mirror of
https://github.com/Sea-Haven-Industries/payments-dashboard.git
synced 2026-09-30 21:43:11 +00:00
Some checks are pending
Deploy / deploy (push) Waiting to run
The deployed v2 pipeline was fully inert: the classifier never read detailText (where the live API carries the ACH DES:PAYMENTS text) and the handler keyed event dates off valueDate, which the API does not send (it sends asOfDate) — so ACH could not classify and no event of any kind could apply. Both proven against real captured responses. - classifyTransaction: detailText first in the description chain; Summary-row guard (new "summary" event); all-zeros customerReference normalizes to empty instead of fabricating check number 0. - BAI_CODE_EVENTS: empirical enumeration lands — 255 + 252 are both check-numbered return credits, 266 is the no-number return credit (text disambiguates ach_return vs electronic_return via new fallbackEvent semantics), 455 is ach_debit via DES text or ignored third-party autopay, 170/201/470/481 are noise. - postingDate helper (asOfDate ?? valueDate) drives both the sort and event dates; unmatched reason is now "missing posting date". - Default replay window widened to trailing 7 days ending yesterday: self-healing across missed runs; responses verified pagination-free. Refs: #66, #69
1032 lines
40 KiB
JavaScript
1032 lines
40 KiB
JavaScript
import { test } from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import {
|
|
BAI_CODE_EVENTS,
|
|
STALE_LIST_CAP,
|
|
amountsEqual,
|
|
applyEvent,
|
|
buildEventUpdate,
|
|
classifyTransaction,
|
|
digitsCorroborate,
|
|
isCancelStatus,
|
|
isValidISODate,
|
|
matchAchTransaction,
|
|
matchCheckTransaction,
|
|
matchElectronicReturn,
|
|
resolveDateRange,
|
|
sweepStalePayments,
|
|
vendorMatches,
|
|
} from "../src/boaRecon.js";
|
|
|
|
// Description fixtures are real statement lines from the 2026-07-21
|
|
// reconciliation (amounts/refs anonymized where they don't matter).
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: BAI code 475 is a check paid debit", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "475",
|
|
customerReference: "0001122200030",
|
|
bankReference: "813312345",
|
|
amount: "1,892.62",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_paid");
|
|
assert.equal(c.direction, "debit");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200030");
|
|
assert.equal(c.amount, 1892.62);
|
|
assert.equal(BAI_CODE_EVENTS["475"].event, "check_paid");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: statement-style 'Check <n>' description is check paid", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({ text: "Check 3176", amount: "-350" });
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_paid");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "3176");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: ARP refer-to-maker return credit", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "354",
|
|
text: "ARP RETURNED CHECK REFER TO MAKER CHECK # 1122200030 PAID DATE 02/19/26",
|
|
amount: "1,892.62",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.direction, "credit");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200030");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: return of posted check, check-numbered variant", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "RETURN OF POSTED CHECK / ITEM (RECEIVED ON 03-02) CHECK #1122200236",
|
|
amount: "3,350.00",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200236");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: return of posted check, electronic variant has no check number", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "RETURN OF POSTED CHECK / ITEM (RECEIVED ON 03-02) ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION",
|
|
amount: "3,992.15",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "electronic_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: ACH CCD debit without embedded payment number", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "FISK EXCAVATING DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 6814295 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Fisk Excavating Inc",
|
|
amount: "-650",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "ach_debit");
|
|
assert.equal(c.pmtId, "6814295");
|
|
assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, null);
|
|
assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Fisk Excavating Inc");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: ACH debit with embedded payment number", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "COBRA SEPTIC DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7584198 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Cobra Septic 21222000264",
|
|
amount: "-8,300.00",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "ach_debit");
|
|
assert.equal(c.pmtId, "7584198");
|
|
assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000264");
|
|
assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Cobra Septic");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: embedded payment number with internal space '21 222000273'", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "HALL PUMP SALES DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7617407 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Hall Pump Sales & Service Corporation 21 222000273",
|
|
amount: "-5,495.00",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000273");
|
|
assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Hall Pump Sales & Service Corporation");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: embedded payment number with internal space '2122200 0256'", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "STERLING SEPTIC DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7603631 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Sterling Septic & Plumbing, LLC. 2122200 0256",
|
|
amount: "-1,407.59",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000256");
|
|
assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Sterling Septic & Plumbing, LLC.");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: ACH reversal credit reusing PMT id is ach_return", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "SEA HAVEN INDUST DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7176466 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Sea Haven Industries, Inc 21222000128",
|
|
amount: "2,100.00",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "ach_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.pmtId, "7176466");
|
|
assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000128");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: short trailing digits are not an embedded payment number", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "SOME VENDOR DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 700001 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Vendor Company 2000",
|
|
amount: "-100.00",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, null);
|
|
assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Vendor Company 2000");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: unknown code on a check-shaped transaction is 'unknown', never dropped", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "699",
|
|
customerReference: "3301",
|
|
text: "SOMETHING NEW",
|
|
amount: "-100.00",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "unknown");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkShaped, true);
|
|
assert.equal(c.code, "699");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: transfers and misc bank activity are ignored", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "ACCOUNT TRANSFER TRSF FROM 483096772516",
|
|
amount: "15,000.00",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "ignored");
|
|
// Not check-shaped (no code, no reference, no CHECK text) -> ignored too.
|
|
const c2 = classifyTransaction({ text: "RETURN ITEM CHARGEBACK", amount: "-215" });
|
|
assert.equal(c2.event, "ignored");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("amountsEqual: comma-tolerant, sign-insensitive, zero never matches", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(amountsEqual("1,892.62", -1892.62), true);
|
|
assert.equal(amountsEqual(0, 0), false);
|
|
assert.equal(amountsEqual("", ""), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------- matcher
|
|
|
|
const payment = (over = {}) => ({
|
|
pk: `payment#${over.check_number ?? "1001"}`,
|
|
check_number: "1001",
|
|
method: "Check",
|
|
amount_usd: 500,
|
|
status: "Outstanding",
|
|
send_payment_on: "07/01/2026",
|
|
...over,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: check number AND amount must both match", () => {
|
|
const payments = [payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 500 })];
|
|
const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "1001", amount: 500 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, payments[0]);
|
|
assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "number+amount");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: number match with wrong amount NEVER falls through — human review", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 500 }),
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1002", amount_usd: 750.25, pk: "payment#1002" }),
|
|
];
|
|
// Altered-check / collapsed-posting signal: alert, no guessing.
|
|
const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "1001", amount: 750.25 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
assert.equal(m.unmatched, "number matched, amount mismatch");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: digit-dropped number we never issued recovers via corroborated amount fallback", () => {
|
|
// 1222000012 is a digit-subsequence of issued 11222000012.
|
|
const payments = [payment({ check_number: "11222000012", amount_usd: 6413 })];
|
|
const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "1222000012", amount: 6413 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "11222000012");
|
|
assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "amount");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: amount fallback without digit-subsequence corroboration is unmatched", () => {
|
|
// Same amount, but 9876 shares no digit-subsequence relation with 11222000012.
|
|
const payments = [payment({ check_number: "11222000012", amount_usd: 6413 })];
|
|
const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "9876", amount: 6413 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
assert.match(m.unmatched, /no corroborated amount fallback/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: check_return amount fallback requires a bank-confirmed candidate", () => {
|
|
const unconfirmed = [payment({ check_number: "11222000012", amount_usd: 6413 })];
|
|
const r1 = matchCheckTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "check_return", checkNumber: "1222000012", amount: 6413 },
|
|
unconfirmed,
|
|
"2026-07-20"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(r1.payment, undefined);
|
|
|
|
const confirmed = [
|
|
payment({ check_number: "11222000012", amount_usd: 6413, clear_status: "Cleared" }),
|
|
];
|
|
const r2 = matchCheckTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "check_return", checkNumber: "1222000012", amount: 6413 },
|
|
confirmed,
|
|
"2026-07-20"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(r2.payment.check_number, "11222000012");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("digitsCorroborate: digit-subsequence in either direction, nothing else", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(digitsCorroborate("1222000012", "11222000012"), true); // dropped digit
|
|
assert.equal(digitsCorroborate("11222000012", "1222000012"), true); // symmetric
|
|
assert.equal(digitsCorroborate("9876", "11222000012"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(digitsCorroborate("", "1234"), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: ambiguous amount fallback is unmatched — no write", () => {
|
|
// "101" digit-corroborates both 1001 and 1011; same amount -> ambiguous.
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 350 }),
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1011", amount_usd: 350, pk: "payment#1011" }),
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "101", amount: 350 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
assert.match(m.unmatched, /ambiguous/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: zero candidates is unmatched", () => {
|
|
const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "9999", amount: 123.45 }, [payment()], "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: amount fallback only considers checks issued in the last 120 days", () => {
|
|
// Corroborated ("101" is a subsequence of "1001") but issued too long ago.
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 350, send_payment_on: "01/02/2026" }),
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "101", amount: 350 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("matcher: non-Check payments are never check-match candidates", () => {
|
|
const payments = [payment({ method: "ACH", check_number: "21222000264", amount_usd: 350 })];
|
|
const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "21222000264", amount: 350 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("electronic return: unique amount among bank-confirmed payments matches", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 3992.15, clear_status: "Cleared" }),
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1002", amount_usd: 3992.15, pk: "payment#1002" }), // not bank-confirmed
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchElectronicReturn({ amount: 3992.15 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "1001");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("electronic return: never matches ACH payments", () => {
|
|
const achCleared = payment({
|
|
method: "ACH",
|
|
check_number: "21222000264",
|
|
amount_usd: 3992.15,
|
|
clear_status: "Cleared",
|
|
pk: "payment#21222000264",
|
|
});
|
|
const checkCleared = payment({
|
|
check_number: "1001",
|
|
amount_usd: 3992.15,
|
|
clear_status: "Cleared",
|
|
});
|
|
// Only the Check should be a candidate — ACH is excluded.
|
|
const m = matchElectronicReturn({ amount: 3992.15 }, [achCleared, checkCleared], "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "1001");
|
|
assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "amount+cleared");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("electronic return: ambiguity is unmatched", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 2500, clear_status: "Cleared" }),
|
|
payment({ check_number: "1002", amount_usd: 2500, clear_status: "Cleared", pk: "payment#1002" }),
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchElectronicReturn({ amount: 2500 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
assert.match(m.unmatched, /ambiguous/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ------------------------------------------------------------ transitions
|
|
|
|
const paidEvent = (over = {}) => ({
|
|
event: "check_paid",
|
|
amount: 500,
|
|
bankReference: "813300001",
|
|
...over,
|
|
});
|
|
const returnEvent = (over = {}) => ({
|
|
event: "check_return",
|
|
amount: 500,
|
|
bankReference: "813300002",
|
|
...over,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: paid debit sets BOTH status and clear_status to Cleared with dates", () => {
|
|
const p = payment();
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent(), "2026-07-19");
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.paid_date, "2026-07-19");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.cleared_date, "2026-07-19");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.bank_reference, "813300001");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(r.historyEvent, {
|
|
event: "check_paid",
|
|
date: "2026-07-19",
|
|
bankRef: "813300001",
|
|
amount: 500,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: return applies EVEN IF currently Cleared; clear_status is bank truth", () => {
|
|
const p = payment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Cleared" });
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, returnEvent(), "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "returned");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Returned");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.returned_date, "2026-07-20");
|
|
// status has no "Returned" rung on the CSV ladder — re-written unchanged.
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Cleared");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: second paid debit on a Returned check is a redeposit back to Cleared", () => {
|
|
const p = payment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Returned" });
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent({ bankReference: "813300003" }), "2026-07-21");
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "redeposit");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.paid_date, "2026-07-21");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: paid -> returned -> redeposit sequence accumulates history", () => {
|
|
const p = payment();
|
|
p.history = p.history || [];
|
|
const seq = [
|
|
[paidEvent(), "2026-07-18"],
|
|
[returnEvent(), "2026-07-19"],
|
|
[paidEvent({ bankReference: "813300004" }), "2026-07-20"],
|
|
];
|
|
const kinds = [];
|
|
for (const [ev, date] of seq) {
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, ev, date);
|
|
kinds.push(r.kind);
|
|
Object.assign(p, r.updates);
|
|
p.history.push(r.historyEvent);
|
|
}
|
|
assert.deepEqual(kinds, ["cleared", "returned", "redeposit"]);
|
|
assert.equal(p.clear_status, "Cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(p.history.length, 3);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
p.history.map((h) => h.event),
|
|
["check_paid", "check_return", "check_paid"]
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: return on a canceled record is terminal voided-and-bounced", () => {
|
|
const p = payment({ status: "Voided", clear_status: "Cleared" });
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, returnEvent(), "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "voided_and_bounced");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Returned");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Voided"); // cancel status stays visible
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: paid debit on a canceled record keeps the cancel status", () => {
|
|
const p = payment({ status: "Marked as Void" });
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent(), "2026-07-19");
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "cleared_on_canceled");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Marked as Void");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Cleared");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: identical replayed event is a noop (idempotent replays)", () => {
|
|
const p = payment({
|
|
status: "Cleared",
|
|
clear_status: "Cleared",
|
|
history: [{ event: "check_paid", date: "2026-07-19", bankRef: "813300001", amount: 500 }],
|
|
});
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent(), "2026-07-19");
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "noop");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: dedup identity is {event, date, amount} — bankRef differences are ignored", () => {
|
|
const p = payment({
|
|
status: "Cleared",
|
|
clear_status: "Cleared",
|
|
history: [{ event: "check_paid", date: "2026-07-19", bankRef: "OLD-FORMAT-REF", amount: 500 }],
|
|
});
|
|
// Same event replayed with a reformatted/omitted bankRef must still dedup.
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent({ bankReference: "813399999" }), "2026-07-19");
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "noop");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: a paid event dated on/before the latest return is a replayed original, not a redeposit", () => {
|
|
const p = payment({
|
|
status: "Cleared",
|
|
clear_status: "Returned",
|
|
history: [
|
|
{ event: "check_paid", date: "2026-07-18", bankRef: "a", amount: 500 },
|
|
{ event: "check_return", date: "2026-07-19", bankRef: "b", amount: 500 },
|
|
],
|
|
});
|
|
// Replayed original paid (different bankRef, date <= return date): noop.
|
|
const equalDate = applyEvent(p, paidEvent({ bankReference: "c" }), "2026-07-19");
|
|
assert.equal(equalDate.kind, "noop");
|
|
const beforeDate = applyEvent(p, paidEvent({ bankReference: "c" }), "2026-07-17");
|
|
assert.equal(beforeDate.kind, "noop");
|
|
// Strictly after the return: genuine redeposit.
|
|
const after = applyEvent(p, paidEvent({ bankReference: "c" }), "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.equal(after.kind, "redeposit");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("transitions: every non-noop result sets both status and clear_status", () => {
|
|
const cases = [
|
|
[payment(), paidEvent()],
|
|
[payment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Cleared" }), returnEvent()],
|
|
[payment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Returned" }), paidEvent()],
|
|
[payment({ status: "Voided" }), returnEvent()],
|
|
[payment({ clear_status: "Cleared" }), { event: "electronic_return", amount: 500, bankReference: "x" }],
|
|
];
|
|
for (const [p, ev] of cases) {
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, ev, "2026-07-20");
|
|
assert.notEqual(r.kind, "noop");
|
|
assert.ok("status" in r.updates, `${r.kind} must set status`);
|
|
assert.ok("clear_status" in r.updates, `${r.kind} must set clear_status`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("isCancelStatus covers the Stampli cancel vocabulary", () => {
|
|
for (const s of ["Voided", "cancelled", "Canceled", "Marked as Void"]) {
|
|
assert.equal(isCancelStatus(s), true);
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(isCancelStatus("Cleared"), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ------------------------------------------------------------ ACH (#69)
|
|
|
|
const achPayment = (over = {}) => ({
|
|
pk: `payment#${over.check_number ?? "21222000264"}`,
|
|
check_number: "21222000264",
|
|
method: "ACH",
|
|
payee: "Cobra Septic",
|
|
amount_usd: 8300,
|
|
status: "Payment Submitted",
|
|
send_payment_on: "06/02/2026",
|
|
...over,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: embedded payment number + amount wins", () => {
|
|
const payments = [achPayment(), achPayment({ check_number: "21222000265", pk: "payment#21222000265" })];
|
|
const m = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_debit", pmtId: "7584198", embeddedPaymentNumber: "21222000264", vendorText: "Cobra Septic", amount: 8300 },
|
|
payments,
|
|
"2026-06-08"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "21222000264");
|
|
assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "payment-number+amount");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: embedded number with wrong amount falls through to vendor+amount", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
achPayment({ check_number: "21222000264", amount_usd: 100 }),
|
|
achPayment({ check_number: "21222000265", pk: "payment#21222000265", amount_usd: 8300 }),
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_debit", pmtId: "7584198", embeddedPaymentNumber: "21222000264", vendorText: "Cobra Septic", amount: 8300 },
|
|
payments,
|
|
"2026-06-08"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "21222000265");
|
|
assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "vendor+amount");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: stored pmt_id attributes a reversal credit", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
achPayment({ pmt_id: "7584198", clear_status: "Cleared", status: "Cleared" }),
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_return", pmtId: "7584198", embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: "Sea Haven Industries, Inc", amount: 8300 },
|
|
payments,
|
|
"2026-06-10"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "pmt_id");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: vendor+amount only within send_payment_on -2..+14 days", () => {
|
|
// Reddi 21222000211: sent 5/27, debited 6/4 (8-day lag) must match...
|
|
const inWindow = [achPayment({ payee: "Reddi Services", send_payment_on: "05/27/2026", amount_usd: 1958 })];
|
|
const m1 = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_debit", pmtId: "1", embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: "Reddi Services", amount: 1958 },
|
|
inWindow,
|
|
"2026-06-04"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m1.matchedBy, "vendor+amount");
|
|
// ...but a posting 30 days after the send date must not.
|
|
const m2 = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_debit", pmtId: "1", embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: "Reddi Services", amount: 1958 },
|
|
inWindow,
|
|
"2026-06-26"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m2.payment, undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: PMT-id-less same-amount return credit matches a recently cleared ACH", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
achPayment({
|
|
payee: "Uline",
|
|
clear_status: "Cleared",
|
|
status: "Cleared",
|
|
cleared_date: "2026-05-22",
|
|
amount_usd: 19281.12,
|
|
}),
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_return", pmtId: null, embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: null, amount: 19281.12 },
|
|
payments,
|
|
"2026-05-26"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "amount+cleared");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: amount+cleared fallback requires cleared_date within 45 days before the credit", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
payee: "Uline",
|
|
clear_status: "Cleared",
|
|
status: "Cleared",
|
|
amount_usd: 19281.12,
|
|
};
|
|
const tooOld = [achPayment({ ...base, cleared_date: "2026-03-01" })];
|
|
const m1 = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_return", pmtId: null, embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: null, amount: 19281.12 },
|
|
tooOld,
|
|
"2026-05-26"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m1.payment, undefined);
|
|
|
|
const noDate = [achPayment({ ...base })];
|
|
const m2 = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_return", pmtId: null, embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: null, amount: 19281.12 },
|
|
noDate,
|
|
"2026-05-26"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m2.payment, undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: return credit with an unattributable PMT id is unmatched, never amount-guessed", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
achPayment({ clear_status: "Cleared", status: "Cleared", cleared_date: "2026-05-22", amount_usd: 8300 }),
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_return", pmtId: "999", embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: null, amount: 8300 },
|
|
payments,
|
|
"2026-05-26"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
assert.equal(m.unmatched, "unknown PMT id");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: pmt_id match with amount mismatch is unmatched — partial-reversal human case", () => {
|
|
const payments = [achPayment({ pmt_id: "7584198", amount_usd: 8300 })];
|
|
const m = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_return", pmtId: "7584198", embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: null, amount: 4150 },
|
|
payments,
|
|
"2026-06-10"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
assert.equal(m.unmatched, "pmt_id matched, amount mismatch");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: candidates with a DIFFERENT stored pmt_id are excluded from vendor+amount", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
achPayment({ pmt_id: "1111111", amount_usd: 8300 }),
|
|
achPayment({ check_number: "21222000270", pk: "payment#21222000270", amount_usd: 8300 }),
|
|
];
|
|
// Both are Cobra Septic @ 8300 in-window; the pmt_id conflict on the
|
|
// first disambiguates to the second instead of going ambiguous.
|
|
const m = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_debit", pmtId: "2222222", embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: "Cobra Septic", amount: 8300 },
|
|
payments,
|
|
"2026-06-08"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "21222000270");
|
|
assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "vendor+amount");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach matcher: ambiguity is unmatched — no write", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
achPayment({ pk: "payment#a", check_number: "a", clear_status: "Cleared", cleared_date: "2026-06-01", amount_usd: 500 }),
|
|
achPayment({ pk: "payment#b", check_number: "b", clear_status: "Cleared", cleared_date: "2026-06-02", amount_usd: 500 }),
|
|
];
|
|
const m = matchAchTransaction(
|
|
{ event: "ach_return", pmtId: null, embeddedPaymentNumber: null, vendorText: null, amount: 500 },
|
|
payments,
|
|
"2026-06-08"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
|
|
assert.match(m.unmatched, /ambiguous/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("vendorMatches: truncated bank originator vs full payee, punctuation-insensitive", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(vendorMatches("Hugill's Septic Service LLC", "Hugill's Septic Service LLC"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(vendorMatches("Alliance Sanitation LLC", "ALLIANCE SANITAT"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(vendorMatches("Cobra Septic", "Reddi Services"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(vendorMatches("", "Cobra Septic"), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("vendorMatches: prefix only counts at >= 10 normalized chars; short names need exact equality", () => {
|
|
// "ACME" (4 chars) must not claim "ACME Plumbing Co" by prefix...
|
|
assert.equal(vendorMatches("ACME Plumbing Co", "ACME"), false);
|
|
// ...but exact short-name equality still matches.
|
|
assert.equal(vendorMatches("ACME", "A.C.M.E."), true);
|
|
// 10+ char prefix still matches (truncated originators).
|
|
assert.equal(vendorMatches("Alliance Sanitation LLC", "ALLIANCESANITAT"), true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach transitions: settled debit clears both fields and persists pmt_id", () => {
|
|
const p = achPayment();
|
|
const r = applyEvent(
|
|
{ ...p },
|
|
{ event: "ach_debit", pmtId: "7584198", amount: 8300, bankReference: "905512345" },
|
|
"2026-06-04"
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.paid_date, "2026-06-04");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.pmt_id, "7584198");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach transitions: return credit then re-debit (bounce and re-settle)", () => {
|
|
const p = achPayment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Cleared", pmt_id: "7500000", history: [] });
|
|
const ret = applyEvent(p, { event: "ach_return", pmtId: "7500000", amount: 8300, bankReference: "r1" }, "2026-05-26");
|
|
assert.equal(ret.kind, "returned");
|
|
assert.equal(ret.updates.clear_status, "Returned");
|
|
assert.equal(ret.updates.returned_date, "2026-05-26");
|
|
Object.assign(p, ret.updates);
|
|
p.history.push(ret.historyEvent);
|
|
|
|
const redebit = applyEvent(p, { event: "ach_debit", pmtId: "7500000", amount: 8300, bankReference: "d2" }, "2026-06-01");
|
|
assert.equal(redebit.kind, "redeposit");
|
|
assert.equal(redebit.updates.status, "Cleared");
|
|
assert.equal(redebit.updates.clear_status, "Cleared");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("ach transitions: electronic return on a voided-but-settled ACH is voided-and-bounced", () => {
|
|
const p = achPayment({ status: "Voided", clear_status: "Cleared" });
|
|
const r = applyEvent(p, { event: "electronic_return", amount: 8300, bankReference: "r2" }, "2026-06-09");
|
|
assert.equal(r.kind, "voided_and_bounced");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Voided");
|
|
assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Returned");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// -------------------------------------------------- staleness sweep (F6)
|
|
|
|
test("stale sweep: unconfirmed ACH older than 16 days is listed; checks older than 60 days counted", () => {
|
|
const payments = [
|
|
achPayment({ check_number: "21222000300", send_payment_on: "06/20/2026" }), // 31d, stale
|
|
achPayment({ check_number: "21222000301", pk: "payment#21222000301", send_payment_on: "07/10/2026" }), // 11d, fresh
|
|
achPayment({ check_number: "21222000302", pk: "payment#21222000302", send_payment_on: "06/01/2026", clear_status: "Cleared" }), // confirmed
|
|
achPayment({ check_number: "21222000303", pk: "payment#21222000303", send_payment_on: "06/01/2026", status: "Voided" }), // cancel-exempt
|
|
payment({ check_number: "3001", send_payment_on: "04/01/2026" }), // check, 111d, stale
|
|
payment({ check_number: "3002", pk: "payment#3002", send_payment_on: "07/01/2026" }), // check, fresh
|
|
];
|
|
const s = sweepStalePayments(payments, "2026-07-21");
|
|
assert.equal(s.staleAchCount, 1);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(s.staleAch, [
|
|
{ check_number: "21222000300", amount: 8300, send_payment_on: "06/20/2026" },
|
|
]);
|
|
assert.equal(s.staleChecksCount, 1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("stale sweep: ACH list is capped, count is not", () => {
|
|
const payments = [];
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < STALE_LIST_CAP + 5; i++) {
|
|
payments.push(
|
|
achPayment({ check_number: `2122200${1000 + i}`, pk: `payment#s${i}`, send_payment_on: "06/01/2026" })
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const s = sweepStalePayments(payments, "2026-07-21");
|
|
assert.equal(s.staleAchCount, STALE_LIST_CAP + 5);
|
|
assert.equal(s.staleAch.length, STALE_LIST_CAP);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------- conditioned writes (F7)
|
|
|
|
test("buildEventUpdate: condition asserts the snapshot's status and clear_status", () => {
|
|
const p = payment({ status: "Outstanding", clear_status: "Cleared" });
|
|
const applied = applyEvent(p, returnEvent(), "2026-07-20");
|
|
const cmd = buildEventUpdate("Table", p, applied);
|
|
assert.equal(cmd.TableName, "Table");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(cmd.Key, { pk: p.pk });
|
|
assert.equal(cmd.ConditionExpression, "#c0 = :c0 AND #c1 = :c1");
|
|
assert.equal(cmd.ExpressionAttributeNames["#c0"], "status");
|
|
assert.equal(cmd.ExpressionAttributeNames["#c1"], "clear_status");
|
|
assert.equal(cmd.ExpressionAttributeValues[":c0"], "Outstanding");
|
|
assert.equal(cmd.ExpressionAttributeValues[":c1"], "Cleared");
|
|
assert.match(cmd.UpdateExpression, /^SET #history = list_append/);
|
|
// Every applied field is present in the SET clause.
|
|
const setFields = Object.entries(cmd.ExpressionAttributeNames)
|
|
.filter(([k]) => k.startsWith("#f"))
|
|
.map(([, v]) => v);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(setFields.sort(), Object.keys(applied.updates).sort());
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("buildEventUpdate: missing snapshot clear_status becomes attribute_not_exists", () => {
|
|
const p = payment(); // no clear_status yet
|
|
const applied = applyEvent(p, paidEvent(), "2026-07-19");
|
|
const cmd = buildEventUpdate("Table", p, applied);
|
|
assert.equal(cmd.ConditionExpression, "#c0 = :c0 AND attribute_not_exists(#c1)");
|
|
assert.equal(":c1" in cmd.ExpressionAttributeValues, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------- ReDoS hardening
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: bounded regexes still parse zero-padded and normal check descriptions", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({ text: "CHECK # 0003176", amount: "-350" });
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_paid");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "3176");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("classifier: pathological long input is bounded, classified without hanging", () => {
|
|
const junk = `CHECK ${" ".repeat(2000)}${"9".repeat(2000)}`;
|
|
const start = Date.now();
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({ text: junk, customerReference: "42", amount: "-1" });
|
|
assert.ok(Date.now() - start < 1000);
|
|
// Not parseable as a paid check -> unknown (check-shaped), never dropped.
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "unknown");
|
|
assert.ok(c.description.length <= 500);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ------------------------------------------------------------- date range
|
|
|
|
test("resolveDateRange: default is the trailing 7-day window ending yesterday", () => {
|
|
const r = resolveDateRange({}, new Date("2026-07-21T13:00:00Z"));
|
|
assert.deepEqual(r, { fromDate: "2026-07-14", toDate: "2026-07-20" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("resolveDateRange: explicit valid range passes through", () => {
|
|
const r = resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-06-16", toDate: "2026-06-23" });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(r, { fromDate: "2026-06-16", toDate: "2026-06-23" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("resolveDateRange: fromDate only replays a single day", () => {
|
|
const r = resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-06-08" });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(r, { fromDate: "2026-06-08", toDate: "2026-06-08" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("resolveDateRange: malformed and impossible dates throw, naming the offending value", () => {
|
|
assert.throws(() => resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "06/08/2026" }), /06\/08\/2026/);
|
|
assert.throws(() => resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-02-30" }), /2026-02-30/);
|
|
assert.throws(
|
|
() => resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-07-02", toDate: "2026-07-01" }),
|
|
/fromDate="2026-07-02", toDate="2026-07-01"/
|
|
);
|
|
assert.throws(() => resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-07-01; DROP", toDate: "2026-07-02" }));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("isValidISODate rejects non-strings and bad calendar dates", () => {
|
|
assert.equal(isValidISODate("2026-07-20"), true);
|
|
assert.equal(isValidISODate("2026-13-01"), false);
|
|
assert.equal(isValidISODate(20260720), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- Live-API field shapes (real captures, 2026-07-22; account/bank ids
|
|
// --- not part of transaction rows, amounts/refs/detailText verbatim) ---
|
|
|
|
test("live shape: 455 ACH debit classifies via detailText", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
asOfDate: "2026-07-22",
|
|
transactionCode: "455",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Preauthorized ACH Debit",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "14516.84",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Debit",
|
|
customerReference: "000000000000",
|
|
bankReference: "02023379940",
|
|
detailText:
|
|
"ALLIANCE SANITAT DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7854980 INDN:Sea Haven Industries CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Alliance Sanitation LLC 21222000280",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "ach_debit");
|
|
assert.equal(c.pmtId, "7854980");
|
|
assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000280");
|
|
assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Alliance Sanitation LLC");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("live shape: DES-less 455 is a third-party autopay, ignored not unknown", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "455",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Preauthorized ACH Debit",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "1850",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Debit",
|
|
customerReference: "000000000000",
|
|
detailText: "SOME UTILITY CO DES:AUTOPAY ID:12345 INDN:Sea Haven Industries CO ID:999 WEB",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "ignored");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("live shape: 255 return credit maps to check_return with number from ref", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
asOfDate: "2026-02-20",
|
|
transactionCode: "255",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Check Posted and Returned CR",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "1892.62",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
customerReference: "1122200030",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200030");
|
|
assert.equal(c.direction, "credit");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("live shape: 252 debit reversal credit maps to check_return; text agrees", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
asOfDate: "2026-06-16",
|
|
transactionCode: "252",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Debit Reversal Credit",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "6932.76",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
customerReference: "001122200802",
|
|
detailText: "061626 RETURN OF POSTED CHECK / ITEM (RECEIVED ON 06-16) CHECK #1122200802",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200802");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("live shape: 266 with electronic-return text stays electronic_return, no fabricated check number", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
asOfDate: "2026-06-16",
|
|
transactionCode: "266",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Return Item Credit",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "1555.13",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
customerReference: "000000000000",
|
|
detailText: "061626 RETURN OF POSTED CHECK / ITEM (RECEIVED ON 06-16) ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "electronic_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("266: ACH PMT text wins over the electronic_return fallback", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "266",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "4364.95",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
customerReference: "000000000000",
|
|
detailText:
|
|
"REDDI SERVICES DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7712345 INDN:Sea Haven Industries CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Reddi Services 21222000211",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "ach_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.pmtId, "7712345");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("266: bare row (code label only, no detailText) falls back to electronic_return", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "266",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Return Item Credit",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "360.00",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
customerReference: "000000000000",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "electronic_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("266: substantive text matching no classifier stays loud as unknown, never a write event", () => {
|
|
// Security review F1: a write-capable fallback must not fire on a row the
|
|
// classifiers could not read — amount-only Returned writes were reachable.
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "266",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Return Item Credit",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "360.00",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
customerReference: "000000000000",
|
|
detailText: "DEPOSITED ITEM RETURNED 12345",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "unknown");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkShaped, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("live-format return text with leading MMDDYY token classifies via regex", () => {
|
|
// Security review F2: the anchors must accept the live detailText prefix.
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "699",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
amount: "6932.76",
|
|
detailText: "061626 RETURN OF POSTED CHECK / ITEM (RECEIVED ON 06-16) CHECK #1122200802",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200802");
|
|
const e = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "699",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
amount: "360.00",
|
|
detailText: "061626 RETURN OF POSTED CHECK / ITEM (RECEIVED ON 06-16) ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(e.event, "electronic_return");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("unmapped code with all-zeros reference stays unknown, not silently ignored", () => {
|
|
// Security review F4: the zero-guard must not remove the shape signal.
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "275",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
customerReference: "000000000000",
|
|
amount: "4364.95",
|
|
detailText: "VENDOR DES:REVERSAL ID:123 CCD",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "unknown");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("reference fields are length-bounded", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "475",
|
|
customerReference: "9".repeat(500),
|
|
bankReference: "8".repeat(500),
|
|
amount: "1.00",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.ok(c.checkNumber.length <= 64);
|
|
assert.ok(c.bankReference.length <= 64);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("zero-reference guard: all-zeros customerReference never becomes check number 0", () => {
|
|
for (const ref of ["0", "0000", "000000000000"]) {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "255",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "100",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Credit",
|
|
customerReference: ref,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, null, `ref ${ref}`);
|
|
assert.equal(c.customerReference, "");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("summary rows classify as summary before any text matching", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
asOfDate: "2026-07-22",
|
|
transactionCode: "470",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Total Checks Paid Debit",
|
|
transactionType: "Summary",
|
|
amount: "4547.62",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "summary");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("noise codes are ignored even when check-shaped", () => {
|
|
for (const [code, desc] of [
|
|
["170", "Total Other Check Deposits CR"],
|
|
["201", "Individual Auto Transfer CR"],
|
|
["470", "Total Checks Paid Debit"],
|
|
["481", "Individual Loan Payment Debit"],
|
|
]) {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: code,
|
|
transactionDescription: desc,
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "100",
|
|
customerReference: "197",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "ignored", `code ${code}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("live shape: 475 check paid has no detailText; number rides in customerReference", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
asOfDate: "2026-06-16",
|
|
transactionCode: "475",
|
|
transactionDescription: "Check Paid",
|
|
transactionType: "Detail",
|
|
amount: "3350.00",
|
|
creditDebitIndicator: "Debit",
|
|
customerReference: "0001122200236",
|
|
bankReference: "813312345",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_paid");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200236");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("legacy statement-text fixtures still classify via the text fallback", () => {
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
text: "ARP RETURNED CHECK REFER TO MAKER CHECK # 1122200030 PAID DATE 02/19/26",
|
|
amount: "1,892.62",
|
|
transactionCode: "354",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200030");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("empty-string detailText does not shadow populated text (substantive chain)", () => {
|
|
// Open SWE review: ?? alone would let detailText:"" hide the statement text.
|
|
const c = classifyTransaction({
|
|
transactionCode: "699",
|
|
detailText: "",
|
|
text: "ARP RETURNED CHECK REFER TO MAKER CHECK # 1122200030 PAID DATE 02/19/26",
|
|
amount: "1,892.62",
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
|
|
assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200030");
|
|
});
|