mirror of
https://github.com/Sea-Haven-Industries/open-swe.git
synced 2026-09-30 16:13:15 +00:00
|
Some checks failed
CI / Lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Format check (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Typecheck (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Unit tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Playwright E2E (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Docker build smoke (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Triage ledger up to date (push) Has been cancelled
CI / ui bun.lock in sync (push) Has been cancelled
* feat(reviewer): explicit-request verdicts + shell verdict guard Mention-triggered reviews that explicitly ask for a verdict now submit a real APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES through publish_review; auto-reviews stay advisory (COMMENT). Authorization is enforced in code: publish_review honors a verdict only when the dispatching webhook set verdict_requested, which only the explicit-mention path does. - request_pr_review gains instructions (forwarded verbatim into an escaped requester_instructions data block) and request_verdict - self-review guard downgrades verdicts on Open SWE-authored PRs; stale APPROVEs are best-effort dismissed when later findings land - new PullRequestVerdictGuardMiddleware blocks gh pr review --approve/-a/--request-changes/-r, gh api, and curl verdict fallbacks on both the coding-agent and reviewer graphs - shared escape helper moved to agent/utils/prompt_data.py * fix(reviewer): harden verdict path against security-review findings Adversarial security review (detector fan-out + proof-or-kill verifier) of the verdict feature surfaced several verdict-integrity gaps; resolve the confirmed ones: - head-drift (high): a mid-run push moves the resolved head, so an APPROVE could anchor to an unreviewed commit. Downgrade any verdict to a comment when the resolved head differs from the reviewed head (verdict_ignored reason head_moved); the push's own re-review submits a fresh verdict. - self-review fail-open: downgrade to comment when the PR author cannot be confirmed (author_unknown), and compare bot logins case-insensitively. - verdict_submitted now reflects GitHub's returned review state, not just the event we asked for, so a coerced APPROVE isn't reported as submitted. - an authorized verdict whose findings all anchor outside the diff now posts as a bodied review with zero inline comments instead of failing. - add finding_reply to the shared data-block escape tag superset. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| check_message_queue.py | ||
| ensure_no_empty_msg.py | ||
| exclude_tools.py | ||
| model_fallback.py | ||
| notify_step_limit.py | ||
| plan_mode.py | ||
| pr_creation_guard.py | ||
| pr_verdict_guard.py | ||
| refresh_github_proxy.py | ||
| refresh_slack_status.py | ||
| repair_orphaned_tool_calls.py | ||
| sandbox_circuit_breaker.py | ||
| sanitize_fireworks_messages.py | ||
| sanitize_openai_responses.py | ||
| sanitize_thinking_blocks.py | ||
| sanitize_tool_inputs.py | ||
| settle_review_check.py | ||
| subdir_agents.py | ||
| task_retry.py | ||
| timeout_wrapup.py | ||
| tool_artifact.py | ||
| tool_error_handler.py | ||
| workflow_push_guard.py | ||