mirror of
https://github.com/Sea-Haven-Industries/open-swe.git
synced 2026-09-30 15:03:16 +00:00
0f0f616cd4
Some checks failed
CI / Lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Format check (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Typecheck (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Unit tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Playwright E2E (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Docker build smoke (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Triage ledger up to date (push) Has been cancelled
CI / ui bun.lock in sync (push) Has been cancelled
* feat(reviewer): explicit-request verdicts + shell verdict guard Mention-triggered reviews that explicitly ask for a verdict now submit a real APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES through publish_review; auto-reviews stay advisory (COMMENT). Authorization is enforced in code: publish_review honors a verdict only when the dispatching webhook set verdict_requested, which only the explicit-mention path does. - request_pr_review gains instructions (forwarded verbatim into an escaped requester_instructions data block) and request_verdict - self-review guard downgrades verdicts on Open SWE-authored PRs; stale APPROVEs are best-effort dismissed when later findings land - new PullRequestVerdictGuardMiddleware blocks gh pr review --approve/-a/--request-changes/-r, gh api, and curl verdict fallbacks on both the coding-agent and reviewer graphs - shared escape helper moved to agent/utils/prompt_data.py * fix(reviewer): harden verdict path against security-review findings Adversarial security review (detector fan-out + proof-or-kill verifier) of the verdict feature surfaced several verdict-integrity gaps; resolve the confirmed ones: - head-drift (high): a mid-run push moves the resolved head, so an APPROVE could anchor to an unreviewed commit. Downgrade any verdict to a comment when the resolved head differs from the reviewed head (verdict_ignored reason head_moved); the push's own re-review submits a fresh verdict. - self-review fail-open: downgrade to comment when the PR author cannot be confirmed (author_unknown), and compare bot logins case-insensitively. - verdict_submitted now reflects GitHub's returned review state, not just the event we asked for, so a coerced APPROVE isn't reported as submitted. - an authorized verdict whose findings all anchor outside the diff now posts as a bodied review with zero inline comments instead of failing. - add finding_reply to the shared data-block escape tag superset.
32 lines
1.1 KiB
Python
32 lines
1.1 KiB
Python
"""Escaping for untrusted text embedded in XML-wrapped prompt data blocks."""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import re
|
|
|
|
# Closing tags of every XML wrapper used for untrusted data blocks across the
|
|
# reviewer prompt and webhook-built run prompts. XML tolerates whitespace
|
|
# around the tag name (e.g. `</body >`, `</ body\n>`), so a literal
|
|
# `.replace()` of the canonical spelling alone is insufficient — we match each
|
|
# end tag whitespace-tolerantly and rewrite it to an inert, human-readable
|
|
# form. A shared superset is safe: escaping a closing tag that a given block
|
|
# doesn't use only neutralizes attacker-controlled text.
|
|
DATA_BLOCK_WRAPPER_TAGS = (
|
|
"pr_review_threads",
|
|
"thread",
|
|
"comment",
|
|
"body",
|
|
"pr_overview",
|
|
"title",
|
|
"finding_reply",
|
|
"requester_instructions",
|
|
)
|
|
_CLOSING_TAG_RE = re.compile(
|
|
r"</\s*(" + "|".join(DATA_BLOCK_WRAPPER_TAGS) + r")\s*>",
|
|
re.IGNORECASE,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def escape_for_data_block(text: str) -> str:
|
|
"""Neutralize closing tags so an attacker-controlled body can't break out."""
|
|
return _CLOSING_TAG_RE.sub(lambda m: f"</{m.group(1).lower()}_>", text)
|