mirror of
https://github.com/Sea-Haven-Industries/open-swe.git
synced 2026-09-30 12:43:16 +00:00
14 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Adam Moussa
|
032d3889e4
|
fix: align reviewer eval with published findings (upstream #1713) (#201)
* fix: align reviewer eval with published findings (#1713) * fix: make reviewer eval reflect published findings Serialize and deduplicate finding persistence, align review calibration around the final six-finding publication, and make judge matching order-independent and auditable. * fix: honor reviewer eval limits Forward configured caps into publication snapshots and keep recall-at-cap bounded for diagnostic all-findings runs. (cherry picked from commit 71e3b8183882bcc42e318f3f220c291617ebcb67) Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev> * Empty commit to trigger CI --------- Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev> |
||
|
Adam Moussa
|
1f060f2a1d
|
chore: sync upstream/main, defer #1621 modular webhooks (#81)
* chore: bake sfw binary into sandbox image (#1611) sfw only ships a launcher that fetches its real binary at first run and does a daily update check against api.github.com/repos/SocketDev/sfw-free. Both fail in the sandbox (restricted egress; the proxy injects the GitHub App installation token, which lacks access to that repo), so `sfw yarn install` errors with "could not fetch its binary". Pin sfw 2.0.6, warm + verify the binary cache at build, and set SFW_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1 so runs use the baked binary offline. * feat: editable plan mode + fix review-plan banner overlap (#1610) * feat: editable plan mode + fix review-plan banner overlap Lets the thread owner edit the plan markdown by hand from the plan-review page (Edit -> textarea -> Save) via a new PUT /dashboard/api/plan/{id} endpoint that re-publishes the plan and mirrors it into the sandbox plan.md, so approve hands the edited plan to the agent as the source of truth. Also fixes the collapsed git-panel's floating expand button covering the "Review plan ->" banner by reserving space for it. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: abort plan approval when the published plan read fails get_plan_content() swallowed store errors and returned None, so a transient failure during approve would still mark the plan approved and dispatch the generic fallback text — silently dropping an owner's edited plan. Read the plan strictly (raise_on_error=True) so approval aborts instead, matching the comment read. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: show message timestamps (#1609) * feat: show message timestamps Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: suppress fallback message timestamps Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: stable message + tool-call hover timestamps Stamp a stable client-side arrival time per message and tool call (keyed by id, persisted to localStorage). Messages render the timestamp inline; tool rows reveal a dim timestamp chip on hover. Real backend created_at still takes precedence when present. * fix: hide client-stamped message timestamps Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: add PR trace resolution (#1612) * feat: add PR trace resolution Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: inject reviewer trace context as JSON Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: address review on PR trace resolution Use the documented LangSmith metadata filter syntax (and(eq(metadata_key,...), eq(metadata_value,...))) instead of has(metadata, '{...}'), which does not match runs — _list_thread_runs was silently returning nothing. Bound full-text searches to a 90-day window so they don't hit LangSmith's large-window rate limit. Also folds in the best-effort branch->head-sha resolver (dropping the weighted scoring/threshold + repo/file evidence + GitHub hydration), sandbox JSON injection, and the admin "Resolve trace" dry-run endpoint. The IDOR findings are moot: resolve_pr_to_threads/summarize_agent_session were removed; resolution now runs deterministically from the trusted run config with no model-controlled pr_url or thread_id. * fix: scope branch trace search to the repo Branch names like fix-tests aren't unique across repos (or older PRs) in a shared tracing project, so an unscoped branch hit could resolve to an unrelated thread and write its runs into the reviewer sandbox. Require the repo slug to co-occur with the branch in matched runs; the full head SHA stays unscoped since it is globally unique. Addresses open-swe review on PR #1612. --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: include plan links in PR descriptions (#1613) Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: gate workflow pushes with approval (#1614) * feat: gate workflow pushes with approval Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: preserve proxy refresh test compatibility Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: bind workflow approvals to pushed ref Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: recover thread work as patch (#1615) * feat: recover thread work as patch Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: search sandbox cwd for recovery patches Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: omit plan link in PR description when no plan exists (#1618) Plan links in PR descriptions were always built from the thread id, so runs that never produced a plan linked to an empty plan-review page. Now the plan content store is consulted first; the link is only added when a plan with non-empty markdown actually exists. A transient store failure degrades gracefully (no link) rather than blocking PR creation. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: add filter & grouping menu to agents threads sidebar (#1617) Add a Cursor-style control to the agents sidebar that groups (None/Date/ Status/Project), filters (ownership, status, source, pull request, model, repo, include-resolved), and compacts the threads list. All client-side over already-fetched sidebar threads; preferences persist in localStorage. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: update langsmith sdk to 0.9.3 (#1616) Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: clickable shared PR header in git panel and reviews (#1620) * feat: clickable shared PR header in git panel and reviews Replace the standalone "View PR" button in the agent git panel with a clickable PR title, matching the reviews view. Extract a shared PrHeader component reused by both the git panel and the review main body. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * refactor: drop PrHeader wrapper, use shared component directly The review-side PrHeader was just a thin adapter mapping detail -> the shared component's props. Inline it at the call site and use the shared PrHeader directly so there's a single component. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * refactor: durable interrupt dispatch + completion webhook (#1621) * wip(rebuild): core reliability spine - remove PR-babysitting (ci_autofix + ci_monitor graph + webhook wiring) - dispatch core: agent/dispatch.py with multitask_strategy=interrupt + durability=sync + completion webhook; reroute all webhook + plan triggers; drop the racy in-process lock + is_thread_active busy-check - completion webhook: agent/completion.py + /webhooks/run-complete loopback route for failure/timeout replies (idempotent) Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] * feat(rebuild): async tools, reconcile, shared http timeouts, assembly tuning Parallel batch on top of the reliability spine: - async-ify all 24 tools (drop asyncio.run; requests->httpx); re-implement the http_request/fetch_url SSRF + DNS-rebinding defense httpx-natively and harden the IP check to 'not is_global' (+ IPv4-mapped unwrap) - reconcile.py: stale pending-run sweep (threads.search -> per-thread runs.list -> cancel_many), wired into the scheduler graph via task='reconcile' - shared DEFAULT_HTTP_TIMEOUT (agent/utils/http.py) on every bare httpx.AsyncClient() across utils/dashboard/webapp/middleware - run budget: MODEL_CALL_RECURSION_LIMIT 5000->250 - fix stale OpenAI->Anthropic fallback id (claude-opus-4-5 -> 4-8) - drop redundant custom repair middleware (deepagents auto-adds PatchToolCalls) - confirm tool-result eviction + summarization auto-wired via backend - slim system prompt ~8% (full harness-profile rewrite deferred) Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] * feat(rebuild): harness-profile prompt + split webhooks out of webapp - prompt.py: own the system prompt via a registered harness profile (OPEN_SWE_SHARED_BASE, kept neutral so the read-only reviewer/analyzer that share it stay safe), registered across all 4 providers; per-thread values stay in construct_system_prompt. Assembled main-agent prompt ~6.8k -> ~3.1k tokens (~55% smaller); de-duped PR/commit/suite/force-push guidance; dropped ALL-CAPS markers. - webapp.py 3325 -> 1890 LOC: moved 14 per-source handlers into agent/webhooks/{linear,slack,github}.py; webapp re-exports them for the routes + tests; moved handlers reach shared helpers via the webapp namespace to preserve the test suite's monkeypatch targets. Full suite: 1168 passing, lint clean. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] * Restore MODEL_CALL_RECURSION_LIMIT to 5000 for long-running tasks Reverts the 250 cap from the run-budget change — long-running tasks legitimately need many model calls. The notify_step_limit_reached safety net still fires if a run does hit the cap, so runs end with a signal either way. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] * fix: address PR review (auth, SSRF, interrupted status, redirect headers) - completion.py: drop `interrupted` from failure statuses — with multitask_strategy=interrupt a follow-up ends the prior run as interrupted, which is healthy, not a failure to report. [open-swe] - /webhooks/run-complete: shared-secret auth — dispatch appends ?token= when RUN_COMPLETE_WEBHOOK_SECRET is set; route verifies via hmac.compare_digest. [corridor-security] - SSRF: extract the URL validator to agent/utils/url_safety.py and apply it before server-side image fetches in multimodal.fetch_image_block. [corridor-security] - http_request: preserve caller headers/extensions across redirect hops instead of dropping them on the first hop. [open-swe] Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] * chore: remove REBUILD_PLAN.md (planning doc, not needed in the repo) Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] * fix: fail closed on run-complete webhook auth when secret unset Corridor follow-up: verify_run_complete_token returns False (not True) when RUN_COMPLETE_WEBHOOK_SECRET is unset, so the public route is never unauthenticated. Logs a startup warning when the secret is absent, and dispatch skips registering the webhook when there's no secret (no rejected callbacks). Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: restore forced tool call to prevent premature run stops (#1622) Restore the ensure_no_empty_msg middleware and the always-call-a-tool system-prompt instruction that #1535 removed. When the model emits a message with no tool call (and hasn't already messaged the user or confirmed completion), the middleware re-injects a no_op / confirming_completion tool call so the run continues instead of ending mid-task. Shipping to test whether it fixes runs that stop halfway through. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore(deps): bump langgraph-checkpoint from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1 (#1619) Bumps [langgraph-checkpoint](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph) from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/releases) - [Commits](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/compare/checkpoint==4.1.0...checkpoint==4.1.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: langgraph-checkpoint dependency-version: 4.1.1 dependency-type: indirect ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: post reviewer resolution notes verbatim (#1624) * fix: post reviewer resolution notes verbatim Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: stabilize dashboard follow-up e2e Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: preserve dashboard attribution in e2e Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: make e2e attribution marker durable Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: only echo found e2e attribution Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: check live dashboard attribution in e2e Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * hotfix: stop prompting agent/reviewer to wrap installs in sfw (#1625) Installs hung when prefixed with sfw inside the sandbox (trace 019f0608 stalled on a pending `sfw npm install` execute, never returned). Strip the Socket Firewall guidance from the agent and reviewer prompts so installs run through the project's package manager directly. sfw stays in the Docker image; nothing invokes it now. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: make plan view mobile friendly (#1636) Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: fall back to vision model for image threads (#1626) Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: surface Slack thread errors (#1627) * fix: surface Slack thread errors Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: don't set failure_reply_posted on Slack preprocessing errors The preprocessing error handler was setting failure_reply_posted=True, the same idempotency flag handle_run_completion checks to suppress duplicate run-failure replies. Since preprocessing failures happen before any run exists but the flag persists on the thread, a subsequent run failure on the same thread would be silently ignored. The preprocessing handler already posts its own Slack reply, so the run-completion idempotency flag should not be set here. --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: avoid recapping Slack replies (#1629) * chore: avoid recapping Slack replies Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: simplify Slack reply prompt wording Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: update Slack trace reply on web handoff (#1630) * fix: update Slack trace reply on web handoff Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: trigger web handoff on dashboard starts Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: format web handoff as contextual fragment Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: preserve trace_message_ts when overwriting Slack run mapping When store_slack_run_mapping is called without trace_message_ts (e.g. on follow-up Slack mentions), it was unconditionally overwriting the thread-level mapping and clobbering the timestamp captured from the initial trace reply. After that, _notify_slack_web_handoff could not find the original message, so a subsequent move to Web silently skipped the Slack trace update. Now, when trace_message_ts is not passed, the existing thread mapping is read first and its trace_message_ts is preserved. * style: ruff format --------- Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <51395795+johannes117@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev> * fix: pre-bundle shiki/@pierre deps to stop dev dynamic-import failures (#1643) * fix(ui): pre-bundle shiki/@pierre deps to stop dev dynamic-import failures shiki lazy-imports a grammar per language and these libs only live inside lazy route components, so Vite's startup scanner never sees them. They get discovered on first thread navigation, triggering a dep re-optimize + force-reload that aborts the in-flight route-chunk import, surfacing as "Failed to fetch dynamically imported module: .../$threadId.tsx". Pre-bundle them (and the github themes + common code-block languages) via optimizeDeps.include so the optimize happens once at startup. Dev-only; production bundles are unaffected. * fix: pre-bundle canonical shiki docker/make langs instead of aliases --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: show queued dashboard follow-ups (#1631) * feat: show queued dashboard follow-ups Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: de-dupe queued follow-ups while streaming --------- Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev> * feat: notify Slack on plan approval (#1632) * feat: notify Slack on plan approval Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: post Slack approval notice after successful dispatch Move the _maybe_post_plan_approved_to_slack call until after _dispatch_followup succeeds so the Slack thread is not told implementation is beginning before the LangGraph run is created. Addresses PR review comment. --------- Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev> * feat: include Slack channel context in prompts (#1633) Add cached Slack channel metadata enrichment for Slack-triggered runs so prompts can include channel names and descriptions without duplicate conversations.info calls.\n\nCo-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: keep plan guidance high-level (#1634) Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: publish plans from sandbox files (#1635) * feat: publish plans from sandbox files Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: avoid fixed plan filenames Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: virtualize local sandbox file paths Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: preserve plan_file_path across set_plan_status set_plan_status was rewriting the content record with only markdown and status, dropping plan_file_path. After a reject, the owner's dashboard edit would mirror to a different file than the agent's original, and the next save_plan could republish the stale file. Preserve plan_file_path when updating status. --------- Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: return to thread after plan approval (#1637) Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: add Slack breakout thread tool (#1638) * feat: add Slack breakout thread tool Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: make fake LLM scripts declarative Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: exclude slack_start_new_thread from plan mode The breakout tool can dispatch a fresh agent run that starts outside the current plan-mode state, bypassing the approval flow. Add it to PLAN_MODE_EXCLUDED_TOOLS so it's hidden alongside the other mutating tools while planning. --------- Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: require bun for ui agent work (#1639) Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: request actions read for sandbox logs (#1642) * fix: request actions read for sandbox logs Request optional Actions read permission for sandbox proxy tokens, with fallback for installations that have not approved it yet. Update setup docs and prompt guidance for safe GitHub Actions log usage. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: restore actions:read scope after workflow push After an approved workflow push, the guard was restoring the proxy with BASE_RUNTIME_PROXY_TOKEN_PERMISSIONS, which excludes the actions: read scope this PR adds. Restore with RUNTIME_PROXY_TOKEN_PERMISSIONS (which includes actions: read) and fall back to BASE if the install hasn't granted Actions read — mirroring the pattern in _create_sandbox_with_proxy. Addresses review comment on PR #1642. --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: widen split review diffs (#1647) Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: install missing deps before verification (#1646) Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: switch ui to pnpm (#1645) * chore: require pnpm for ui agent work Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: switch ui to pnpm Replace Bun and Yarn lockfiles with pnpm lockfile and update UI/Vercel commands to use pnpm. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * ci: use corepack for ui pnpm e2e build Run pnpm through Corepack in the E2E global setup so CI can use the pinned package manager without a separate pnpm install step. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: add Sonnet 5 to model picker (#1651) * chore: update Sonnet examples to Sonnet 5 Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: add Sonnet 5 to model picker Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * Remove dead breakout-thread e2e scenario after dropping the tool The merge resolution deferred upstream's Slack breakout-thread tool (slack_start_new_thread, #1638) since it depends on the #1621 dispatch module, but the e2e harness still scripted it. Removing the tool name from fake_llm.py's _tool_step call left a malformed scenario, crashing the langgraph-dev web server at import (TypeError: _tool_step() missing 'call_id') and failing Playwright E2E. Drop the "breakout" script scenario, its _is_breakout_request helper + ScriptRule, and the corresponding full_flow.spec.ts test. * Revert upstream pnpm switch; keep bun for the UI build The merge auto-adopted upstream's pnpm switch (#1645) in tests/e2e/ global-setup.ts and ui/package.json, but our fork builds the UI with bun (vercel.json + the E2E workflow's setup-bun). That left the Playwright globalSetup running `corepack pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` with no pnpm-lock.yaml, failing E2E at UI build time. Revert global-setup.ts and ui/package.json to the dev (bun) baseline, drop the merge-added ui/pnpm-lock.yaml, and remove the re-added ui/AGENTS.md (our fork had deleted it). * Align plan-review e2e + UI with the HEAD (pre-#1635) backend The merge left a split plan vertical: the backend save_plan/plan_api are HEAD (we deferred the editable-plan/sandbox-publish features #1610/#1635/ #1637 per #80), but the plan UI and e2e harness were upstream's. The fake_llm scenario called save_plan(plan_file_path=...) — upstream's file-based #1635 contract — while HEAD save_plan takes plan_markdown, so the plan never saved and PlanReview never rendered (E2E failure on the plan-review locator). Pass plan_markdown to save_plan, and revert PlanReview.tsx / plan.ts / $threadId_.plan.tsx / plan_review.spec.ts to the dev baseline so the whole plan flow (save -> render -> approve -> implement) is consistent with the HEAD backend. --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev> Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <ramon.nogueira@langchain.dev> Co-authored-by: Ramon Nogueira <270434257+ramon-langchain@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Caroline di Vittorio <43390382+carolinedivittorio@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <51395795+johannes117@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ankush Gola <9536492+agola11@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Mukil Loganathan <mukil@langchain.dev> |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
258b5b4034
|
feat: disable out-of-diff reviewer findings (#1516)
* feat: disable out-of-diff reviewer findings PR reviews were surfacing findings about code outside the PR's changed lines, which read as random/off-topic noise. Reject out-of-diff findings at add_finding and stop surfacing them in publish_review so only findings anchored to changed lines reach the PR. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: align reviewer bar with out-of-diff rejection The filing bar still permitted proven regressions in files absent from the diff, but add_finding now rejects those, so a concrete regression could be silently dropped after a failed tool call. Update the bar and the "Do NOT file" list so the prompt only directs in-diff findings. Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
8461979b0d
|
fix: honest publish_review reporting + structured thread-not-found errors (#1481)
* fix: honest publish_review reporting + structured thread-not-found errors
- Document skipped_empty_re_review and dry_run in the publish_review
docstring and add a closing-summary contract to the reviewer prompt so
the agent never claims a review was published when review_id is null.
- Raise ReviewerThreadMissingError from replace_findings on SDK
NotFoundError; add_finding/update_finding/publish_review return a
structured do-not-retry result instead of raising, so the agent reports
the blocker after one failure instead of retrying 10-30 times.
* fix: translate thread 404s across all reviewer tool boundaries
get_thread_metadata now raises ReviewerThreadMissingError instead of
swallowing a missing thread as {} (which produced misleading 'No finding
found' results), set_reviewer_thread_metadata translates the SDK 404 the
same way, and every reviewer tool entrypoint (add/update/list findings,
publish_review incl. eval dry-run, resolve/reply thread) returns the
structured do-not-retry result.
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
f64ab2bcd7
|
feat: surface out-of-diff findings in a collapsed dropdown (#1427)
* fix: stop reviewer retrying out-of-diff findings add_finding rejects findings anchored outside the PR diff, but the agent retried the same finding 2-3x with adjacent line ranges before giving up, burning a model turn each. Add a reviewer-prompt recovery block telling the agent the rejection is authoritative (drop or re-anchor to a + line, don't retry adjacent), and enrich the rejection payload with nearby in-diff line ranges for the file so a single re-anchor needs no guessing. * feat: surface out-of-diff findings in a collapsed dropdown Instead of rejecting findings anchored outside the PR diff, accept them (marked in_diff=false) and surface them in a collapsed <details> section of the review summary, Devin-style. Inline comments stay reserved for in-diff findings; out-of-diff are severity-gated and capped the same way. Re-review normally suppresses the empty summary, but now makes an exception when there are new out-of-diff findings to surface. Surfaced out-of-diff findings carry a github_review_id so they aren't reposted on later pushes. Supersedes the earlier 'drop/re-anchor out-of-diff' prompt guidance. --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <215916821+open-swe[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
1d4f1aed33
|
fix: reviewer publishes against stale head_sha on mid-run re-review (#1393)
* fix: resolve reviewer head_sha from thread metadata, not frozen run config A push that lands while a reviewer run is in flight is delivered as a queued message into that run. The run's configurable is frozen at creation, so its head_sha still names the commit the run was created for — not the commit just pushed. publish_review then anchored the GitHub review to the stale commit and regressed last_reviewed_sha to it, and add_finding/update_finding stamped findings with the stale SHA. Persist the current head in thread metadata at every reviewer dispatch (both the ready-for-review and push paths, before they branch to create a run or queue a message), and add resolve_review_head_sha() which prefers the metadata head over the run config. Wire it into publish_review (review commit_id + last_reviewed_sha), add_finding (first_seen_sha) and update_finding (last_confirmed_sha). Falls back to the run config when metadata carries no head (first review, eval, tests). * fix: persist head_sha in manual review dispatch (trigger_pr_review_from_ref) resolve_review_head_sha prefers metadata[head_sha] over the run config, and the push/ready dispatchers write it — but trigger_pr_review_from_ref (Slack/GitHub @open-swe review, request_pr_review tool) created a run with a freshly-fetched config head while leaving metadata's head stale from a prior dispatch. A manual re-review at a newer commit would then resolve to the old head and publish/advance findings against it. Persist head_sha in that dispatch's metadata write too, so every run-creating reviewer dispatch keeps metadata in sync with the head its run targets. Caught by the Open SWE reviewer on this PR. |
||
|
open-swe[bot]
|
9998119921
|
feat: generate reviewer finding titles (#1355)
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <51395795+johannes117@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
fa147ce256
|
fix: fetch PR diff via GitHub API to re-enable add_finding validation (#1339)
* reviewer: fetch PR diff via GitHub API to re-enable add_finding validation The previous hotfix in reviewer.py set diff_line_set=None because the sandbox-based diff prep was sometimes producing empty diffs. That made every bad anchor a publish-time 422 instead of a creation-time rejection — the agent burned tokens producing unanchorable findings, and we had to add a publish-time retry safety net (#1338) to clean up. Fetch the PR's unified diff via the GitHub REST API at reviewer startup and populate diff_text + diff_line_set so add_finding can reject bad anchors immediately. The API path is reliable and is the same diff GitHub validates against when posting inline review comments. If the fetch fails, fall back to the previous behavior (validation disabled, publish-time retry handles it). Also extract the PR-diff fetch into reviewer_diff.fetch_pr_diff so both reviewer.py and publish_review.py share one implementation instead of two copies. * reviewer: make diff_line_set validation side-aware compute_diff_line_set previously returned only new-side line numbers, so re-enabling add_finding's validation would wrongly reject findings with side=LEFT (deleted-line bugs whose only anchor is an old-side line). Return {file: {"RIGHT": {new_lines}, "LEFT": {old_lines}}} instead, and have is_range_in_diff select the matching side from the finding's recorded side. add_finding and publish_review's retry filter both pass the finding's side through. |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
ce466889ff
|
fix: remove line collapsing (#1330)
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
82852f9eda
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
bdea1fb6da
|
feat(open-swe): always anchor findings to a single line (#1264)
* feat(open-swe): always anchor findings to a single line GitHub renders multi-line review comment ranges as walls of context above the comment, which buries the point. Match Devin Review's behavior and always collapse `end_line` to `start_line` so each finding is anchored to the single most relevant line. Removes the (now unused) `MAX_FINDING_RANGE_LINES` cap and `clip_finding_range` helper. * fix(open-swe): collapse end_line before diff-range check |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
089db06135
|
feat(open-swe): collapse oversized finding ranges to start line (#1263)
Anchoring a finding to a 25-line range (e.g. an entire function) makes GitHub render the whole block as context above the comment, burying the review text. Cap ranges at 10 lines and collapse to the start line when exceeded; small ranges (≤10 lines) still render as a multi-line anchor. Updated the reviewer prompt to anchor tightly rather than range-select the whole function. |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
0212a60f10
|
feat(open-swe): cap reviewer suggestions at 4 lines (#1262)
* feat(open-swe): cap reviewer suggestions at 4 lines Long suggestion blocks read as the reviewer rewriting the code rather than flagging an issue, which clutters PR comments. Steer the reviewer toward description-only findings for non-trivial fixes, and enforce the cap in `add_finding` / `update_finding` so suggestions over 4 lines are dropped (the finding itself still publishes). * fix(open-swe): don't clobber prior suggestion on over-cap update `update_finding` was setting `suggestion=None` whenever clip_suggestion dropped the input, which silently wiped any existing suggestion on the finding. Distinguish the three cases: empty string clears, valid value sets, over-cap value is rejected without touching the stored field. |
||
|
Johannes du Plessis
|
378b95266e
|
feat: implement reviewer findings, publish_review, and watch mode (#1253)
* feat: implement reviewer findings, publish_review, and watch mode
Build out the reviewer agent end-to-end against the design in
REVIEWER_DESIGN.md:
- Findings as first-class state on the reviewer thread metadata
(`agent/reviewer_findings.py`): Finding TypedDict with start_line/end_line
ranges, suggestion text for ```suggestion blocks, github_review_comment_id
for cross-run reconciliation, diff_hunk for UI rendering. Thread-level
metadata gets `kind=reviewer`, `pr`, `last_reviewed_sha`, `watch` so a
future frontend can list reviewer threads via the langgraph SDK.
- Diff utilities (`agent/reviewer_diff.py`): parse_unified_diff,
compute_diff_line_set for in-diff validation, extract_diff_hunk for
caching the hunk on a Finding, compute_diff_in_sandbox for SHA-to-SHA
diffs against the prepped repo.
- Tools: `add_finding` (validates against the diff line set so out-of-diff
ranges fail at creation, not at GitHub-publish), `update_finding`,
`list_findings`, `publish_review`. The reviewer agent's tool list is
swapped from `[]` (direct shell `gh api` calls) to these four.
- Publish path (`agent/reviewer_publish.py` + `agent/tools/publish_review.py`):
one POST /reviews call with body + inline comments + ```suggestion blocks,
per-comment IDs stored back on findings, GraphQL `resolveReviewThread`
fired for findings transitioning open->resolved on a re-review.
- Reviewer graph: deterministic clone-or-fetch + checkout in the factory
before the agent's first model call (warm- and cold-path symmetric);
computed diff and in-diff line set passed via runnable config; system
prompt rewritten for the single-evolving-findings model, severity ladder,
in-diff-only discipline, and watch-mode reconciliation flow.
- Watch mode in webapp.py: `push` event + `pull_request` closed/reopened
added to supported events. New `process_github_push_event` resolves the
open PR for the pushed branch, gates on the reviewer thread's `watch`
flag, builds a re-review configurable, and triggers a run on the same
canonical thread. `process_github_pr_close` toggles watch on
closed/reopened. `set_reviewer_thread_metadata` is called on first
review to install `kind=reviewer` + PR identity + watch=True.
- Eval harness: target.py now extracts `add_finding` calls (mapped to the
legacy {file, line, body, severity} shape the judge expects) and passes
the right configurable so the prep step has base/head SHAs.
- Tests: new unit suites for findings helpers, diff parsing, finding tools,
publish rendering + GraphQL resolve, and watch-mode webhook handlers
(push triggers re-review only when watching, idempotent on unchanged
head SHA, PR close disables watch). Updated existing reviewer-webhook
tests to mock `set_reviewer_thread_metadata`.
- REVIEWER_EVAL_PLAN.md removed per user request; folded relevant context
into REVIEWER_DESIGN.md.
* fix(reviewer): correct git diff flags, scope, dedup, and review-comments URL
Address PR #1253 review findings:
- compute_diff_in_sandbox dropped the invalid `--no-prefix=false` flag
(`option no-prefix takes no value` — every prep run was failing
silently and the agent saw an empty diff).
- compute_diff_in_sandbox grew a `merge_base` flag. First-review path
now uses three-dot `base...head` (the merge-base diff GitHub renders
on Files-changed) so we don't pick up changes that landed on the base
branch after the PR diverged. Re-review delta keeps two-dot
`last_reviewed_sha..head` since that's exactly the new commits.
- publish_review skips findings that already carry
`github_review_comment_id`. Without this, watched re-reviews
re-posted every previously surfaced finding, and only the most-recent
duplicate's id would later resolve when the issue got addressed.
- fetch_review_comments URL now includes `{pull_number}` —
`/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews/{review_id}/comments`
is the canonical endpoint; the old form 404s, so comment ids were
never stored and watch-mode resolution couldn't run.
Three new tests cover: three-dot vs two-dot wiring, no `--no-prefix`
flag in the executed command, and that publish_review does not re-post
findings whose `github_review_comment_id` is set.
* fix(reviewer): default publish cap from 15 to 4
A clean PR with one critical issue padded out by three lower-severity
findings is fine; fifteen is review spam. The agent can override per
call when a PR genuinely warrants more.
|