Adam Moussa
f4de957915
Turn a human's Slack interaction at the plan gate into a structured decision the
graph can route, with the kind-aware mapping that closes a silent-FAIL hazard.
- KIND-AWARE NORMALIZATION (load-bearing): map_plan_decision() in slack_adapter
maps a reply to {"decision","notes"} — approve ∈ {approve,approved,yes,ok,lgtm,
ship}; abandon ∈ {abandon,reject,cancel,stop,kill}; EVERYTHING ELSE →
request_changes with the full reply as notes (never accidental abandon). Wired
in the listener's _resolve_payload for plan_decision rows ONLY (clarify passes
through). Without this, arbitrary change-notes hit the graph's
unrecognized-verb→FAILED path and silently fail the task. Anti-FAIL tests
assert prose → request_changes (!= abandon) at both the mapper and the
end-to-end listener seam; a regression test guards clarify pass-through.
New find_open_question_kind_by_channel_ref (anti-replay, status='open') powers
the thread-reply fallback's kind lookup.
- BUTTONS + MODAL: build_plan_decision_blocks() renders Approve (primary) /
Request changes / Abandon (danger+confirm); question_id double-anchored in
message metadata AND each button value ("<verb>:<question_id>"). Approve/abandon
submit via the existing @app.action(.*); request_changes has a dedicated
handler that AUTHORIZES before views_open (proven by test) and opens a notes
modal (private_metadata carries the id) → view_submission → request_changes +
notes. Free-text reply stays the always-available equal path. AUTHZ-01 ordering
preserved.
- No manifest change (views.open needs no extra scope).
1454 passed (1412 + 42).
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| schema.py | ||
| schema.sql | ||
| transitions.py | ||