLookupByCheckTool,
|
|
} from '../src/tools.js';
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Shared test fixtures
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
/** A fully-scoped finance context — happy-path default. */
|
|
const financeCtx: AuthContext = {
|
|
sub: 'adam@seahavenind.com',
|
|
scopes: ['finance:read'],
|
|
aud: 'sh-mcp-finance',
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/** A context that lacks finance:read — for scope-rejection tests. */
|
|
const opsOnlyCtx: AuthContext = {
|
|
sub: 'staff@seahavenind.com',
|
|
scopes: ['ops:read'],
|
|
aud: 'sh-mcp-ops',
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const samplePayment: Payment = {
|
|
paymentId: 'pmt-001',
|
|
vendor: 'Acme Electrical Supply',
|
|
vendorContact: 'billing@acme.example.com',
|
|
amount: 4250.0,
|
|
currency: 'USD',
|
|
invoiceNumber: 'INV-2026-0042',
|
|
checkNumber: '10412',
|
|
paymentDate: '2026-05-15',
|
|
status: 'cleared',
|
|
bankAccountNumber: '123456789',
|
|
bankRoutingNumber: '021000021',
|
|
cardNumber: '4111111111111111',
|
|
memo: 'Electrical supplies for Ronkonkoma site',
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Mock client builder
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function makeMockClient(overrides?: Partial<PaymentsClient>): PaymentsClient {
|
|
return {
|
|
getByVendor: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([samplePayment]),
|
|
getByInvoice: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([samplePayment]),
|
|
getByCheck: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([samplePayment]),
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// lookup_payment_by_vendor
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('lookup_payment_by_vendor', () => {
|
|
let client: PaymentsClient;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns payments and redacts sensitive fields on the happy path', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ vendor: 'Acme' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.count).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(result.payments).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
|
|
const p = result.payments[0]!;
|
|
// Vendor name and contact must be intact.
|
|
expect(p.vendor).toBe('Acme Electrical Supply');
|
|
expect(p.vendorContact).toBe('billing@acme.example.com');
|
|
|
|
// Sensitive fields must be redacted (not equal to the originals).
|
|
expect(p.bankAccountNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.bankAccountNumber);
|
|
expect(p.bankRoutingNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.bankRoutingNumber);
|
|
expect(p.cardNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.cardNumber);
|
|
|
|
// Non-sensitive fields must be preserved.
|
|
expect(p.amount).toBe(4250.0);
|
|
expect(p.status).toBe('cleared');
|
|
expect(p.paymentDate).toBe('2026-05-15');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('forwards the vendor string and limit to the client', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
await tool.handler({ vendor: 'Acme', limit: 5 }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(client.getByVendor).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Acme', { limit: 5 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps limit at 100', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
await tool.handler({ vendor: 'Acme', limit: 9999 }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(client.getByVendor).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Acme', { limit: 100 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns empty result when the client returns no payments', async () => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient({
|
|
getByVendor: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
|
|
});
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ vendor: 'Unknown Vendor' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.count).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.payments).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('propagates a client error', async () => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient({
|
|
getByVendor: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('DynamoDB unavailable')),
|
|
});
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
|
|
await expect(tool.handler({ vendor: 'Acme' }, financeCtx)).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
'DynamoDB unavailable',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('retries and succeeds after a transient throttle error', async () => {
|
|
// Simulate a throttle on the first call, success on the second.
|
|
const throttleError = Object.assign(new Error('ProvisionedThroughputExceededException'), {
|
|
name: 'ProvisionedThroughputExceededException',
|
|
});
|
|
const getByVendor = vi
|
|
.fn()
|
|
.mockRejectedValueOnce(throttleError)
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce([samplePayment]);
|
|
|
|
client = makeMockClient({ getByVendor });
|
|
|
|
// The tool itself does not implement retry logic — that is the
|
|
// responsibility of the client implementation. We verify here that
|
|
// when the client internally retries and succeeds, the tool returns
|
|
// the correct result. We simulate this by wrapping the tool call
|
|
// in a simple retry loop (as a client-layer retry would do).
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
let result;
|
|
for (let attempt = 0; attempt < 2; attempt++) {
|
|
try {
|
|
result = await tool.handler({ vendor: 'Acme' }, financeCtx);
|
|
break;
|
|
} catch {
|
|
if (attempt === 1) throw new Error('Max retries exceeded');
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(result?.count).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(getByVendor).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('throws ScopeError when the caller lacks finance:read', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
|
|
await expect(tool.handler({ vendor: 'Acme' }, opsOnlyCtx)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the error comes from requireScope, not from the client.
|
|
expect(client.getByVendor).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('has the correct tool metadata', () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
|
|
expect(tool.name).toBe('lookup_payment_by_vendor');
|
|
expect(tool.tier).toBe('finance');
|
|
expect(tool.requiredScope).toBe('finance:read');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// lookup_payment_by_invoice
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('lookup_payment_by_invoice', () => {
|
|
let client: PaymentsClient;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns the matching payment with sensitive fields redacted', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByInvoiceTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ invoiceNumber: 'INV-2026-0042' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.count).toBe(1);
|
|
const p = result.payments[0]!;
|
|
expect(p.vendor).toBe('Acme Electrical Supply');
|
|
expect(p.bankAccountNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.bankAccountNumber);
|
|
expect(p.bankRoutingNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.bankRoutingNumber);
|
|
expect(p.cardNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.cardNumber);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('forwards the invoice number to the client', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByInvoiceTool(client);
|
|
await tool.handler({ invoiceNumber: 'INV-2026-0042' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(client.getByInvoice).toHaveBeenCalledWith('INV-2026-0042');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns empty result when invoice is not found', async () => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient({
|
|
getByInvoice: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
|
|
});
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByInvoiceTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ invoiceNumber: 'INV-NOTFOUND' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.count).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.payments).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('propagates a client error', async () => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient({
|
|
getByInvoice: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('Internal service error')),
|
|
});
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByInvoiceTool(client);
|
|
|
|
await expect(tool.handler({ invoiceNumber: 'INV-2026-0042' }, financeCtx)).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
'Internal service error',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('retries and succeeds after a transient throttle error', async () => {
|
|
const throttleError = Object.assign(new Error('ProvisionedThroughputExceededException'), {
|
|
name: 'ProvisionedThroughputExceededException',
|
|
});
|
|
const getByInvoice = vi
|
|
.fn()
|
|
.mockRejectedValueOnce(throttleError)
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce([samplePayment]);
|
|
|
|
client = makeMockClient({ getByInvoice });
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByInvoiceTool(client);
|
|
|
|
let result;
|
|
for (let attempt = 0; attempt < 2; attempt++) {
|
|
try {
|
|
result = await tool.handler({ invoiceNumber: 'INV-2026-0042' }, financeCtx);
|
|
break;
|
|
} catch {
|
|
if (attempt === 1) throw new Error('Max retries exceeded');
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(result?.count).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(getByInvoice).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('throws ScopeError when the caller lacks finance:read', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByInvoiceTool(client);
|
|
|
|
await expect(tool.handler({ invoiceNumber: 'INV-2026-0042' }, opsOnlyCtx)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(client.getByInvoice).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('has the correct tool metadata', () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByInvoiceTool(client);
|
|
|
|
expect(tool.name).toBe('lookup_payment_by_invoice');
|
|
expect(tool.tier).toBe('finance');
|
|
expect(tool.requiredScope).toBe('finance:read');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// lookup_payment_by_check
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('lookup_payment_by_check', () => {
|
|
let client: PaymentsClient;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns the matching payment with sensitive fields redacted', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByCheckTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ checkNumber: '10412' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.count).toBe(1);
|
|
const p = result.payments[0]!;
|
|
expect(p.vendor).toBe('Acme Electrical Supply');
|
|
expect(p.bankAccountNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.bankAccountNumber);
|
|
expect(p.bankRoutingNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.bankRoutingNumber);
|
|
expect(p.cardNumber).not.toBe(samplePayment.cardNumber);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('forwards the check number to the client', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByCheckTool(client);
|
|
await tool.handler({ checkNumber: '10412' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(client.getByCheck).toHaveBeenCalledWith('10412');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns empty result when check number is not found', async () => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient({
|
|
getByCheck: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
|
|
});
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByCheckTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ checkNumber: '99999' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.count).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.payments).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('propagates a client error', async () => {
|
|
client = makeMockClient({
|
|
getByCheck: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('Connection timeout')),
|
|
});
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByCheckTool(client);
|
|
|
|
await expect(tool.handler({ checkNumber: '10412' }, financeCtx)).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
'Connection timeout',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('retries and succeeds after a transient throttle error', async () => {
|
|
const throttleError = Object.assign(new Error('ProvisionedThroughputExceededException'), {
|
|
name: 'ProvisionedThroughputExceededException',
|
|
});
|
|
const getByCheck = vi
|
|
.fn()
|
|
.mockRejectedValueOnce(throttleError)
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce([samplePayment]);
|
|
|
|
client = makeMockClient({ getByCheck });
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByCheckTool(client);
|
|
|
|
let result;
|
|
for (let attempt = 0; attempt < 2; attempt++) {
|
|
try {
|
|
result = await tool.handler({ checkNumber: '10412' }, financeCtx);
|
|
break;
|
|
} catch {
|
|
if (attempt === 1) throw new Error('Max retries exceeded');
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(result?.count).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(getByCheck).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('throws ScopeError when the caller lacks finance:read', async () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByCheckTool(client);
|
|
|
|
await expect(tool.handler({ checkNumber: '10412' }, opsOnlyCtx)).rejects.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(client.getByCheck).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('has the correct tool metadata', () => {
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByCheckTool(client);
|
|
|
|
expect(tool.name).toBe('lookup_payment_by_check');
|
|
expect(tool.tier).toBe('finance');
|
|
expect(tool.requiredScope).toBe('finance:read');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Redaction contract — cross-cutting
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('redaction contract', () => {
|
|
it('does not redact vendor name or vendor contact', async () => {
|
|
const client = makeMockClient();
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ vendor: 'Acme' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
const p = result.payments[0]!;
|
|
expect(p.vendor).toBe('Acme Electrical Supply');
|
|
expect(p.vendorContact).toBe('billing@acme.example.com');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('redacts all three sensitive fields when present', async () => {
|
|
const client = makeMockClient();
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ vendor: 'Acme' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
const p = result.payments[0]!;
|
|
// None of the redacted values should equal the originals.
|
|
expect(p.bankAccountNumber).not.toBe('123456789');
|
|
expect(p.bankRoutingNumber).not.toBe('021000021');
|
|
expect(p.cardNumber).not.toBe('4111111111111111');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('omits redacted fields when they were undefined in the source', async () => {
|
|
const minimalPayment: Payment = {
|
|
paymentId: 'pmt-002',
|
|
vendor: 'Generic Vendor',
|
|
amount: 100,
|
|
currency: 'USD',
|
|
paymentDate: '2026-06-01',
|
|
status: 'cleared',
|
|
// No bankAccountNumber, bankRoutingNumber, or cardNumber
|
|
};
|
|
const client = makeMockClient({
|
|
getByVendor: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([minimalPayment]),
|
|
});
|
|
const tool = makeLookupByVendorTool(client);
|
|
const result = await tool.handler({ vendor: 'Generic' }, financeCtx);
|
|
|
|
const p = result.payments[0]!;
|
|
expect(p.bankAccountNumber).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(p.bankRoutingNumber).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(p.cardNumber).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// requireScope integration check
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('requireScope integration', () => {
|
|
it('requireScope does not throw when finance:read is present', () => {
|
|
// Smoke-test the shared helper directly to confirm it accepts our fixture.
|
|
expect(() => requireScope(financeCtx, 'finance:read')).not.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('requireScope throws when finance:read is absent', () => {
|
|
expect(() => requireScope(opsOnlyCtx, 'finance:read')).toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|