mirror of
https://github.com/Sea-Haven-Industries/open-swe.git
synced 2026-09-30 08:03:15 +00:00
218 lines
7.5 KiB
Python
218 lines
7.5 KiB
Python
"""LLM-judge evaluator for the reviewer eval.
|
|
|
|
Pairwise matches each agent-emitted candidate against each golden comment using
|
|
claude-opus-4-5 (the judge model used by the martian benchmark). Returns
|
|
precision/recall/f1 per example, plus aggregate micro/macro metrics across
|
|
the experiment via a summary evaluator.
|
|
|
|
The judge prompt is kept verbatim from
|
|
withmartian/code-review-benchmark `step3_judge_comments.py` so scores are
|
|
directly comparable to martian's published numbers.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import json
|
|
import os
|
|
import threading
|
|
from typing import Any
|
|
from uuid import UUID
|
|
|
|
from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic
|
|
from langsmith.schemas import Example, Run
|
|
|
|
JUDGE_MODEL = "claude-opus-4-5"
|
|
|
|
# Call Anthropic directly. Without an explicit base_url the Anthropic SDK falls
|
|
# back to ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, which in dev shells points at the LangSmith
|
|
# gateway and 403s for this model — silently nulling every judge score.
|
|
JUDGE_BASE_URL = os.environ.get("JUDGE_ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL", "https://api.anthropic.com")
|
|
|
|
JUDGE_SYSTEM = "You are a precise code review evaluator. Always respond with valid JSON."
|
|
|
|
JUDGE_PROMPT = """You are evaluating AI code review tools.
|
|
Determine if the candidate issue matches the golden (expected) comment.
|
|
|
|
Golden Comment (the issue we're looking for):
|
|
{golden_comment}
|
|
|
|
Candidate Issue (from the tool's review):
|
|
{candidate}
|
|
|
|
Instructions:
|
|
- Determine if the candidate identifies the SAME underlying issue as the golden comment
|
|
- Accept semantic matches - different wording is fine if it's the same problem
|
|
- Focus on whether they point to the same bug, concern, or code issue
|
|
|
|
Respond with ONLY a JSON object:
|
|
{{"reasoning": "brief explanation", "match": true/false, "confidence": 0.0-1.0}}"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
_judge: ChatAnthropic | None = None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _get_judge() -> ChatAnthropic:
|
|
global _judge
|
|
if _judge is None:
|
|
api_key = os.environ.get("JUDGE_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY") or os.environ.get("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY")
|
|
if not api_key:
|
|
raise RuntimeError(
|
|
"No Anthropic API key for the judge. Set JUDGE_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or "
|
|
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (the judge calls Anthropic directly, not via a gateway)."
|
|
)
|
|
_judge = ChatAnthropic(
|
|
model=JUDGE_MODEL,
|
|
temperature=0.0,
|
|
max_tokens=512,
|
|
base_url=JUDGE_BASE_URL,
|
|
api_key=api_key,
|
|
max_retries=3,
|
|
)
|
|
return _judge
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _format_candidate(c: dict) -> str:
|
|
parts = []
|
|
if c.get("file"):
|
|
loc = c["file"]
|
|
if c.get("line") is not None:
|
|
loc += f":{c['line']}"
|
|
parts.append(f"Location: {loc}")
|
|
if c.get("severity"):
|
|
parts.append(f"Severity: {c['severity']}")
|
|
parts.append(f"Comment: {c.get('body') or c.get('comment') or ''}")
|
|
return "\n".join(parts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _format_golden(g: dict) -> str:
|
|
parts = []
|
|
if g.get("severity"):
|
|
parts.append(f"Severity: {g['severity']}")
|
|
parts.append(f"Comment: {g.get('comment', '')}")
|
|
return "\n".join(parts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _judge_pair(golden: dict, candidate: dict) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
prompt = JUDGE_PROMPT.format(
|
|
golden_comment=_format_golden(golden),
|
|
candidate=_format_candidate(candidate),
|
|
)
|
|
msg = _get_judge().invoke(
|
|
[{"role": "system", "content": JUDGE_SYSTEM}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
|
|
)
|
|
raw = msg.content if isinstance(msg.content, str) else str(msg.content)
|
|
try:
|
|
start, end = raw.find("{"), raw.rfind("}")
|
|
return json.loads(raw[start : end + 1])
|
|
except (ValueError, json.JSONDecodeError):
|
|
return {"match": False, "confidence": 0.0, "reasoning": f"unparseable: {raw[:200]}"}
|
|
|
|
|
|
_PER_EXAMPLE_COUNTS: dict[UUID, dict[str, int | float]] = {}
|
|
_COUNTS_LOCK = threading.Lock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _record_counts(example_id: UUID, counts: dict[str, int | float]) -> None:
|
|
with _COUNTS_LOCK:
|
|
_PER_EXAMPLE_COUNTS[example_id] = counts
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _drain_counts() -> list[dict[str, int | float]]:
|
|
with _COUNTS_LOCK:
|
|
snapshot = list(_PER_EXAMPLE_COUNTS.values())
|
|
_PER_EXAMPLE_COUNTS.clear()
|
|
return snapshot
|
|
|
|
|
|
def judge_match(run: Run, example: Example) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
"""Per-example evaluator: compute precision/recall/f1/tp/fp/fn against goldens.
|
|
|
|
Stashes the raw counts on a process-local cache keyed by ``example.id`` so
|
|
``aggregate_pr`` can compute micro-averages without re-judging.
|
|
"""
|
|
candidates: list[dict] = list((run.outputs or {}).get("comments") or [])
|
|
goldens: list[dict] = list((example.outputs or {}).get("golden_comments") or [])
|
|
|
|
if not goldens:
|
|
return {"results": [{"key": "f1", "score": None, "comment": "no goldens"}]}
|
|
|
|
matched_goldens: set[int] = set()
|
|
matched_candidates: set[int] = set()
|
|
|
|
for ci, cand in enumerate(candidates):
|
|
for gi, gold in enumerate(goldens):
|
|
if gi in matched_goldens:
|
|
continue
|
|
res = _judge_pair(gold, cand)
|
|
if res.get("match"):
|
|
matched_goldens.add(gi)
|
|
matched_candidates.add(ci)
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
tp = len(matched_goldens)
|
|
fp = max(0, len(candidates) - len(matched_candidates))
|
|
fn = max(0, len(goldens) - tp)
|
|
precision = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) else 0.0
|
|
recall = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) else 0.0
|
|
f1 = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) if (precision + recall) else 0.0
|
|
|
|
_record_counts(
|
|
example.id,
|
|
{"tp": tp, "fp": fp, "fn": fn, "precision": precision, "recall": recall, "f1": f1},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
"results": [
|
|
{"key": "f1", "score": f1},
|
|
{"key": "precision", "score": precision},
|
|
{"key": "recall", "score": recall},
|
|
{"key": "tp", "score": tp},
|
|
{"key": "fp", "score": fp},
|
|
{"key": "fn", "score": fn},
|
|
{"key": "n_candidates", "score": len(candidates)},
|
|
{"key": "n_goldens", "score": len(goldens)},
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _f1(p: float, r: float) -> float:
|
|
return 2 * p * r / (p + r) if (p + r) else 0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
def aggregate_pr(runs: list[Run], examples: list[Example]) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
"""Summary evaluator: micro/macro precision-recall-F1 across the experiment.
|
|
|
|
Reads the per-example counts that ``judge_match`` stashed in the
|
|
process-local cache. Falls back to an empty result set if the cache
|
|
is empty (e.g. summary evaluator ran in a different process).
|
|
"""
|
|
counts = _drain_counts()
|
|
if not counts:
|
|
return {"results": []}
|
|
|
|
micro_tp = sum(int(c["tp"]) for c in counts)
|
|
micro_fp = sum(int(c["fp"]) for c in counts)
|
|
micro_fn = sum(int(c["fn"]) for c in counts)
|
|
|
|
micro_p = micro_tp / (micro_tp + micro_fp) if (micro_tp + micro_fp) else 0.0
|
|
micro_r = micro_tp / (micro_tp + micro_fn) if (micro_tp + micro_fn) else 0.0
|
|
micro_f1 = _f1(micro_p, micro_r)
|
|
|
|
n = len(counts)
|
|
macro_p = sum(float(c["precision"]) for c in counts) / n
|
|
macro_r = sum(float(c["recall"]) for c in counts) / n
|
|
macro_f1 = sum(float(c["f1"]) for c in counts) / n
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
"results": [
|
|
{"key": "micro_precision", "score": micro_p},
|
|
{"key": "micro_recall", "score": micro_r},
|
|
{"key": "micro_f1", "score": micro_f1},
|
|
{"key": "macro_precision", "score": macro_p},
|
|
{"key": "macro_recall", "score": macro_r},
|
|
{"key": "macro_f1", "score": macro_f1},
|
|
{"key": "total_tp", "score": micro_tp},
|
|
{"key": "total_fp", "score": micro_fp},
|
|
{"key": "total_fn", "score": micro_fn},
|
|
]
|
|
}
|