proposal-system/api/src/ProposalSystem.Application/Validators/UpdateCustomerValidator.cs
Adam Moussa 1fca0fa978
feat: proposal delivery — email customers the PDF on Mark as Sent (#126)
* feat: proposal delivery — email customers the PDF on "Mark as Sent"

Makes the system's namesake feature real: marking a proposal Sent now emails the
customer an expiring link to the branded PDF, and customers are managed (with
contact emails) instead of hardcoded. v1 PR4.

API:
- Customer.ContactEmail + migration; Customer list/update endpoints. Search stays
  additive at GET /api/customers?query= (frozen-mobile + web compat); new paginated
  list at GET /api/customers/list (admin).
- IEmailService (SesEmailService v2 / DevEmailService, dev-gated). MarkSentAsync
  resolves the customer's email, presigns the latest PDF (7d), and sends via SES.
  Email/presign failures are caught + audited and NEVER roll back the Sent transition.
- Startup EF migration guarded by a Postgres advisory lock (concurrency-safe).

Infra:
- SES email identity (proposals@seahavenind.com); least-privilege ses:SendEmail/
  SendRawEmail scoped to the identity ARN + ses:FromAddress condition; SES_FROM_ADDRESS
  env. SES starts in sandbox — production access needed for unverified recipients.

Web:
- Customer management page (/admin/customers): list / create / edit incl. contact email.
- New-proposal form searches real customers (free-solo) instead of a hardcoded value.
- Mark-as-Sent dialog notes the PDF will be emailed to the customer.

GPT-4.1 cross-review (SES IAM): no BLOCK (ses:FromAddress condition applied).
Verified: api build + 121 tests; web tsc + 26 tests; infra tsc; ruff clean.

* Potential fix for pull request finding 'CodeQL / Exposure of private information'

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Potential fix for pull request finding 'CodeQL / Exposure of private information'

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Potential fix for pull request finding 'CodeQL / Exposure of private information'

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-18 12:40:55 -04:00

19 lines
568 B
C#

using FluentValidation;
using ProposalSystem.Application.DTOs;
namespace ProposalSystem.Application.Validators;
public class UpdateCustomerValidator : AbstractValidator<UpdateCustomerRequest>
{
public UpdateCustomerValidator()
{
RuleFor(x => x.Name)
.MaximumLength(200)
.When(x => x.Name != null);
RuleFor(x => x.ContactEmail)
.EmailAddress().WithMessage("Contact email must be a valid email address")
.MaximumLength(320)
.When(x => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(x.ContactEmail));
}
}