feat(fetchboa): v2 return/redeposit-aware reconciliation (#66)

The two-code 475/255 filter missed every return on the Jan-Jul statement
(29 ARP refer-to-maker credits, 24 electronic return credits, and the
redeposit cycles), leaving 5 paid-then-returned checks stuck at Cleared
($5,256.62, vendors unpaid). Rewrite fetchBoaTransactions around a pure
reconciliation module (src/boaRecon.js) covered by node:test:

- BAI transaction-code event map (only 475 = check paid is confirmed;
  remaining codes pend the enumeration replay) with a description-text
  fallback classifier for ARP refer-to-maker, return-of-posted-check
  (check-numbered and electronic) and ACH DES:PAYMENTS formats. Unknown
  check-shaped transactions are logged and counted, never dropped.
- Matching on check number AND amount over all candidates; wrong-amount
  or collapsed-number postings fall back to a unique exact-amount match
  within checks issued in the last 120 days; ambiguity means unmatched
  with no write.
- Transitions always set BOTH status and clear_status (the missed
  returns slipped through the divergence between them). clear_status is
  bank truth: returns apply even to Cleared records, a second paid debit
  on a Returned check is a redeposit back to Cleared, and a return on a
  voided check is terminal voided-and-bounced. Every applied event is
  appended to a history list; identical replayed events are noops.
- Optional {fromDate, toDate} replay payload (strictly validated) for
  gap replays and the BAI-code enumeration runs; default stays
  yesterday.
- Each run writes a boa_recon#<runDate> summary item (90-day TTL) with
  per-event counts, unmatched check numbers/amounts, and unknown codes;
  unmatched/unknown also console.error (Slack alerting is #71).

ACH transactions are classified but not yet acted on; bank-confirming
ACH lands with #69.

README.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ AWS SAM application that ingests payment CSVs, syncs check data with Bank of Ame
 
 - **ProcessPayrollEmail** — Lambda triggered by S3 (inbound email) and SQS (batch timer). SES receives Gusto payroll emails at `payroll@int.seahaven.com`, stores them to S3, and this Lambda parses the email body, extracts financial data, and posts a combined Slack notification (employee payroll + contractor payments) after a 10-minute batching window. Runs outside VPC.
 - **ProcessPaymentCsv** — Lambda triggered by S3 CSV upload. Parses Stampli payment exports, upserts to DynamoDB, and submits new/cancelled checks to the CashPro Check Management API.
-- **FetchBoaTransactions** — Scheduled Lambda (weekdays 9am ET). Calls the CashPro Previous Day Transaction Inquiry API and matches cleared/returned checks back to DynamoDB records.
+- **FetchBoaTransactions** — Scheduled Lambda (weekdays 9am ET). Calls the CashPro Previous Day Transaction Inquiry API, classifies each transaction (paid checks, ARP refer-to-maker and return-of-posted-check credits, electronic returns), and reconciles them onto DynamoDB payment records. See [Bank reconciliation](#bank-reconciliation-fetchboatransactions).
 - **SlackAppHome** — Lambda behind API Gateway (`POST /slack/events`). Verifies the Slack signing secret (HMAC-SHA256, 5-minute replay window) before processing, then renders the payments dashboard on the Slack App Home tab with outstanding aging buckets and drill-down modals.
 
 - **ExpenseReceiver** — Lambda behind API Gateway (`POST /slack/expense-events`). Verifies the Slack signing secret (HMAC-SHA256), handles URL verification challenges, and async-invokes ExpenseProcessor. Runs outside VPC.
@@ -67,6 +67,29 @@ Two separate CashPro APIs are used, each with its own OAuth credentials:
 - Production: `https://api.bofa.com`
 - Sandbox: `https://api-sb.bofa.com`
 
+## Bank reconciliation (fetchBoaTransactions)
+
+The scheduled Lambda reconciles the Previous Day feed onto `payment#` records (pure logic lives in `src/boaRecon.js`, covered by `npm test`).
+
+**Classification.** Transactions are classified via a BAI transaction-code map (`BAI_CODE_EVENTS`; only 475 = check paid debit is empirically confirmed so far — the remaining codes are pending an enumeration replay over known event dates) with a fallback classifier over the statement description formats (ARP refer-to-maker, return-of-posted-check check-numbered and electronic variants, ACH CCD `DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT` lines). Unmapped codes on check-shaped transactions are logged (`console.error`) and counted in the run summary — never silently dropped.
+
+**Matching.** Check events match on check number AND amount, evaluating all candidates (bank postings can drop/collapse digits on long check numbers). A number match with the wrong amount — or an unknown number — falls back to an exact-amount match within checks issued in the last 120 days; zero or multiple fallback candidates means unmatched, and unmatched transactions are recorded in the run summary with no write. Electronic returns (no check number) match by exact amount among bank-confirmed payments.
+
+**State transitions.** Every write sets BOTH `status` and `clear_status` (`clear_status` is bank truth; "Cleared without a subsequent return is permanent" keys off it):
+
+| Bank event | Result |
+|---|---|
+| Paid debit | `status=Cleared`, `clear_status=Cleared`, `paid_date`, `cleared_date`, `bank_reference` |
+| Return credit (even if currently Cleared) | `clear_status=Returned`, `returned_date`; `status` re-written unchanged (the CSV ladder has no Returned rung) |
+| Second paid debit on a Returned check | Redeposit: back to Cleared with new dates |
+| Return on a Stampli-voided check | Terminal voided-and-bounced (`clear_status=Returned`, cancel status preserved), counted separately |
+
+Each applied event is appended to a `history` list attribute (`{event, date, bankRef, amount}`); identical replayed events are idempotent noops.
+
+**Replay.** The handler accepts an optional payload `{"fromDate": "YYYY-MM-DD", "toDate": "YYYY-MM-DD"}` (strictly validated; `toDate` defaults to `fromDate`; no payload = yesterday) for weekend/outage gap replays and BAI-code enumeration runs.
+
+**Run summary.** Each run writes a `boa_recon#<runDate>` item (90-day TTL) with counts per classified event type, matched/applied/redeposit/voided-and-bounced totals, the unmatched check numbers and amounts, and any unknown BAI codes encountered. Unmatched and unknown-code transactions also `console.error` (Slack alerting is tracked in #71).
+
 ## Documentation
 
 The canonical map of Sea Haven's AWS infrastructure lives in Confluence. This project's `payments-dashboard` stack is represented there as a Mermaid subgraph.

package.json

@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
   "files": [
     "src/"
   ],
+  "scripts": {
+    "test": "node --test \"tests/**/*.test.js\""
+  },
   "dependencies": {
     "@aws-sdk/client-dynamodb": "^3.1087.0",
     "@aws-sdk/client-lambda": "^3.1087.0",

src/boaRecon.js

@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+// Pure reconciliation logic for fetchBoaTransactions (payments-dashboard#66).
+// No AWS clients or environment access here so node:test can exercise the
+// classifier, matcher, and state transitions directly.
+
+import { toISODate } from "./dates.js";
+
+// Untrusted values (bank descriptions, references) must be JSON-encoded
+// before log interpolation — bank text can carry newlines, which would forge
+// CloudWatch log lines (CWE-117). Same rule as processPaymentCsv's logSafe.
+export const logSafe = (v) => JSON.stringify(String(v ?? "").slice(0, 128));
+
+// Comma-tolerant amount parsing ("1,234.56" bank strings and stored values).
+export const parseAmount = (value) => {
+  const num = parseFloat(String(value ?? "0").replace(/,/g, "").trim());
+  return isNaN(num) ? 0 : num;
+};
+
+const cents = (v) => Math.round(Math.abs(parseAmount(v)) * 100);
+
+// Sign-insensitive cent equality; zero never matches (a blank amount must
+// not pair with another blank amount).
+export const amountsEqual = (a, b) => cents(a) > 0 && cents(a) === cents(b);
+
+// BAI transaction-code -> event map. BoA's Previous Day feed uses standard
+// BAI type codes; only 475 (check paid, debit) is empirically confirmed so
+// far. The codes for ARP refer-to-maker return credits, return-of-posted-
+// check credits (check-numbered and electronic variants), ACH CCD debits and
+// return credits, and the true meaning of 255 (the old filter assumed
+// "returned check", unverified) are pending the enumeration replay over
+// known event dates (2/20, 3/31, 4/8, 6/16-6/23) — add them here as they
+// are confirmed. Until then classification falls back to description text,
+// and unmapped codes on check-shaped transactions are logged and counted,
+// never silently dropped.
+export const BAI_CODE_EVENTS = {
+  475: { event: "check_paid", direction: "debit" },
+};
+
+// Standard BAI ranges: 100-399 are credit type codes, 400-699 are debit
+// type codes. Used only when the feed carries no explicit indicator.
+export function directionFromCode(code) {
+  const n = parseInt(String(code ?? ""), 10);
+  if (!Number.isInteger(n)) return null;
+  if (n >= 100 && n < 400) return "credit";
+  if (n >= 400 && n < 700) return "debit";
+  return null;
+}
+
+export function directionOf(txn) {
+  const indicator = String(
+    txn.debitCreditIndicator ?? txn.creditDebitIndicator ?? ""
+  ).toUpperCase();
+  if (indicator.includes("DEBIT")) return "debit";
+  if (indicator.includes("CREDIT")) return "credit";
+  const fromCode = directionFromCode(txn.transactionCode);
+  if (fromCode) return fromCode;
+  const amt = parseAmount(txn.amount);
+  if (amt < 0) return "debit";
+  if (amt > 0) return "credit";
+  return null;
+}
+
+// Statement description formats observed on the 2026-07-21 reconciliation.
+const ARP_RETURN_RE = /^ARP RETURNED CHECK REFER TO MAKER CHECK #\s*(\d+)\b/i;
+const POSTED_RETURN_CHECK_RE =
+  /^RETURN OF POSTED CHECK \/ ITEM \(RECEIVED ON \d{2}-\d{2}\)\s*CHECK #\s*(\d+)\b/i;
+const POSTED_RETURN_ELECTRONIC_RE =
+  /^RETURN OF POSTED CHECK \/ ITEM \(RECEIVED ON \d{2}-\d{2}\)\s*ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION\b/i;
+const ACH_PMT_RE = /DES:PAYMENTS\s+ID:PMT\s*(\d+)/i;
+const PMT_INFO_RE = /PMT INFO:\s*(.*)$/i;
+const CHECK_PAID_RE = /^CHECK\s*#?\s*(\d+)$/i;
+// Trailing digit run at the end of PMT INFO — Stampli recently started
+// embedding the payment number there, and the bank wraps it with arbitrary
+// internal spaces ("21 222000108", "2122200 0256").
+const EMBEDDED_NUMBER_RE = /(\d[\d ]{6,}\d)\s*$/;
+
+const stripLeadingZeros = (s) => String(s ?? "").replace(/^0+(?=\d)/, "");
+
+// Classify one Previous Day transaction into a reconciliation event.
+// Precedence: confirmed BAI code map first, then description text. Anything
+// unmapped that still looks check/payment-shaped comes back as "unknown" so
+// the caller can log and count it — never silently drop it. Everything else
+// (transfers, misc bank activity) is "ignored".
+export function classifyTransaction(txn) {
+  const code = String(txn.transactionCode ?? "").trim();
+  const description = String(
+    txn.text ?? txn.description ?? txn.transactionDescription ?? ""
+  ).trim();
+  const customerReference = stripLeadingZeros(String(txn.customerReference ?? "").trim());
+  const bankReference = String(txn.bankReference ?? "").trim();
+  const amount = Math.abs(parseAmount(txn.amount));
+  const direction = BAI_CODE_EVENTS[code]?.direction ?? directionOf(txn);
+
+  const base = {
+    code,
+    description,
+    customerReference,
+    bankReference,
+    amount,
+    direction,
+    checkNumber: null,
+    pmtId: null,
+    embeddedPaymentNumber: null,
+    vendorText: null,
+    checkShaped: false,
+  };
+
+  // Description facts, extracted regardless of code so a code-mapped event
+  // still carries the check number / PMT id it references.
+  let descriptionEvent = null;
+  let m;
+  if ((m = ARP_RETURN_RE.exec(description))) {
+    descriptionEvent = "check_return";
+    base.checkNumber = stripLeadingZeros(m[1]);
+  } else if ((m = POSTED_RETURN_CHECK_RE.exec(description))) {
+    descriptionEvent = "check_return";
+    base.checkNumber = stripLeadingZeros(m[1]);
+  } else if (POSTED_RETURN_ELECTRONIC_RE.test(description)) {
+    descriptionEvent = "electronic_return";
+  } else if ((m = ACH_PMT_RE.exec(description))) {
+    base.pmtId = m[1];
+    const info = PMT_INFO_RE.exec(description);
+    if (info) {
+      let vendorText = info[1].trim();
+      const embedded = EMBEDDED_NUMBER_RE.exec(vendorText);
+      if (embedded && embedded[1].replace(/ /g, "").length >= 8) {
+        base.embeddedPaymentNumber = embedded[1].replace(/ /g, "");
+        vendorText = vendorText.slice(0, embedded.index).trim();
+      }
+      base.vendorText = vendorText || null;
+    }
+    if (direction === "debit") descriptionEvent = "ach_debit";
+    else if (direction === "credit") descriptionEvent = "ach_return";
+    // direction unknown -> leave null; falls through to "unknown" below.
+  } else if ((m = CHECK_PAID_RE.exec(description))) {
+    descriptionEvent = "check_paid";
+    base.checkNumber = stripLeadingZeros(m[1]);
+  }
+
+  const event = BAI_CODE_EVENTS[code]?.event ?? descriptionEvent;
+
+  if (event === "check_paid" && !base.checkNumber) {
+    base.checkNumber = customerReference || null;
+  }
+  if (event === "check_return" && !base.checkNumber) {
+    base.checkNumber = customerReference || null;
+  }
+
+  if (event) return { ...base, event };
+
+  base.checkShaped =
+    Boolean(customerReference) || /CHECK/i.test(description) || Boolean(base.pmtId);
+  return { ...base, event: base.checkShaped ? "unknown" : "ignored" };
+}
+
+// Days from a stored Stampli send date (canonical MM/DD/YYYY) to an ISO
+// reference date; null when the stored date does not parse.
+function daysSinceIssue(payment, refISO) {
+  const iso = toISODate(payment.send_payment_on);
+  if (!iso) return null;
+  return Math.round((Date.parse(refISO) - Date.parse(iso)) / 86400000);
+}
+
+const issuedWithinDays = (payment, refISO, days) => {
+  const d = daysSinceIssue(payment, refISO);
+  return d !== null && d >= 0 && d <= days;
+};
+
+// Match a check event (paid debit or return credit) against payment records.
+// Match on check number AND amount, evaluating all candidates — never
+// first-match on number alone: bank postings drop/collapse digits on long
+// check numbers, so a posting under one number can belong to another check
+// (or to a number we never issued). When the number matches but the amount
+// does not — or the number is unknown — fall back to an exact-amount match
+// within checks issued in the last 120 days. Anything but a single fallback
+// candidate is unmatched: no write on ambiguity.
+export function matchCheckTransaction(classified, payments, refDateISO) {
+  const { checkNumber, amount } = classified;
+  const checks = payments.filter((p) => p.method === "Check" && p.check_number);
+
+  const numberMatches = checkNumber
+    ? checks.filter((p) => p.check_number === checkNumber)
+    : [];
+  const exact = numberMatches.filter((p) => amountsEqual(p.amount_usd, amount));
+  if (exact.length === 1) return { payment: exact[0], matchedBy: "number+amount" };
+  if (exact.length > 1) return { unmatched: "multiple number+amount matches" };
+
+  const fallback = checks.filter(
+    (p) => amountsEqual(p.amount_usd, amount) && issuedWithinDays(p, refDateISO, 120)
+  );
+  if (fallback.length === 1) return { payment: fallback[0], matchedBy: "amount" };
+  if (fallback.length > 1) {
+    return { unmatched: `amount fallback ambiguous (${fallback.length} candidates)` };
+  }
+  return {
+    unmatched: numberMatches.length
+      ? "number matched with wrong amount; no unique amount fallback"
+      : "no number match; no unique amount fallback",
+  };
+}
+
+// Electronic return credits carry no check number at all. Match by exact
+// amount among bank-confirmed payments issued in the last 120 days
+// (clear_status Cleared, or Returned so replays of an already-applied
+// return dedupe to a noop instead of alerting). Ambiguity is unmatched.
+export function matchElectronicReturn(classified, payments, refDateISO) {
+  const candidates = payments.filter(
+    (p) =>
+      (p.clear_status === "Cleared" || p.clear_status === "Returned") &&
+      amountsEqual(p.amount_usd, classified.amount) &&
+      issuedWithinDays(p, refDateISO, 120)
+  );
+  if (candidates.length === 1) return { payment: candidates[0], matchedBy: "amount+cleared" };
+  if (candidates.length > 1) {
+    return { unmatched: `electronic return ambiguous (${candidates.length} candidates)` };
+  }
+  return { unmatched: "no bank-confirmed payment with this amount" };
+}
+
+const CANCEL_STATUSES = ["voided", "cancelled", "canceled", "marked as void"];
+export const isCancelStatus = (s) => CANCEL_STATUSES.includes(String(s ?? "").toLowerCase());
+
+// Decide the DDB write for a matched bank event. Pure: returns the fields
+// to set plus the history entry; the handler turns it into an UpdateCommand
+// and mirrors the fields onto its in-memory copy.
+//
+// Invariant: every non-noop result sets BOTH status and clear_status — the
+// 2026-07-21 reconciliation traced five missed returns ($5,256.62) to
+// writers touching one field but not the other.
+//
+// Status semantics (documented decision, #66): `clear_status` is bank truth
+// ("Cleared without a subsequent return is permanent" keys off it). `status`
+// stays on the CSV lifecycle ladder, which has no "Returned" rung, so on a
+// return it is re-written with its current value to keep the both-fields
+// invariant; consumers that need bounce visibility read clear_status. On a
+// paid debit against a canceled record (a voided check the bank paid —
+// expected without Positive Pay), the cancel status is likewise preserved:
+// the ARP return that follows lands as terminal voided-and-bounced.
+export function applyEvent(payment, classified, eventDateISO) {
+  const { event, amount, bankReference } = classified;
+  const canceled = isCancelStatus(payment.status);
+  const historyEvent = {
+    event,
+    date: eventDateISO,
+    bankRef: bankReference,
+    amount,
+  };
+
+  // Replay idempotence: an identical event already recorded in history is a
+  // noop, so re-running a date range never double-applies transitions.
+  const alreadyApplied = (payment.history || []).some(
+    (h) =>
+      h.event === historyEvent.event &&
+      h.date === historyEvent.date &&
+      h.bankRef === historyEvent.bankRef &&
+      amountsEqual(h.amount, amount)
+  );
+  if (alreadyApplied) return { kind: "noop", updates: null, historyEvent: null };
+
+  if (event === "check_paid" || event === "ach_debit") {
+    const redeposit = payment.clear_status === "Returned";
+    const updates = {
+      status: canceled ? payment.status : "Cleared",
+      clear_status: "Cleared",
+      paid_date: eventDateISO,
+      cleared_date: eventDateISO,
+      bank_reference: bankReference,
+    };
+    if (event === "ach_debit" && classified.pmtId) updates.pmt_id = classified.pmtId;
+    return {
+      kind: redeposit ? "redeposit" : canceled ? "cleared_on_canceled" : "cleared",
+      updates,
+      historyEvent,
+    };
+  }
+
+  if (event === "check_return" || event === "electronic_return" || event === "ach_return") {
+    const updates = {
+      status: payment.status ?? "",
+      clear_status: "Returned",
+      returned_date: eventDateISO,
+      bank_reference: bankReference,
+    };
+    if (event === "ach_return" && classified.pmtId) updates.pmt_id = classified.pmtId;
+    return {
+      // A return against a canceled record is the expected void-then-bounce
+      // ARP cycle: terminal voided-and-bounced, counted separately.
+      kind: canceled ? "voided_and_bounced" : "returned",
+      updates,
+      historyEvent,
+    };
+  }
+
+  return { kind: "noop", updates: null, historyEvent: null };
+}
+
+const ISO_DATE_RE = /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/;
+
+export function isValidISODate(s) {
+  if (typeof s !== "string" || !ISO_DATE_RE.test(s)) return false;
+  const [y, mo, d] = s.split("-").map(Number);
+  const dt = new Date(Date.UTC(y, mo - 1, d));
+  return (
+    dt.getUTCFullYear() === y && dt.getUTCMonth() === mo - 1 && dt.getUTCDate() === d
+  );
+}
+
+// Optional {fromDate, toDate} replay payload; the default stays yesterday,
+// matching the previous-day inquiry cadence. Strings are validated strictly
+// so a malformed payload fails loudly instead of querying a garbage range.
+export function resolveDateRange(event, now = new Date()) {
+  const hasFrom = event?.fromDate != null;
+  const hasTo = event?.toDate != null;
+  if (!hasFrom && !hasTo) {
+    const yesterday = new Date(now.getTime() - 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000);
+    const d = yesterday.toISOString().split("T")[0];
+    return { fromDate: d, toDate: d };
+  }
+  const fromDate = hasFrom ? event.fromDate : event.toDate;
+  const toDate = hasTo ? event.toDate : event.fromDate;
+  if (!isValidISODate(fromDate) || !isValidISODate(toDate)) {
+    throw new Error("fromDate/toDate must be valid YYYY-MM-DD strings");
+  }
+  if (fromDate > toDate) {
+    throw new Error("fromDate must be <= toDate");
+  }
+  return { fromDate, toDate };
+}

src/fetchBoaTransactions.js

@@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
 import { DynamoDBClient } from "@aws-sdk/client-dynamodb";
-import { DynamoDBDocumentClient, ScanCommand, UpdateCommand } from "@aws-sdk/lib-dynamodb";
+import { DynamoDBDocumentClient, PutCommand, ScanCommand, UpdateCommand } from "@aws-sdk/lib-dynamodb";
 import { SecretsManagerClient, GetSecretValueCommand } from "@aws-sdk/client-secrets-manager";
+import {
+  applyEvent,
+  classifyTransaction,
+  isValidISODate,
+  logSafe,
+  matchCheckTransaction,
+  matchElectronicReturn,
+  resolveDateRange,
+} from "./boaRecon.js";
 
 const ddb = DynamoDBDocumentClient.from(new DynamoDBClient());
 const secrets = new SecretsManagerClient();
@@ -28,24 +37,21 @@ async function getAccessToken(applicationID, clientId, clientSecret) {
   });
 
   if (!res.ok) {
-    const text = await res.text();
-    throw new Error(`OAuth token exchange failed: ${res.status} - ${text}`);
+    throw new Error(`OAuth token exchange failed: HTTP ${res.status}`);
   }
 
   const data = await res.json();
   return data.access_token;
 }
 
-export const handler = async () => {
+export const handler = async (event) => {
+  // Optional replay payload {fromDate, toDate}; default is yesterday.
+  const { fromDate, toDate } = resolveDateRange(event ?? {});
+
   const { appId, clientId, token: clientSecret, accountNumber, bankId } = await getReportingCreds();
 
   const bearerToken = await getAccessToken(appId, clientId, clientSecret);
 
-  // Get yesterday's date in YYYY-MM-DD
-  const yesterday = new Date();
-  yesterday.setDate(yesterday.getDate() - 1);
-  const dateStr = yesterday.toISOString().split("T")[0];
-
   // Call CashPro Previous Day Transaction Inquiry
   const res = await fetch(`${BOA_BASE_URL}/cashpro/reporting/v1/transaction-inquiries/previous-day`, {
     method: "POST",
@@ -54,15 +60,14 @@ export const handler = async () => {
       Authorization: `Bearer ${bearerToken}`,
     },
     body: JSON.stringify({
-      fromDate: dateStr,
-      toDate: dateStr,
+      fromDate,
+      toDate,
       accounts: [{ accountNumber, bankId }],
     }),
   });
 
   if (!res.ok) {
-    const text = await res.text();
-    throw new Error(`BoA API error ${res.status}: ${text}`);
+    throw new Error(`BoA API error: HTTP ${res.status}`);
   }
 
   const data = await res.json();
@@ -72,17 +77,14 @@ export const handler = async () => {
     (acct) => acct.transactions || []
   );
 
-  // Filter for cleared checks (475) and returned checks (255)
-  const relevant = allTransactions.filter(
-    (t) => t.transactionCode === "475" || t.transactionCode === "255"
+  // Process in posting-date order so multi-day replays apply paid -> return
+  // -> redeposit sequences in the order the bank did.
+  allTransactions.sort((a, b) =>
+    String(a.valueDate ?? "").localeCompare(String(b.valueDate ?? ""))
   );
 
-  if (!relevant.length) {
-    console.log(`No check transactions (475/255) found for ${dateStr}`);
-    return { statusCode: 200, body: `No relevant transactions for ${dateStr}` };
-  }
-
-  // Load all check payments from DynamoDB to match against
+  // Load check payments from DynamoDB to match against. (#69 extends this
+  // to ACH by dropping the method filter.)
   const payments = [];
   let lastKey;
   do {
@@ -99,44 +101,147 @@ export const handler = async () => {
     lastKey = result.LastEvaluatedKey;
   } while (lastKey);
 
-  let matched = 0;
+  const summary = {
+    transactions_seen: allTransactions.length,
+    classified: {},
+    matched: 0,
+    applied: 0,
+    already_applied: 0,
+    redeposits: 0,
+    voided_and_bounced: 0,
+    unmatched: [],
+    unknown_codes: {},
+  };
 
-  for (const txn of relevant) {
-    const custRef = (txn.customerReference || "").replace(/^0+/, "");
-    const bankRef = txn.bankReference || "";
+  for (const txn of allTransactions) {
+    const classified = classifyTransaction(txn);
+    summary.classified[classified.event] = (summary.classified[classified.event] || 0) + 1;
 
-    // Match customerReference (check number with leading zeros stripped) to our check_number
-    const matchedPayment = payments.find((p) =>
-      p.check_number && p.check_number === custRef
+    if (classified.event === "ignored") continue;
+
+    if (classified.event === "unknown") {
+      summary.unknown_codes[classified.code || "?"] =
+        (summary.unknown_codes[classified.code || "?"] || 0) + 1;
+      console.error(
+        `Unknown check-shaped transaction: code=${logSafe(classified.code)}, ` +
+          `description=${logSafe(classified.description)}, ` +
+          `ref=${logSafe(classified.customerReference)}, amount=${classified.amount}`
       );
-
-    if (!matchedPayment) {
-      console.log(`No match for customerReference: ${txn.customerReference} (bankRef: ${bankRef})`);
       continue;
     }
 
-    const clearStatus = txn.transactionCode === "475" ? "Cleared" : "Returned";
+    if (classified.event === "ach_debit" || classified.event === "ach_return") {
+      // ACH bank confirmation lands with #69.
+      console.log(`ACH ${classified.event} classified (PMT ${logSafe(classified.pmtId)}); deferred to #69`);
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    const eventDate = isValidISODate(txn.valueDate) ? txn.valueDate : toDate;
+
+    const match =
+      classified.event === "electronic_return"
+        ? matchElectronicReturn(classified, payments, eventDate)
+        : matchCheckTransaction(classified, payments, eventDate);
+
+    if (!match.payment) {
+      summary.unmatched.push({
+        event: classified.event,
+        check_number: classified.checkNumber,
+        amount: classified.amount,
+        reason: match.unmatched,
+      });
+      console.error(
+        `Unmatched ${classified.event}: check=${logSafe(classified.checkNumber)}, ` +
+          `amount=${classified.amount}, reason=${match.unmatched} ` +
+          `(bankRef: ${logSafe(classified.bankReference)})`
+      );
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    summary.matched++;
+    const applied = applyEvent(match.payment, classified, eventDate);
+    if (applied.kind === "noop") {
+      summary.already_applied++;
+      continue;
+    }
+    if (applied.kind === "redeposit") summary.redeposits++;
+    if (applied.kind === "voided_and_bounced") summary.voided_and_bounced++;
+
+    const sets = ["#history = list_append(if_not_exists(#history, :empty), :hist)"];
+    const names = { "#history": "history" };
+    const values = { ":empty": [], ":hist": [applied.historyEvent] };
+    Object.entries(applied.updates).forEach(([field, value], i) => {
+      names[`#f${i}`] = field;
+      values[`:v${i}`] = value;
+      sets.push(`#f${i} = :v${i}`);
+    });
 
     await ddb.send(
       new UpdateCommand({
         TableName: TABLE_NAME,
-        Key: { pk: matchedPayment.pk },
-        UpdateExpression: "SET clear_status = :status, bank_reference = :ref, cleared_date = :date",
-        ExpressionAttributeValues: {
-          ":status": clearStatus,
-          ":ref": bankRef,
-          ":date": txn.valueDate || dateStr,
+        Key: { pk: match.payment.pk },
+        UpdateExpression: `SET ${sets.join(", ")}`,
+        ExpressionAttributeNames: names,
+        ExpressionAttributeValues: values,
+      })
+    );
+    summary.applied++;
+
+    // Mirror the write onto the in-memory copy so later transactions in the
+    // same run (return after paid, redeposit after return) see current state.
+    Object.assign(match.payment, applied.updates);
+    match.payment.history = [...(match.payment.history || []), applied.historyEvent];
+
+    console.log(
+      `${applied.kind}: check ${logSafe(match.payment.check_number)} via ${match.matchedBy} ` +
+        `(bankRef: ${logSafe(classified.bankReference)})`
+    );
+  }
+
+  // Run summary record for auditing/alerting (Slack wiring is #71).
+  const runDate = fromDate === toDate ? fromDate : `${fromDate}_${toDate}`;
+  await ddb.send(
+    new PutCommand({
+      TableName: TABLE_NAME,
+      Item: {
+        pk: `boa_recon#${runDate}`,
+        run_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+        from_date: fromDate,
+        to_date: toDate,
+        transactions_seen: summary.transactions_seen,
+        classified: summary.classified,
+        matched: summary.matched,
+        applied: summary.applied,
+        already_applied: summary.already_applied,
+        redeposits: summary.redeposits,
+        voided_and_bounced: summary.voided_and_bounced,
+        unmatched_count: summary.unmatched.length,
+        unmatched: summary.unmatched,
+        unknown_codes: summary.unknown_codes,
+        ttl: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 90 * 24 * 60 * 60,
       },
     })
   );
 
-    matched++;
-    console.log(`${clearStatus}: check ${matchedPayment.check_number} (bankRef: ${bankRef})`);
+  const unknownCount = Object.values(summary.unknown_codes).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
+  if (summary.unmatched.length || unknownCount) {
+    console.error(
+      `Reconciliation ${fromDate}..${toDate}: ${summary.unmatched.length} unmatched, ` +
+        `${unknownCount} unknown-code transactions (see boa_recon#${runDate})`
+    );
   }
 
-  console.log(`Processed ${relevant.length} transactions, matched ${matched} payments`);
+  console.log(
+    `Processed ${summary.transactions_seen} transactions ${fromDate}..${toDate}: ` +
+      `${summary.matched} matched, ${summary.applied} applied, ` +
+      `${summary.already_applied} already applied, ${summary.redeposits} redeposits, ` +
+      `${summary.voided_and_bounced} voided-and-bounced, ${summary.unmatched.length} unmatched`
+  );
+
   return {
     statusCode: 200,
-    body: `${matched} of ${relevant.length} transactions matched to payments`,
+    body:
+      `${summary.matched} of ${summary.transactions_seen} transactions matched ` +
+      `(${summary.applied} applied, ${summary.unmatched.length} unmatched)`,
   };
 };

tests/boaRecon.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
+import { test } from "node:test";
+import assert from "node:assert/strict";
+import {
+  BAI_CODE_EVENTS,
+  amountsEqual,
+  applyEvent,
+  classifyTransaction,
+  isCancelStatus,
+  isValidISODate,
+  matchCheckTransaction,
+  matchElectronicReturn,
+  resolveDateRange,
+} from "../src/boaRecon.js";
+
+// Description fixtures are real statement lines from the 2026-07-21
+// reconciliation (amounts/refs anonymized where they don't matter).
+
+test("classifier: BAI code 475 is a check paid debit", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    transactionCode: "475",
+    customerReference: "0001122200030",
+    bankReference: "813312345",
+    amount: "1,892.62",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "check_paid");
+  assert.equal(c.direction, "debit");
+  assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200030");
+  assert.equal(c.amount, 1892.62);
+  assert.equal(BAI_CODE_EVENTS["475"].event, "check_paid");
+});
+
+test("classifier: statement-style 'Check <n>' description is check paid", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({ text: "Check 3176", amount: "-350" });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "check_paid");
+  assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "3176");
+});
+
+test("classifier: ARP refer-to-maker return credit", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    transactionCode: "354",
+    text: "ARP RETURNED CHECK REFER TO MAKER CHECK # 1122200030 PAID DATE 02/19/26",
+    amount: "1,892.62",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
+  assert.equal(c.direction, "credit");
+  assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200030");
+});
+
+test("classifier: return of posted check, check-numbered variant", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "RETURN OF POSTED CHECK / ITEM (RECEIVED ON 03-02) CHECK #1122200236",
+    amount: "3,350.00",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "check_return");
+  assert.equal(c.checkNumber, "1122200236");
+});
+
+test("classifier: return of posted check, electronic variant has no check number", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "RETURN OF POSTED CHECK / ITEM (RECEIVED ON 03-02) ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION",
+    amount: "3,992.15",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "electronic_return");
+  assert.equal(c.checkNumber, null);
+});
+
+test("classifier: ACH CCD debit without embedded payment number", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "FISK EXCAVATING DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 6814295 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Fisk Excavating Inc",
+    amount: "-650",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "ach_debit");
+  assert.equal(c.pmtId, "6814295");
+  assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, null);
+  assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Fisk Excavating Inc");
+});
+
+test("classifier: ACH debit with embedded payment number", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "COBRA SEPTIC DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7584198 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Cobra Septic 21222000264",
+    amount: "-8,300.00",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "ach_debit");
+  assert.equal(c.pmtId, "7584198");
+  assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000264");
+  assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Cobra Septic");
+});
+
+test("classifier: embedded payment number with internal space '21 222000273'", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "HALL PUMP SALES DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7617407 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Hall Pump Sales & Service Corporation 21 222000273",
+    amount: "-5,495.00",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000273");
+  assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Hall Pump Sales & Service Corporation");
+});
+
+test("classifier: embedded payment number with internal space '2122200 0256'", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "STERLING SEPTIC DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7603631 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Sterling Septic & Plumbing, LLC. 2122200 0256",
+    amount: "-1,407.59",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000256");
+  assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Sterling Septic & Plumbing, LLC.");
+});
+
+test("classifier: ACH reversal credit reusing PMT id is ach_return", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "SEA HAVEN INDUST DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 7176466 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Sea Haven Industries, Inc 21222000128",
+    amount: "2,100.00",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "ach_return");
+  assert.equal(c.pmtId, "7176466");
+  assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, "21222000128");
+});
+
+test("classifier: short trailing digits are not an embedded payment number", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "SOME VENDOR DES:PAYMENTS ID:PMT 700001 INDN:Sea Haven Industries, CO ID:1811679038 CCD PMT INFO:Vendor Company 2000",
+    amount: "-100.00",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.embeddedPaymentNumber, null);
+  assert.equal(c.vendorText, "Vendor Company 2000");
+});
+
+test("classifier: unknown code on a check-shaped transaction is 'unknown', never dropped", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    transactionCode: "699",
+    customerReference: "3301",
+    text: "SOMETHING NEW",
+    amount: "-100.00",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "unknown");
+  assert.equal(c.checkShaped, true);
+  assert.equal(c.code, "699");
+});
+
+test("classifier: transfers and misc bank activity are ignored", () => {
+  const c = classifyTransaction({
+    text: "ACCOUNT TRANSFER TRSF FROM 483096772516",
+    amount: "15,000.00",
+  });
+  assert.equal(c.event, "ignored");
+  // Not check-shaped (no code, no reference, no CHECK text) -> ignored too.
+  const c2 = classifyTransaction({ text: "RETURN ITEM CHARGEBACK", amount: "-215" });
+  assert.equal(c2.event, "ignored");
+});
+
+test("amountsEqual: comma-tolerant, sign-insensitive, zero never matches", () => {
+  assert.equal(amountsEqual("1,892.62", -1892.62), true);
+  assert.equal(amountsEqual(0, 0), false);
+  assert.equal(amountsEqual("", ""), false);
+});
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------- matcher
+
+const payment = (over = {}) => ({
+  pk: `payment#${over.check_number ?? "1001"}`,
+  check_number: "1001",
+  method: "Check",
+  amount_usd: 500,
+  status: "Outstanding",
+  send_payment_on: "07/01/2026",
+  ...over,
+});
+
+test("matcher: check number AND amount must both match", () => {
+  const payments = [payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 500 })];
+  const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "1001", amount: 500 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment, payments[0]);
+  assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "number+amount");
+});
+
+test("matcher: number match with wrong amount falls back to unique exact-amount match", () => {
+  const payments = [
+    payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 500 }),
+    payment({ check_number: "1002", amount_usd: 750.25, pk: "payment#1002" }),
+  ];
+  // Posting collapsed onto 1001's number but carries 1002's amount.
+  const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "1001", amount: 750.25 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "1002");
+  assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "amount");
+});
+
+test("matcher: collapsed number we never issued still recovers by amount", () => {
+  const payments = [payment({ check_number: "11222000123", amount_usd: 6413 })];
+  const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "1222000012", amount: 6413 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "11222000123");
+  assert.equal(m.matchedBy, "amount");
+});
+
+test("matcher: ambiguous amount fallback is unmatched — no write", () => {
+  const payments = [
+    payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 500 }),
+    payment({ check_number: "1002", amount_usd: 350, pk: "payment#1002" }),
+    payment({ check_number: "1003", amount_usd: 350, pk: "payment#1003" }),
+  ];
+  const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "1001", amount: 350 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
+  assert.match(m.unmatched, /ambiguous/);
+});
+
+test("matcher: zero candidates is unmatched", () => {
+  const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "9999", amount: 123.45 }, [payment()], "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
+});
+
+test("matcher: amount fallback only considers checks issued in the last 120 days", () => {
+  const payments = [
+    payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 350, send_payment_on: "01/02/2026" }),
+  ];
+  const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "2001", amount: 350 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
+});
+
+test("matcher: non-Check payments are never check-match candidates", () => {
+  const payments = [payment({ method: "ACH", check_number: "21222000264", amount_usd: 350 })];
+  const m = matchCheckTransaction({ checkNumber: "21222000264", amount: 350 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
+});
+
+test("electronic return: unique amount among bank-confirmed payments matches", () => {
+  const payments = [
+    payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 3992.15, clear_status: "Cleared" }),
+    payment({ check_number: "1002", amount_usd: 3992.15, pk: "payment#1002" }), // not bank-confirmed
+  ];
+  const m = matchElectronicReturn({ amount: 3992.15 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment.check_number, "1001");
+});
+
+test("electronic return: ambiguity is unmatched", () => {
+  const payments = [
+    payment({ check_number: "1001", amount_usd: 2500, clear_status: "Cleared" }),
+    payment({ check_number: "1002", amount_usd: 2500, clear_status: "Cleared", pk: "payment#1002" }),
+  ];
+  const m = matchElectronicReturn({ amount: 2500 }, payments, "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(m.payment, undefined);
+  assert.match(m.unmatched, /ambiguous/);
+});
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------------ transitions
+
+const paidEvent = (over = {}) => ({
+  event: "check_paid",
+  amount: 500,
+  bankReference: "813300001",
+  ...over,
+});
+const returnEvent = (over = {}) => ({
+  event: "check_return",
+  amount: 500,
+  bankReference: "813300002",
+  ...over,
+});
+
+test("transitions: paid debit sets BOTH status and clear_status to Cleared with dates", () => {
+  const p = payment();
+  const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent(), "2026-07-19");
+  assert.equal(r.kind, "cleared");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Cleared");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Cleared");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.paid_date, "2026-07-19");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.cleared_date, "2026-07-19");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.bank_reference, "813300001");
+  assert.deepEqual(r.historyEvent, {
+    event: "check_paid",
+    date: "2026-07-19",
+    bankRef: "813300001",
+    amount: 500,
+  });
+});
+
+test("transitions: return applies EVEN IF currently Cleared; clear_status is bank truth", () => {
+  const p = payment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Cleared" });
+  const r = applyEvent(p, returnEvent(), "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(r.kind, "returned");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Returned");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.returned_date, "2026-07-20");
+  // status has no "Returned" rung on the CSV ladder — re-written unchanged.
+  assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Cleared");
+});
+
+test("transitions: second paid debit on a Returned check is a redeposit back to Cleared", () => {
+  const p = payment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Returned" });
+  const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent({ bankReference: "813300003" }), "2026-07-21");
+  assert.equal(r.kind, "redeposit");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Cleared");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Cleared");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.paid_date, "2026-07-21");
+});
+
+test("transitions: paid -> returned -> redeposit sequence accumulates history", () => {
+  const p = payment();
+  p.history = p.history || [];
+  const seq = [
+    [paidEvent(), "2026-07-18"],
+    [returnEvent(), "2026-07-19"],
+    [paidEvent({ bankReference: "813300004" }), "2026-07-20"],
+  ];
+  const kinds = [];
+  for (const [ev, date] of seq) {
+    const r = applyEvent(p, ev, date);
+    kinds.push(r.kind);
+    Object.assign(p, r.updates);
+    p.history.push(r.historyEvent);
+  }
+  assert.deepEqual(kinds, ["cleared", "returned", "redeposit"]);
+  assert.equal(p.clear_status, "Cleared");
+  assert.equal(p.history.length, 3);
+  assert.deepEqual(
+    p.history.map((h) => h.event),
+    ["check_paid", "check_return", "check_paid"]
+  );
+});
+
+test("transitions: return on a canceled record is terminal voided-and-bounced", () => {
+  const p = payment({ status: "Voided", clear_status: "Cleared" });
+  const r = applyEvent(p, returnEvent(), "2026-07-20");
+  assert.equal(r.kind, "voided_and_bounced");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Returned");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Voided"); // cancel status stays visible
+});
+
+test("transitions: paid debit on a canceled record keeps the cancel status", () => {
+  const p = payment({ status: "Marked as Void" });
+  const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent(), "2026-07-19");
+  assert.equal(r.kind, "cleared_on_canceled");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.status, "Marked as Void");
+  assert.equal(r.updates.clear_status, "Cleared");
+});
+
+test("transitions: identical replayed event is a noop (idempotent replays)", () => {
+  const p = payment({
+    status: "Cleared",
+    clear_status: "Cleared",
+    history: [{ event: "check_paid", date: "2026-07-19", bankRef: "813300001", amount: 500 }],
+  });
+  const r = applyEvent(p, paidEvent(), "2026-07-19");
+  assert.equal(r.kind, "noop");
+  assert.equal(r.updates, null);
+});
+
+test("transitions: every non-noop result sets both status and clear_status", () => {
+  const cases = [
+    [payment(), paidEvent()],
+    [payment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Cleared" }), returnEvent()],
+    [payment({ status: "Cleared", clear_status: "Returned" }), paidEvent()],
+    [payment({ status: "Voided" }), returnEvent()],
+    [payment({ clear_status: "Cleared" }), { event: "electronic_return", amount: 500, bankReference: "x" }],
+  ];
+  for (const [p, ev] of cases) {
+    const r = applyEvent(p, ev, "2026-07-20");
+    assert.notEqual(r.kind, "noop");
+    assert.ok("status" in r.updates, `${r.kind} must set status`);
+    assert.ok("clear_status" in r.updates, `${r.kind} must set clear_status`);
+  }
+});
+
+test("isCancelStatus covers the Stampli cancel vocabulary", () => {
+  for (const s of ["Voided", "cancelled", "Canceled", "Marked as Void"]) {
+    assert.equal(isCancelStatus(s), true);
+  }
+  assert.equal(isCancelStatus("Cleared"), false);
+});
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------------- date range
+
+test("resolveDateRange: default is yesterday", () => {
+  const r = resolveDateRange({}, new Date("2026-07-21T13:00:00Z"));
+  assert.deepEqual(r, { fromDate: "2026-07-20", toDate: "2026-07-20" });
+});
+
+test("resolveDateRange: explicit valid range passes through", () => {
+  const r = resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-06-16", toDate: "2026-06-23" });
+  assert.deepEqual(r, { fromDate: "2026-06-16", toDate: "2026-06-23" });
+});
+
+test("resolveDateRange: fromDate only replays a single day", () => {
+  const r = resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-06-08" });
+  assert.deepEqual(r, { fromDate: "2026-06-08", toDate: "2026-06-08" });
+});
+
+test("resolveDateRange: malformed and impossible dates throw", () => {
+  assert.throws(() => resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "06/08/2026" }));
+  assert.throws(() => resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-02-30" }));
+  assert.throws(() => resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-07-02", toDate: "2026-07-01" }));
+  assert.throws(() => resolveDateRange({ fromDate: "2026-07-01; DROP", toDate: "2026-07-02" }));
+});
+
+test("isValidISODate rejects non-strings and bad calendar dates", () => {
+  assert.equal(isValidISODate("2026-07-20"), true);
+  assert.equal(isValidISODate("2026-13-01"), false);
+  assert.equal(isValidISODate(20260720), false);
+});