open-swe/evals/reviewer/judge.py

218 lines
7.5 KiB
Python

"""LLM-judge evaluator for the reviewer eval.
Pairwise matches each agent-emitted candidate against each golden comment using
claude-opus-4-5 (the judge model used by the martian benchmark). Returns
precision/recall/f1 per example, plus aggregate micro/macro metrics across
the experiment via a summary evaluator.
The judge prompt is kept verbatim from
withmartian/code-review-benchmark `step3_judge_comments.py` so scores are
directly comparable to martian's published numbers.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import os
import threading
from typing import Any
from uuid import UUID
from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic
from langsmith.schemas import Example, Run
JUDGE_MODEL = "claude-opus-4-5"
# Call Anthropic directly. Without an explicit base_url the Anthropic SDK falls
# back to ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, which in dev shells points at the LangSmith
# gateway and 403s for this model — silently nulling every judge score.
JUDGE_BASE_URL = os.environ.get("JUDGE_ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL", "https://api.anthropic.com")
JUDGE_SYSTEM = "You are a precise code review evaluator. Always respond with valid JSON."
JUDGE_PROMPT = """You are evaluating AI code review tools.
Determine if the candidate issue matches the golden (expected) comment.
Golden Comment (the issue we're looking for):
{golden_comment}
Candidate Issue (from the tool's review):
{candidate}
Instructions:
- Determine if the candidate identifies the SAME underlying issue as the golden comment
- Accept semantic matches - different wording is fine if it's the same problem
- Focus on whether they point to the same bug, concern, or code issue
Respond with ONLY a JSON object:
{{"reasoning": "brief explanation", "match": true/false, "confidence": 0.0-1.0}}"""
_judge: ChatAnthropic | None = None
def _get_judge() -> ChatAnthropic:
global _judge
if _judge is None:
api_key = os.environ.get("JUDGE_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY") or os.environ.get("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY")
if not api_key:
raise RuntimeError(
"No Anthropic API key for the judge. Set JUDGE_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or "
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (the judge calls Anthropic directly, not via a gateway)."
)
_judge = ChatAnthropic(
model=JUDGE_MODEL,
temperature=0.0,
max_tokens=512,
base_url=JUDGE_BASE_URL,
api_key=api_key,
max_retries=3,
)
return _judge
def _format_candidate(c: dict) -> str:
parts = []
if c.get("file"):
loc = c["file"]
if c.get("line") is not None:
loc += f":{c['line']}"
parts.append(f"Location: {loc}")
if c.get("severity"):
parts.append(f"Severity: {c['severity']}")
parts.append(f"Comment: {c.get('body') or c.get('comment') or ''}")
return "\n".join(parts)
def _format_golden(g: dict) -> str:
parts = []
if g.get("severity"):
parts.append(f"Severity: {g['severity']}")
parts.append(f"Comment: {g.get('comment', '')}")
return "\n".join(parts)
def _judge_pair(golden: dict, candidate: dict) -> dict[str, Any]:
prompt = JUDGE_PROMPT.format(
golden_comment=_format_golden(golden),
candidate=_format_candidate(candidate),
)
msg = _get_judge().invoke(
[{"role": "system", "content": JUDGE_SYSTEM}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
)
raw = msg.content if isinstance(msg.content, str) else str(msg.content)
try:
start, end = raw.find("{"), raw.rfind("}")
return json.loads(raw[start : end + 1])
except (ValueError, json.JSONDecodeError):
return {"match": False, "confidence": 0.0, "reasoning": f"unparseable: {raw[:200]}"}
_PER_EXAMPLE_COUNTS: dict[UUID, dict[str, int | float]] = {}
_COUNTS_LOCK = threading.Lock()
def _record_counts(example_id: UUID, counts: dict[str, int | float]) -> None:
with _COUNTS_LOCK:
_PER_EXAMPLE_COUNTS[example_id] = counts
def _drain_counts() -> list[dict[str, int | float]]:
with _COUNTS_LOCK:
snapshot = list(_PER_EXAMPLE_COUNTS.values())
_PER_EXAMPLE_COUNTS.clear()
return snapshot
def judge_match(run: Run, example: Example) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Per-example evaluator: compute precision/recall/f1/tp/fp/fn against goldens.
Stashes the raw counts on a process-local cache keyed by ``example.id`` so
``aggregate_pr`` can compute micro-averages without re-judging.
"""
candidates: list[dict] = list((run.outputs or {}).get("comments") or [])
goldens: list[dict] = list((example.outputs or {}).get("golden_comments") or [])
if not goldens:
return {"results": [{"key": "f1", "score": None, "comment": "no goldens"}]}
matched_goldens: set[int] = set()
matched_candidates: set[int] = set()
for ci, cand in enumerate(candidates):
for gi, gold in enumerate(goldens):
if gi in matched_goldens:
continue
res = _judge_pair(gold, cand)
if res.get("match"):
matched_goldens.add(gi)
matched_candidates.add(ci)
break
tp = len(matched_goldens)
fp = max(0, len(candidates) - len(matched_candidates))
fn = max(0, len(goldens) - tp)
precision = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) else 0.0
recall = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) else 0.0
f1 = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) if (precision + recall) else 0.0
_record_counts(
example.id,
{"tp": tp, "fp": fp, "fn": fn, "precision": precision, "recall": recall, "f1": f1},
)
return {
"results": [
{"key": "f1", "score": f1},
{"key": "precision", "score": precision},
{"key": "recall", "score": recall},
{"key": "tp", "score": tp},
{"key": "fp", "score": fp},
{"key": "fn", "score": fn},
{"key": "n_candidates", "score": len(candidates)},
{"key": "n_goldens", "score": len(goldens)},
]
}
def _f1(p: float, r: float) -> float:
return 2 * p * r / (p + r) if (p + r) else 0.0
def aggregate_pr(runs: list[Run], examples: list[Example]) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Summary evaluator: micro/macro precision-recall-F1 across the experiment.
Reads the per-example counts that ``judge_match`` stashed in the
process-local cache. Falls back to an empty result set if the cache
is empty (e.g. summary evaluator ran in a different process).
"""
counts = _drain_counts()
if not counts:
return {"results": []}
micro_tp = sum(int(c["tp"]) for c in counts)
micro_fp = sum(int(c["fp"]) for c in counts)
micro_fn = sum(int(c["fn"]) for c in counts)
micro_p = micro_tp / (micro_tp + micro_fp) if (micro_tp + micro_fp) else 0.0
micro_r = micro_tp / (micro_tp + micro_fn) if (micro_tp + micro_fn) else 0.0
micro_f1 = _f1(micro_p, micro_r)
n = len(counts)
macro_p = sum(float(c["precision"]) for c in counts) / n
macro_r = sum(float(c["recall"]) for c in counts) / n
macro_f1 = sum(float(c["f1"]) for c in counts) / n
return {
"results": [
{"key": "micro_precision", "score": micro_p},
{"key": "micro_recall", "score": micro_r},
{"key": "micro_f1", "score": micro_f1},
{"key": "macro_precision", "score": macro_p},
{"key": "macro_recall", "score": macro_r},
{"key": "macro_f1", "score": macro_f1},
{"key": "total_tp", "score": micro_tp},
{"key": "total_fp", "score": micro_fp},
{"key": "total_fn", "score": micro_fn},
]
}