Merge pull request #104 from Sea-Haven-Industries/feature/per-workload-lambda-boundaries
Some checks are pending
Deploy / deploy-management (push) Waiting to run
Deploy / deploy-external-dev (push) Waiting to run
Deploy / deploy-security (push) Waiting to run
Deploy / deploy-dev (push) Waiting to run
Deploy / deploy-prod (push) Waiting to run

feat(iam): add per-workload lambda execution boundaries (PLAT-52)
This commit is contained in:
Adam Moussa 2026-08-13 17:51:53 -04:00 • committed by GitHub
commit a2e9449ef1
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
3 changed files with 593 additions and 177 deletions

View file

@ -126,8 +126,9 @@ deploy `seahaven-deploy-substrate` into each member account that hosts SAM
workloads (currently seahaven-prod and seahaven-dev). It contains the shared
account-level deploy plumbing:
- the `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary` permissions boundary (ceiling for
every SAM-generated Lambda execution role),
- the `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary` permissions boundary (legacy
shared ceiling for roles not yet retargeted) plus per-workload policies
`seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload>` (PLAT-52),
- the `github-cfn-execution-role` CloudFormation execution role that `cd-sam`
callers pass as `cfn-role-arn`,
- optionally the GitHub OIDC identity provider (`createOidcProvider: true`,
@ -140,17 +141,22 @@ of truth for mgmt (328440206208) until its stacks migrate out.
**The two copies are no longer at parity, and the old "edit both files" rule no
longer applies uniformly.** Under INFRA-186, `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary`
in *this* copy was reduced to a fleet-wide floor for prod and dev (where
boundary usage was 0, so no live Lambda could break): CloudWatch Logs write on
`/aws/lambda*`, log-group describe, X-Ray, and ENI lifecycle — nothing else.
Each migrating stack adds its own data-plane statements, derived from its own
template, in its own PR (per-workload boundaries are the INFRA-187 end state).
mgmt's copy keeps the account-wide wildcards pending its own separately
validated rollout across 26 live boundary-carrying roles. So: **the boundary
resource is deliberately divergent**; every *other* substrate resource
(`github-cfn-execution-role`, `seahaven-cfn-exec-iam-management`) is still
expected to change in both files together. The template's provenance header
records which is which — read it before assuming either parity or divergence.
in *this* copy was reduced to a fleet-wide floor for prod and dev; later
migrations packed per-workload data plane back into that shared document until
it hit the 6,144-character cap (PLAT-93 / PLAT-100). PLAT-52 adds per-workload
policies `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload>` (floor plus that
stack's data plane) and switches both prod/dev guardrails to a StringEquals
allow-list of the shared ARN plus each per-workload ARN. The shared document
is left unchanged until live roles retarget. Mgmt's copy keeps the
account-wide wildcards and a **single-ARN** pin pending its own separately
validated rollout across 26 live boundary-carrying roles (PLAT-51). So: **the
boundary resource is deliberately divergent**, and the guardrail
`iam:PermissionsBoundary` condition **cardinality** is also divergent
(enumerated list here, scalar on mgmt). Do not weaken mgmt to ArnLike. Every
*other* substrate resource (`github-cfn-execution-role`,
`seahaven-cfn-exec-iam-management` Sid/Action/Resource sets) is still expected
to change in both files together. The template's provenance header records
which is which — read it before assuming either parity or divergence.
Per-repo `githubdeploy-*` deploy roles are deliberately NOT part
of the substrate — they are provisioned per repo at migration/onboarding time
@ -159,7 +165,9 @@ to it.
**Escalation controls on `github-cfn-execution-role`.** Every `iam:CreateRole`,
`AttachRolePolicy` and `PutRolePolicy` is conditioned on the target carrying
`seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary`. That condition alone is not sufficient,
one of the enumerated `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary` ARNs (the shared
policy plus each `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload>`). That
condition alone is not sufficient,
so the attached `seahaven-cfn-exec-iam-management` managed policy also carries
three explicit Deny statements:
@ -214,9 +222,10 @@ shared account-level plumbing:
`aws.workload.identity`; Retain — it is the federation anchor for every
future `hcptf-*` role),
- the `seahaven-hcptf-iam-management` guardrail policy: the boundary-gated
IAM role lifecycle (conditioned on `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary`,
owned by the deploy-substrate stack — hence the explicit stack dependency
in `bin/app.ts`) plus the `DenyBoundaryTampering` / `DenyBoundaryPolicyEdit`
IAM role lifecycle (conditioned on the enumerated
`seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary` allow-list owned by the
deploy-substrate stack — hence the explicit stack dependency in
`bin/app.ts`) plus the `DenyBoundaryTampering` / `DenyBoundaryPolicyEdit`
/ `DenySelfMutation` backstops.
**This policy derives from `seahaven-cfn-exec-iam-management` but is
@ -281,14 +290,16 @@ this template rather than inventing new IAM shapes.
(or `:apply`). Exact `StringEquals` only — never `StringLike`, never a
wildcarded `run_phase` (a speculative PR plan must never hold write
credentials). **If the stack creates Lambda execution roles, this same PR
must also widen `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary`** per the WIDENING
PATH in `lib/deploy-substrate/deploy-substrate.template.yaml` with the
**exact** secret ARNs from step 1 (no `secret:afi-*` patterns): the
guardrail forces every Terraform-created role to carry that boundary, and
it is a fleet-wide floor with zero data-plane permissions until widened —
an unwidened migration deploys green, then every data-plane call is denied
must also add `seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<stack>`** per the
WIDENING PATH in `lib/deploy-substrate/deploy-substrate.template.yaml`
(floor plus that stack's data plane, **exact** secret ARNs from step 1,
no `secret:afi-*` patterns) **and** append that policy's ARN to both
guardrail StringEquals allow-lists. Do not add data-plane to the shared
`seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary` document. The guardrail forces every
Terraform-created role to carry a listed boundary; an unlisted or
floor-only boundary deploys green, then every data-plane call is denied
at first invoke and async/DLQ writes are discarded silently. IAM roles and
boundary widenings = mandatory cross-family review +
boundary policies = mandatory cross-family review +
`/sh-security-review` on the diff.
3a. **Plan role (required for every stack):** attach
@ -321,8 +332,9 @@ this template rather than inventing new IAM shapes.
`list-attached-role-policies`; trust subs match the live
org/project/workspace names byte-for-byte; simulate the apply role against
a `hcptf-*` ARN (expect `explicitDeny` from `DenySelfMutation`) and against
a normal stack role name (expect `allowed`); and if step 3 widened the
boundary, confirm the deployed default version carries the stack's
a normal stack role name (expect `allowed`); and if step 3 added a
per-workload boundary, confirm the deployed default version of
`seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<stack>` carries the stack's
data-plane statements (`aws iam get-policy-version`) — role verification
alone never checks boundary content. Mechanical template↔deployed policy
reconcile as for other substrate policies.
@ -332,7 +344,9 @@ this template rather than inventing new IAM shapes.
trust is pinned per workspace, so a shared set breaks every other
workspace. Auto-apply stays OFF until the stack is sealed.
6. **App Terraform PR:** every `aws_iam_role` sets `path = "/tf-managed/"` and
the boundary; package Lambda/layer zips via an account artifact S3 bucket
`permissions_boundary` to that stack's
`seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<stack>` ARN (not the shared name,
once the per-workload policy exists); package Lambda/layer zips via an account artifact S3 bucket
and `aws_s3_object` `content_base64` (HCP plan and apply run on separate
workers and do not share local `archive_file` paths — see
`afi-backup-monitor/terraform/artifacts.tf`); functions `depends_on` their

View file

@ -41,13 +41,19 @@ Description: >-
# DenyBoundaryPolicyEdit scope were then ported back here, so the two
# copies' GUARDRAIL statement sets were reconciled as of that date.
# SamCfnIamManagementPolicy and SamCfnExecutionRole remain at parity on
# their IAM STATEMENT SETS across the two files and MUST still be changed
# together. Parity covers statements, not surrounding comments — a comment
# may diverge where it describes boundary content, which now differs
# between the files. The only functional delta
# between them is the DependsOn line above, which is ordering, not
# permission. LambdaExecutionBoundary is NO LONGER byte-identical — see
# DELIBERATE DIVERGENCE below.
# their IAM STATEMENT SETS across the two files EXCEPT the
# iam:PermissionsBoundary StringEquals VALUE. Prod/dev (this file) now
# enumerates the shared ARN plus each seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload>
# ARN (PLAT-52). Mgmt's .github copy keeps the unsuffixed single ARN —
# those per-workload policies do not exist in mgmt, and adding them to
# mgmt's allow-list would be a no-op that reads as false parity. Do not
# weaken mgmt to ArnLike. Sid names, Deny statements, and every other
# Action/Resource still change in both files together. Parity covers
# statements, not surrounding comments — a comment may diverge where it
# describes boundary content, which now differs between the files. The
# only other functional delta is the DependsOn line above, which is
# ordering, not permission. LambdaExecutionBoundary is NO LONGER
# byte-identical — see DELIBERATE DIVERGENCE below.
#
# DELIBERATE DIVERGENCE — LambdaExecutionBoundary (INFRA-186, 2026-07-30)
# The parity rule above is SCOPED, not global. LambdaExecutionBoundary in THIS
@ -108,38 +114,51 @@ Description: >-
# ready to roll back — and is explicitly OUT OF SCOPE of INFRA-186. Until that
# lands, the two copies stay divergent and that is the intended state.
#
# COUPLING: the boundary's ManagedPolicyName and ARN are UNCHANGED and must stay
# unchanged. Four Conditions in SamCfnIamManagementPolicy below, and four more in
# HcptfIamManagementPolicy in lib/terraform-substrate/terraform-substrate.template.yaml,
# pin arn:aws:iam::<account>:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary by literal
# string inside StringEquals iam:PermissionsBoundary. A rename fails SILENTLY — an
# IAM condition naming a non-existent policy simply never matches, so the
# escalation control would evaporate rather than error — and would additionally
# force a CloudFormation REPLACEMENT that any role carrying the boundary would
# block. INFRA-186 is a CONTENT-ONLY change for exactly this reason;
# terraform-substrate.template.yaml already records that expectation and is
# correctly left untouched.
# COUPLING (PLAT-52): the SHARED policy's ManagedPolicyName and ARN
# (seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary) stay unchanged until
# PermissionsBoundaryUsageCount is 0 in the account. Four Conditions in
# SamCfnIamManagementPolicy below, and four more in HcptfIamManagementPolicy
# in lib/terraform-substrate/terraform-substrate.template.yaml, pin an
# enumerated StringEquals list of acceptable boundary ARNs: the shared ARN
# plus each seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload> ARN. The two files'
# lists MUST match (mechanical sorted-JSON compare). A rename of the SHARED
# policy still fails SILENTLY — an IAM condition naming a non-existent policy
# simply never matches, so the escalation control evaporates rather than
# error — and would additionally force a CloudFormation REPLACEMENT that any
# role carrying the boundary would block. Adding a workload is a NEW named
# ManagedPolicy in this file AND one ARN appended to both allow-lists. Do
# not use ArnLike on seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-*: githubdeploy-seahaven-org-baseline
# can CreatePolicy via CFN, so a conforming-name policy would become an
# acceptable ceiling without touching the eight pin sites.
#
# SIZE BUDGET: an attached managed policy document is capped at 6,144 characters
# (whitespace excluded). LambdaExecutionBoundary measures 5986 characters across
# 15 statements as of 2026-08-10 (PLAT-100: MealOrderManagerSsm+LambdaInvoke
# consolidated with execute-api:Invoke; SES kept separate because Resource:"*"
# must not share a statement with execute-api:Invoke. Was 5903/16 after PLAT-93).
# Measure before widening — len(json.dumps(doc, separators=(',',':'))) on the
# synthesized PolicyDocument with ${AWS::AccountId} resolved, and UPDATE THESE
# TWO NUMBERS in the same edit.
# (whitespace excluded). Measure with len(json.dumps(doc, separators=(',',':')))
# on the synthesized PolicyDocument with ${AWS::AccountId} resolved, and UPDATE
# THE NUMBERS in the same edit.
#
# Headroom is 158 characters. Statement consolidation (shared WorkloadSecrets /
# WorkloadDynamoDB / extended WorkloadS3 Resource lists; no new action wildcards)
# is the only remaining lever short of per-workload boundaries. If the budget
# tightens again, the end-state fix is per-workload boundaries
# (seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload>), which also resolves the
# shared-ceiling residual — tracked as PLAT-52 / INFRA-187, do not improvise it.
# CRITICAL: unlike the 2026-07-27 inline-limit incident,
# there is NO restructure available when this cap is reached — a role has exactly
# ONE permissions boundary, so statements cannot be spilled into a second attached
# managed policy. At the cap the only levers are prefix consolidation and dropping
# unused actions. Do not introduce dynamodb:* / s3:* / ses:Send* to reclaim space.
# Shared LambdaExecutionBoundary (legacy ceiling; do not widen): 5986
# characters / 15 statements as of 2026-08-10 (PLAT-100). Headroom 158.
# Leave it unchanged until live roles retarget (PLAT-52 phase 2).
#
# Per-workload policies (floor + own data plane). Compact sizes recorded
# after synth (prod, ${AWS::AccountId}=011934824531):
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-afi-backup-monitor: 952 / 5 statements
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-front-integrations: 1532 / 6 statements
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-procurement-ingest: 3977 / 11 statements
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-meal-order-manager: 2380 / 10 statements
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-seahaven-site: 1159 / 6 statements
# Dev copies are floor-only (691 / 4) via IsProdAccount.
#
# Guardrail PolicyDocuments also cap at 6,144. Each extra allow-list ARN
# is copied into four Sids in EACH of SamCfnIamManagementPolicy and
# HcptfIamManagementPolicy. Measured after this list (6 ARNs):
# seahaven-cfn-exec-iam-management: 4571 / 10 statements (1573 headroom)
# seahaven-hcptf-iam-management: 4693 / 10 statements (1451 headroom)
#
# CRITICAL: a role has exactly ONE permissions boundary, so statements cannot
# be spilled into a second attached managed policy. Do not introduce
# dynamodb:* / s3:* / ses:Send* to reclaim space. Do not add new data-plane
# to the shared document; create seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<stack>.
#
# This template is deployed via lib/deploy-substrate-stack.ts
# (cloudformation-include) as stack seahaven-deploy-substrate, once per member
@ -192,32 +211,22 @@ Resources:
# intersection of the role's own policies and this boundary, so a misconfigured
# SAM role can never exceed what is listed here.
#
# SCOPING RULE (INFRA-186, 2026-07-30). This boundary is the FLEET-WIDE FLOOR
# ONLY: what every Lambda execution role needs regardless of workload. It
# carries NO per-workload data-plane statements — each migrating stack adds its
# own, from its own template, in its own PR (see the note on the boundary
# resource and the WIDENING PATH below). It was previously a deliberate SUPERSET
# with account-wide wildcards (table/*, secret:*, sqs :*, function:*,
# parameter/*, and an s3:::*-<accountid> pattern that was a name-suffix filter,
# not an ownership check). That trade-off was made when the only account
# carrying this policy hosted nothing but the five SAM stacks. It does not
# survive multi-tenancy: seahaven-prod now hosts CDK-owned tenants
# (proposal-system, procurement-ingest, workorder-ingest) whose tables, buckets,
# secrets and queues those wildcards reached, and whose Lambdas carry NO
# permissions boundary at all — making function:* a boundary-escape primitive.
#
# Tightening here carries ZERO runtime risk and was sequenced deliberately:
# PermissionsBoundaryUsageCount is 0 in BOTH accounts this template deploys to
# (seahaven-prod 011934824531 and seahaven-dev 710827005802, verified
# 2026-07-30), so no live Lambda can break. A boundary that is slightly TOO
# TIGHT is recoverable here — the migrating stack widens it in its own PR before
# its first deploy — whereas leaving it loose perpetuates the exposure. Prefer
# tighter; the widening path is below.
# SCOPING RULE (PLAT-52 phase 1, 2026-08-13). New workloads get their own
# ManagedPolicy seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload>: the fleet-wide
# floor (CloudWatchLogsWrite / CloudWatchLogsDescribe / XRay / Ec2Eni) plus
# that workload's data plane, derived from ITS OWN template. Do not add new
# data-plane statements to the shared seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary
# document — it is the legacy ceiling for roles not yet retargeted and stays
# unchanged until PermissionsBoundaryUsageCount is 0. INFRA-186 reduced this
# copy to a floor and later migrations packed data plane back into it under
# the 6,144-character cap (PLAT-93 / PLAT-100). Per-workload policies are
# the escape hatch from that cap and from the shared-ceiling residual.
#
# A resource pattern that genuinely CANNOT be scoped keeps its wildcard WITH a
# written justification on the statement: CloudWatchLogsDescribe, XRay and
# Ec2Eni name runtime-created resources or use actions AWS authorises against
# "*" regardless of the ARN supplied. Do not "tighten" those.
# "*" regardless of the ARN supplied. Do not "tighten" those. Copy them into
# every per-workload policy (a role takes exactly one boundary).
#
# Every "verified <date>" annotation in this file is a POINT-IN-TIME
# observation, not live state. Re-validate (usage counts, log-group CMK state,
@ -225,20 +234,22 @@ Resources:
# future change.
#
# WIDENING PATH — read this before migrating a stack into prod or dev.
# The boundary is never widened by the person who hits the AccessDenied. It is
# widened by the migrating stack's owner, in THIS repo, BEFORE the workload's
# The ceiling is never widened by the person who hits the AccessDenied. It is
# created by the migrating stack's owner, in THIS repo, BEFORE the workload's
# first deploy into the target account:
# 0. PRECONDITION — check the managed-policy VERSION budget BEFORE merging:
# max 5 versions, both
# accounts are on v1 today. Every widening (PolicyDocument edit) burns
# one. Description, ManagedPolicyName and Path are REPLACEMENT
# properties per the CFN resource reference — CloudFormation cannot
# replace a custom-named policy, so a Description-only edit FAILS the
# stack update, and the error's suggested remedy (rename) is exactly
# the forbidden rename in the COUPLING note above. Never edit those
# three properties. Delete the oldest non-default version if at 5:
# 0. Create AWS::IAM::ManagedPolicy seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<stack>
# in this file (floor via the YAML anchors on AfiBackupMonitorBoundary,
# plus that stack's data plane). Do NOT edit the shared
# LambdaExecutionBoundary PolicyDocument. Description, ManagedPolicyName
# and Path on an existing named policy are REPLACEMENT properties —
# CloudFormation cannot replace a custom-named policy, so a
# Description-only edit FAILS the stack update, and the error's suggested
# remedy (rename) is the forbidden rename in the COUPLING note. Never
# edit those three properties on a policy that already exists. New
# policies start at v1. Per-policy version budget (max 5) applies when
# later editing that workload's document:
# aws iam list-policy-versions --policy-arn \
# arn:aws:iam::<acct>:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary
# arn:aws:iam::<acct>:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<stack>
# aws iam delete-policy-version --version-id v<oldest-non-default> ...
# 1. Derive the workload's needs from ITS OWN TEMPLATE — open the stack's
# template.yaml and read the actual IAM policy statements. The
@ -246,29 +257,34 @@ Resources:
# the /sh-security-review pass on 2026-07-30 found SIX places where it was
# incomplete or simply invented a resource name, three of which would have
# failed silently. Update that block in the same edit with what you find.
# 2. Add the workload's statements. Group by service so a second workload can
# extend a Resource list rather than duplicate an action list (~250
# characters for zero new actions; an extra ARN costs ~60). Check for the
# SILENT classes specifically: a denied SQS destination/DLQ write discards
# the async event with no error and no alarm; a denied scheduler call may
# sit behind a bare except; a denied KMS decrypt for env-var encryption
# fails at cold-start INIT; any CMK-encrypted resource needs the
# matching kms:ViaService principal, not just the kms action; and a
# function using LoggingConfig with a custom log-group name outside
# /aws/lambda* silently loses ALL logs — add a scoped logs statement
# for the custom group or keep the default group name.
# 3. Measure. See SIZE BUDGET in the header. There is NO escape hatch.
# 4. Both review gates run and neither discharges the other: the GPT-4.1
# cross-family review against the real diff, and /sh-security-review
# 2. Add the workload's statements to ITS policy. Do not pack them into
# another workload's Resource lists. Check for the SILENT classes:
# a denied SQS destination/DLQ write discards the async event with no
# error and no alarm; a denied scheduler call may sit behind a bare
# except; a denied KMS decrypt for env-var encryption fails at cold-start
# INIT; any CMK-encrypted resource needs the matching kms:ViaService
# principal, not just the kms action; and a function using LoggingConfig
# with a custom log-group name outside /aws/lambda* silently loses ALL
# logs — add a scoped logs statement for the custom group or keep the
# default group name.
# 3. Measure THAT policy against 6144 (SIZE BUDGET). Also measure both
# guardrail PolicyDocuments after step 4 — each new ARN is copied into
# four Sids in each guardrail.
# 4. Append the new ARN to BOTH allow-lists (SamCfnIamManagementPolicy in
# this file AND HcptfIamManagementPolicy in
# terraform-substrate.template.yaml). The lists must match. Do not use
# ArnLike. Both review gates run and neither discharges the other: the
# GPT-4.1 cross-family review against the real diff, and /sh-security-review
# (IaC/IAM is on the mandatory surface). CLI down = review outstanding.
# 5. Merge and let CI deploy deploy-substrate-prod / deploy-substrate-dev to
# UPDATE_COMPLETE, THEN deploy the workload stack.
# 5. Merge and let CI deploy deploy-substrate-prod / deploy-substrate-dev
# (and terraform-substrate) to UPDATE_COMPLETE, THEN deploy the workload
# with PermissionsBoundary set to THIS stack's ARN (not the shared name).
# ORDERING IS NOT ENFORCED BY CLOUDFORMATION AND THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT
# SENTENCE HERE: the workload's deploy SUCCEEDS even against a stale boundary,
# because seahaven-cfn-exec-iam-management's gate checks that the boundary ARN
# is attached, never its contents. The failure surfaces later, at first invoke,
# as AccessDenied. A stale boundary is a silent deploy-time pass and a loud
# production failure.
# SENTENCE HERE: the workload's deploy SUCCEEDS even against a stale or
# missing-content boundary, because the guardrail gates check that a listed
# boundary ARN is attached, never its contents. The failure surfaces later,
# at first invoke, as AccessDenied. A stale boundary is a silent deploy-time
# pass and a loud production failure.
#
# CONSIDERED AND REJECTED: a Deny statement reserving the seahaven-* namespace.
# With the Allow set reduced to the fleet-wide floor it is fully redundant (verified
@ -705,28 +721,397 @@ Resources:
Resource: "*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
# ── FURTHER PER-WORKLOAD DATA-PLANE STATEMENTS ──────────────────────
# Floor above + consolidated WorkloadSecrets/DynamoDB/S3 (PLAT-93) +
# procurement remainder + seahaven-site (PLAT-91) + meal-order extras
# (PLAT-70). Prefer extending existing Resource lists over new SIDs.
# Additional stacks add statements here, derived from THEIR OWN
# template, in their own PR, deployed to UPDATE_COMPLETE before first
# workload deploy. Measure SIZE BUDGET before merging. WIDENING PATH
# in the header still governs.
#
# WHY the floor stayed empty of data-plane (decided 2026-07-30, Adam):
# The security win of INFRA-186 comes from DELETION, not enumeration.
# Removing the account-wide secret:*, table/*, function:* and sqs:*
# wildcards is what closes the amplifier. Per-workload prefixes add no
# security; they exist only to keep a workload FUNCTIONAL once it
# arrives. WIDENING IS THE SAFE DIRECTION.
#
# The end-state fix for the shared-ceiling residual (one boundary =
# every SAM/Terraform workload reaches every other's data plane once
# they land) is per-workload boundaries — tracked as PLAT-52 /
# INFRA-187. Do not improvise it: both guardrail policies pin ONE
# literal boundary ARN inside StringEquals conditions, and loosening
# that to a wildcard weakens the gate.
# ── FURTHER PER-WORKLOAD DATA-PLANE ────────────────────────────────
# Do not add statements here. Create seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<stack>
# below and append its ARN to both guardrail allow-lists (WIDENING PATH).
# This shared document stays unchanged until live roles retarget
# (PLAT-52 phase 2) and PermissionsBoundaryUsageCount reaches 0.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Per-workload Lambda execution boundaries (PLAT-52 phase 1)
#
# Each policy is the fleet floor plus that workload's data plane, split from
# the shared document above without editing it. Live roles keep the shared
# ARN until app-repo retargets. Guardrail StringEquals lists include both.
# Floor statements are YAML-anchored on AfiBackupMonitorBoundary; later
# policies alias them. Floor rationale lives on LambdaExecutionBoundary.
# Prod-only data plane stays behind IsProdAccount (same as the shared copy).
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AfiBackupMonitorBoundary:
Type: AWS::IAM::ManagedPolicy
Properties:
ManagedPolicyName: seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-afi-backup-monitor
Description: >-
Per-workload permissions boundary for afi-backup-monitor (PLAT-52).
Floor plus exact prod secret ARNs. Shared seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary
remains the live-role ceiling until app retarget.
PolicyDocument:
Version: "2012-10-17"
Statement:
- &lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsWrite
Sid: CloudWatchLogsWrite
Effect: Allow
Action:
- logs:CreateLogGroup
- logs:CreateLogStream
- logs:PutLogEvents
- logs:DescribeLogStreams
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:logs:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:log-group:/aws/lambda*"
- &lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsDescribe
Sid: CloudWatchLogsDescribe
Effect: Allow
Action:
- logs:DescribeLogGroups
Resource: "*"
- &lambdaBoundaryFloorXRay
Sid: XRay
Effect: Allow
Action:
- xray:PutTraceSegments
- xray:PutTelemetryRecords
Resource: "*"
- &lambdaBoundaryFloorEc2Eni
Sid: Ec2Eni
Effect: Allow
Action:
- ec2:CreateNetworkInterface
- ec2:DescribeNetworkInterfaces
- ec2:DeleteNetworkInterface
- ec2:DescribeSubnets
- ec2:DescribeSecurityGroups
- ec2:DescribeVpcs
Resource: "*"
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: AfiBackupMonitorSecrets
Effect: Allow
Action:
- secretsmanager:GetSecretValue
Resource:
- arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:011934824531:secret:afi-api-key-w0E02a
- arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:011934824531:secret:afi-slack-webhook-T4oR3G
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
FrontIntegrationsBoundary:
Type: AWS::IAM::ManagedPolicy
Properties:
ManagedPolicyName: seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-front-integrations
Description: >-
Per-workload permissions boundary for front-integrations (PLAT-52).
Floor plus exact prod secrets and front-sla-alerts. Shared policy
remains the live-role ceiling until app retarget.
PolicyDocument:
Version: "2012-10-17"
Statement:
# Floor aliases — edit the &lambdaBoundaryFloor* anchors on
# AfiBackupMonitorBoundary only; do not inline a divergent copy.
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsWrite
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsDescribe
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorXRay
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorEc2Eni
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: FrontIntegrationsSecrets
Effect: Allow
Action:
- secretsmanager:GetSecretValue
Resource:
- arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:011934824531:secret:front-integrations/front-api-token-UXKv0U
- arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:011934824531:secret:front-integrations/slack-bot-token-giGfA7
- arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:011934824531:secret:front-integrations/google-service-account-dqv3Bo
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: FrontIntegrationsDynamoDB
Effect: Allow
Action:
- dynamodb:GetItem
- dynamodb:PutItem
- dynamodb:UpdateItem
- dynamodb:DeleteItem
- dynamodb:Query
- dynamodb:Scan
- dynamodb:BatchGetItem
- dynamodb:BatchWriteItem
- dynamodb:DescribeTable
- dynamodb:ConditionCheckItem
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/front-sla-alerts"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/front-sla-alerts/index/*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
ProcurementIngestBoundary:
Type: AWS::IAM::ManagedPolicy
Properties:
ManagedPolicyName: seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-procurement-ingest
Description: >-
Per-workload permissions boundary for procurement-ingest including
bundled workorder-ingest data plane (PLAT-86 grouping, PLAT-52 split).
Shared policy remains the live-role ceiling until app retarget.
PolicyDocument:
Version: "2012-10-17"
Statement:
# Floor aliases — edit the &lambdaBoundaryFloor* anchors on
# AfiBackupMonitorBoundary only; do not inline a divergent copy.
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsWrite
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsDescribe
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorXRay
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorEc2Eni
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: ProcurementIngestSecrets
Effect: Allow
Action:
- secretsmanager:GetSecretValue
Resource:
- arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:011934824531:secret:procurement-ingest/web-ui-auth-token-ApAMmr
- arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:011934824531:secret:workorder-ingest/shoc-webhook-hmac-puYTcB
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: ProcurementIngestDynamoDB
Effect: Allow
Action:
- dynamodb:GetItem
- dynamodb:PutItem
- dynamodb:UpdateItem
- dynamodb:DeleteItem
- dynamodb:Query
- dynamodb:Scan
- dynamodb:BatchGetItem
- dynamodb:BatchWriteItem
- dynamodb:DescribeTable
- dynamodb:ConditionCheckItem
- dynamodb:GetRecords
- dynamodb:GetShardIterator
- dynamodb:DescribeStream
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/purchase-orders"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/purchase-orders/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/verified-sites"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/verified-sites/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/pending-site-review"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/pending-site-review/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/WorkOrders"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/WorkOrders/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/WorkOrderComments"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/WorkOrderComments/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/work-orders"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/work-orders/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/work-order-comments"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/work-order-comments/*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: ProcurementIngestS3
Effect: Allow
Action:
- s3:GetObject*
- s3:GetBucket*
- s3:List*
- s3:PutObject*
- s3:DeleteObject*
- s3:AbortMultipartUpload
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:s3:::po-ingest-emails-${AWS::AccountId}"
- !Sub "arn:aws:s3:::po-ingest-emails-${AWS::AccountId}/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:s3:::workorder-ingest-emails-${AWS::AccountId}"
- !Sub "arn:aws:s3:::workorder-ingest-emails-${AWS::AccountId}/*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: ProcurementIngestSqs
Effect: Allow
Action:
- sqs:SendMessage
- sqs:ReceiveMessage
- sqs:DeleteMessage
- sqs:GetQueueAttributes
- sqs:GetQueueUrl
- sqs:ChangeMessageVisibility
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:sqs:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:po-ingest-*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:sqs:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:WorkorderIngestStack-*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:sqs:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:workorder-shoc-emitter-*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: ProcurementIngestKms
Effect: Allow
Action:
- kms:Decrypt
- kms:DescribeKey
- kms:Encrypt
- kms:GenerateDataKey*
- kms:ReEncrypt*
Resource:
- arn:aws:kms:us-east-1:011934824531:key/be5fa4cb-c546-40fe-a13d-c7bec79f5d12
- arn:aws:kms:us-east-1:011934824531:key/d10fd1f0-a61a-4405-8568-85e9fd11ba18
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: ProcurementIngestBedrock
Effect: Allow
Action:
- bedrock:InvokeModel
- bedrock:InvokeModelWithResponseStream
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:bedrock:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:inference-profile/us.anthropic.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-v1:0"
- arn:aws:bedrock:us-east-1::foundation-model/anthropic.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-v1:0
- arn:aws:bedrock:us-east-2::foundation-model/anthropic.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-v1:0
- arn:aws:bedrock:us-west-2::foundation-model/anthropic.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-v1:0
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: ProcurementIngestSns
Effect: Allow
Action:
- sns:Publish
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:sns:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:site-alerts"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
MealOrderManagerBoundary:
Type: AWS::IAM::ManagedPolicy
Properties:
ManagedPolicyName: seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-meal-order-manager
Description: >-
Per-workload permissions boundary for meal-order-manager (PLAT-52).
Floor plus secrets, orders table, form/reports buckets, site-alerts,
SSM/invoke/execute-api, and SES. Shared policy remains the live-role
ceiling until app retarget.
PolicyDocument:
Version: "2012-10-17"
Statement:
# Floor aliases — edit the &lambdaBoundaryFloor* anchors on
# AfiBackupMonitorBoundary only; do not inline a divergent copy.
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsWrite
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsDescribe
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorXRay
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorEc2Eni
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: MealOrderManagerSecrets
Effect: Allow
Action:
- secretsmanager:GetSecretValue
Resource:
- arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:011934824531:secret:meal-order-manager/slack-bot-token-ZGmSGw
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: MealOrderManagerDynamoDB
Effect: Allow
Action:
- dynamodb:GetItem
- dynamodb:PutItem
- dynamodb:UpdateItem
- dynamodb:DeleteItem
- dynamodb:Query
- dynamodb:Scan
- dynamodb:BatchGetItem
- dynamodb:BatchWriteItem
- dynamodb:DescribeTable
- dynamodb:ConditionCheckItem
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/meal-order-manager-orders"
- !Sub "arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:table/meal-order-manager-orders/index/*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: MealOrderManagerS3
Effect: Allow
Action:
- s3:GetObject*
- s3:GetBucket*
- s3:List*
- s3:PutObject*
- s3:DeleteObject*
- s3:AbortMultipartUpload
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:s3:::meal-order-manager-form-${AWS::AccountId}"
- !Sub "arn:aws:s3:::meal-order-manager-form-${AWS::AccountId}/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:s3:::meal-order-manager-reports-${AWS::AccountId}"
- !Sub "arn:aws:s3:::meal-order-manager-reports-${AWS::AccountId}/*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: MealOrderManagerSns
Effect: Allow
Action:
- sns:Publish
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:sns:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:site-alerts"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: MealOrderManager
Effect: Allow
Action:
- ssm:GetParameter
- lambda:InvokeFunction
- execute-api:Invoke
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:ssm:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:parameter/meal-order-manager/*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:function:meal-order-manager-*"
- !Sub "arn:aws:execute-api:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:*/*/GET/api/publish/settings"
- !Sub "arn:aws:execute-api:us-east-1:${AWS::AccountId}:*/*/POST/api/publish/menu"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: MealOrderManagerSes
Effect: Allow
Action:
- ses:SendRawEmail
Resource: "*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
SeahavenSiteBoundary:
Type: AWS::IAM::ManagedPolicy
Properties:
ManagedPolicyName: seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-seahaven-site
Description: >-
Per-workload permissions boundary for githubdeploy-seahaven-site
(PLAT-91 / PLAT-52). Floor plus origin S3 and CloudFront invalidate.
Not a Lambda; hcptf guardrail still requires a listed boundary on
/tf-managed/ roles. Shared policy remains the live-role ceiling
until app retarget.
PolicyDocument:
Version: "2012-10-17"
Statement:
# Floor aliases — edit the &lambdaBoundaryFloor* anchors on
# AfiBackupMonitorBoundary only; do not inline a divergent copy.
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsWrite
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorLogsDescribe
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorXRay
- *lambdaBoundaryFloorEc2Eni
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: SeahavenSiteOriginS3
Effect: Allow
Action:
- s3:GetObject
- s3:PutObject
- s3:DeleteObject
- s3:GetObjectTagging
- s3:PutObjectTagging
- s3:ListBucket
- s3:GetBucketLocation
Resource:
- arn:aws:s3:::seahaven-site-prod
- arn:aws:s3:::seahaven-site-prod/*
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
- !If
- IsProdAccount
- Sid: SeahavenSiteCloudFrontInvalidate
Effect: Allow
Action:
- cloudfront:CreateInvalidation
- cloudfront:GetInvalidation
Resource:
- !Sub "arn:aws:cloudfront::${AWS::AccountId}:distribution/*"
- !Ref AWS::NoValue
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Shared CloudFormation execution role (SAM stacks) — INFRA-97 scoped
#
@ -736,9 +1121,10 @@ Resources:
#
# PRIMARY ESCALATION CONTROL
# iam:CreateRole and iam:AttachRolePolicy / iam:PutRolePolicy are
# conditioned on iam:PermissionsBoundary StringEquals the boundary ARN
# (seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary, created in INFRA-103). That
# condition is what prevents the CFN execution role from minting an
# conditioned on iam:PermissionsBoundary StringEquals an enumerated list
# of acceptable boundary ARNs (shared seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary
# plus each seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload>, PLAT-52).
# That condition is what prevents the CFN execution role from minting an
# unconstrained admin role.
#
# SAM RolePath deviation note
@ -1221,12 +1607,12 @@ Resources:
# This is the PRIMARY escalation control for INFRA-97.
#
# iam:CreateRole / iam:AttachRolePolicy / iam:PutRolePolicy are
# conditioned on iam:PermissionsBoundary StringEquals the
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary ARN. That condition means
# any role this execution role creates must have the boundary
# applied, so it can never exceed what the boundary allows (in
# THIS file the fleet-wide floor plus per-migration widenings;
# in mgmt's copy the five SAM stacks' service wildcards).
# conditioned on iam:PermissionsBoundary StringEquals an enumerated
# list: the shared seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary ARN plus each
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload> ARN (PLAT-52). That
# condition means any role this execution role creates must have a
# listed boundary applied, so it can never exceed what that boundary
# allows. Mgmt's .github copy still pins the unsuffixed ARN only.
#
# iam:PassRole is also included here so CloudFormation can pass
# the auto-generated Lambda execution role to the Lambda service.
@ -1263,7 +1649,13 @@ Resources:
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:role/*"
Condition:
StringEquals:
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": &acceptableLambdaBoundaries
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-afi-backup-monitor"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-front-integrations"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-procurement-ingest"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-meal-order-manager"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-seahaven-site"
# Attach managed policies — MUST have boundary already on role
- Sid: IAMAttachPolicyWithBoundary
@ -1274,7 +1666,7 @@ Resources:
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:role/*"
Condition:
StringEquals:
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": *acceptableLambdaBoundaries
# Put inline policy — MUST have boundary already on role
- Sid: IAMPutRolePolicyWithBoundary
@ -1285,7 +1677,7 @@ Resources:
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:role/*"
Condition:
StringEquals:
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": *acceptableLambdaBoundaries
# Boundary management — SET the boundary only. DELETE is NOT
# granted: for a delete, the iam:PermissionsBoundary condition key
@ -1307,7 +1699,7 @@ Resources:
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:role/*"
Condition:
StringEquals:
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": *acceptableLambdaBoundaries
# Explicit Deny backstop (AWS's documented NoBoundaryPolicyEdit /
# NoBoundaryDelete delegation pattern). A Deny is required, not

View file

@ -57,28 +57,32 @@ Description: >-
# protection in (4) but is attached ONLY to the security OU — extending it to
# prod/nonprod is the durable org-level fix and is tracked separately.
#
# COUPLING: the boundary ARN referenced in the Conditions below is
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary, created by the seahaven-deploy-substrate
# stack in the same account. The reference is a literal !Sub string inside
# Condition values, so CloudFormation infers NO ordering edge from it —
# bin/app.ts carries an explicit addStackDependency on the same-account
# deploy-substrate stack instead. The coupling is by NAME: if the boundary
# policy is ever renamed or replaced, every Condition below (and the
# deploy-substrate copy) must change in the same piece of work. INFRA-186
# (boundary reduced to a fleet-wide floor; per-workload boundaries are
# INFRA-187) changed the boundary's CONTENT, not its ARN, so this file is
# textually untouched — but the Terraform path IS affected: the Conditions
# below FORCE every role a Terraform apply creates onto that boundary, and
# the floor carries zero data-plane permissions. A migrating stack that
# creates Lambda execution roles must widen the boundary per the WIDENING
# PATH in lib/deploy-substrate/deploy-substrate.template.yaml, deployed
# before its first apply (README migration checklist step 2).
# COUPLING: acceptable boundary ARNs are an enumerated StringEquals list
# (PLAT-52): seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary plus each
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<workload>. The policies live in
# seahaven-deploy-substrate in the same account. The reference is a literal
# !Sub string inside Condition values, so CloudFormation infers NO ordering
# edge from it — bin/app.ts carries an explicit addStackDependency on the
# same-account deploy-substrate stack instead. The two files' allow-lists
# MUST match (mechanical sorted-JSON compare). Renaming the SHARED policy
# still fails silently. Adding a workload appends one ARN here AND creates
# the named policy in deploy-substrate. Do not use ArnLike on
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-*: the org-baseline deploy role can
# CreatePolicy via CFN. INFRA-186 changed the shared boundary's CONTENT, not
# its ARN. A migrating stack that creates Lambda execution roles must add
# seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-<stack> per the WIDENING PATH in
# lib/deploy-substrate/deploy-substrate.template.yaml, deployed before its
# first apply (README migration checklist step 3). Do not widen the shared
# document.
#
# SIZE BUDGET: an attached managed policy document is capped at 6,144
# characters (whitespace excluded). The statement set below is ~2.5 KB.
# Measure before adding statements — len(json.dumps(doc,separators=(',',':')))
# on the synthesized PolicyDocument — the same wall the role INLINE limit
# (10,240 bytes) put the first deploy-substrate deploy into on 2026-07-27.
# characters (whitespace excluded). The statement set below was ~2.5 KB
# before the PLAT-52 allow-list. Each extra boundary ARN is copied into
# four Sids. Measure before merging —
# len(json.dumps(doc,separators=(',',':'))) on the synthesized PolicyDocument
# — the same wall the role INLINE limit (10,240 bytes) put the first
# deploy-substrate deploy into on 2026-07-27. Compact size recorded after
# synth in this PR: 4693 characters / 10 statements (1451 headroom).
#
# PER-WORKSPACE ROLE ACCUMULATOR
# At each stack's migration, a PR appends to this template:
@ -200,7 +204,13 @@ Resources:
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:role/tf-managed/*"
Condition:
StringEquals:
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": &acceptableLambdaBoundaries
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-afi-backup-monitor"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-front-integrations"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-procurement-ingest"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-meal-order-manager"
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary-seahaven-site"
# Attach managed policies — MUST have boundary already on role
- Sid: IAMAttachPolicyWithBoundary
@ -211,7 +221,7 @@ Resources:
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:role/tf-managed/*"
Condition:
StringEquals:
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": *acceptableLambdaBoundaries
# Put inline policy — MUST have boundary already on role
- Sid: IAMPutRolePolicyWithBoundary
@ -222,7 +232,7 @@ Resources:
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:role/tf-managed/*"
Condition:
StringEquals:
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": *acceptableLambdaBoundaries
# Boundary management — SET only, never DELETE. For a delete, the
# iam:PermissionsBoundary condition key resolves to the boundary
@ -245,7 +255,7 @@ Resources:
- !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:role/tf-managed/*"
Condition:
StringEquals:
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": !Sub "arn:aws:iam::${AWS::AccountId}:policy/seahaven-lambda-execution-boundary"
"iam:PermissionsBoundary": *acceptableLambdaBoundaries
# Explicit Deny backstop (AWS's NoBoundaryPolicyEdit/NoBoundaryDelete
# delegation pattern). A Deny is required, not merely omitting the