When a Slack user kicks off a PR review with `@open-swe review <pr-url>`,
the reviewer agent now posts a one-line summary back to the Slack thread
when it finishes — either "No issues found" or "found N potential
issue(s)" with a link to the GitHub review.
The reviewer agent has no Slack tools by design, so the summary is sent
host-side from `publish_review` after the GitHub review POST succeeds.
The Slack channel/thread_ts is persisted on reviewer thread metadata at
trigger time and read back on publish. Re-reviews triggered by push
events stay silent in Slack to avoid noise on the original thread.
The reviewer agent was writing a 1–2 sentence "top-level take" as the
review body, which produced noisy paragraph-style summaries on PRs
("Reviewed the PR. The new ALLOWED_GITHUB_REPOS allowlist…"). Devin's
review comment is just a one-liner (`✅ No Issues Found` or
`**Devin Review** found N potential issue.`), and was preferred in the
internal A/B vs Graphite.
Drop the `summary` parameter from `publish_review`; render a fixed,
host-formatted body in `render_review_body` instead. Update the reviewer
prompt to forbid prose summaries.
* fix(reviewer): log every push/close early-return so 'silent ignore' is debuggable
Pushes to PRs that haven't had a first review fall through the watch
handler because the reviewer thread doesn't have kind=reviewer set.
Without log lines on the early-return paths, this scenario was
indistinguishable from 'webhook reached the handler at all' in the
hosted log stream.
Now every early-return logs at info or debug:
- info when a real PR exists but the reviewer thread isn't set up
(with a hint pointing at the trigger paths the user can use)
- info when the repo isn't in the reviewer allowlist
- debug for benign skips (non-branch refs, branch deletions,
already-reviewed head_sha)
* fix(reviewer): always post a summary review, even with no findings
The publish_review tool gated POSTing on `inline_comments or summary`,
so when the agent called publish_review() with no args on a clean PR
the result returned `success: true` but no GitHub review was posted —
the user got silence instead of a "no issues found" comment.
- Drop the gate so publish_review always POSTs.
- Friendlier no-findings render: `**No issues found.**` when the
findings list is empty, vs. `**No issues at or above \`<sev>\`
severity.**` with hidden count when only sub-threshold findings
exist. Agent summary renders below.
- Prompt now requires the agent to always pass a `summary` so the
body is meaningful; calls out specifically not to skip on a clean PR.
* feat: implement reviewer findings, publish_review, and watch mode
Build out the reviewer agent end-to-end against the design in
REVIEWER_DESIGN.md:
- Findings as first-class state on the reviewer thread metadata
(`agent/reviewer_findings.py`): Finding TypedDict with start_line/end_line
ranges, suggestion text for ```suggestion blocks, github_review_comment_id
for cross-run reconciliation, diff_hunk for UI rendering. Thread-level
metadata gets `kind=reviewer`, `pr`, `last_reviewed_sha`, `watch` so a
future frontend can list reviewer threads via the langgraph SDK.
- Diff utilities (`agent/reviewer_diff.py`): parse_unified_diff,
compute_diff_line_set for in-diff validation, extract_diff_hunk for
caching the hunk on a Finding, compute_diff_in_sandbox for SHA-to-SHA
diffs against the prepped repo.
- Tools: `add_finding` (validates against the diff line set so out-of-diff
ranges fail at creation, not at GitHub-publish), `update_finding`,
`list_findings`, `publish_review`. The reviewer agent's tool list is
swapped from `[]` (direct shell `gh api` calls) to these four.
- Publish path (`agent/reviewer_publish.py` + `agent/tools/publish_review.py`):
one POST /reviews call with body + inline comments + ```suggestion blocks,
per-comment IDs stored back on findings, GraphQL `resolveReviewThread`
fired for findings transitioning open->resolved on a re-review.
- Reviewer graph: deterministic clone-or-fetch + checkout in the factory
before the agent's first model call (warm- and cold-path symmetric);
computed diff and in-diff line set passed via runnable config; system
prompt rewritten for the single-evolving-findings model, severity ladder,
in-diff-only discipline, and watch-mode reconciliation flow.
- Watch mode in webapp.py: `push` event + `pull_request` closed/reopened
added to supported events. New `process_github_push_event` resolves the
open PR for the pushed branch, gates on the reviewer thread's `watch`
flag, builds a re-review configurable, and triggers a run on the same
canonical thread. `process_github_pr_close` toggles watch on
closed/reopened. `set_reviewer_thread_metadata` is called on first
review to install `kind=reviewer` + PR identity + watch=True.
- Eval harness: target.py now extracts `add_finding` calls (mapped to the
legacy {file, line, body, severity} shape the judge expects) and passes
the right configurable so the prep step has base/head SHAs.
- Tests: new unit suites for findings helpers, diff parsing, finding tools,
publish rendering + GraphQL resolve, and watch-mode webhook handlers
(push triggers re-review only when watching, idempotent on unchanged
head SHA, PR close disables watch). Updated existing reviewer-webhook
tests to mock `set_reviewer_thread_metadata`.
- REVIEWER_EVAL_PLAN.md removed per user request; folded relevant context
into REVIEWER_DESIGN.md.
* fix(reviewer): correct git diff flags, scope, dedup, and review-comments URL
Address PR #1253 review findings:
- compute_diff_in_sandbox dropped the invalid `--no-prefix=false` flag
(`option no-prefix takes no value` — every prep run was failing
silently and the agent saw an empty diff).
- compute_diff_in_sandbox grew a `merge_base` flag. First-review path
now uses three-dot `base...head` (the merge-base diff GitHub renders
on Files-changed) so we don't pick up changes that landed on the base
branch after the PR diverged. Re-review delta keeps two-dot
`last_reviewed_sha..head` since that's exactly the new commits.
- publish_review skips findings that already carry
`github_review_comment_id`. Without this, watched re-reviews
re-posted every previously surfaced finding, and only the most-recent
duplicate's id would later resolve when the issue got addressed.
- fetch_review_comments URL now includes `{pull_number}` —
`/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews/{review_id}/comments`
is the canonical endpoint; the old form 404s, so comment ids were
never stored and watch-mode resolution couldn't run.
Three new tests cover: three-dot vs two-dot wiring, no `--no-prefix`
flag in the executed command, and that publish_review does not re-post
findings whose `github_review_comment_id` is set.
* fix(reviewer): default publish cap from 15 to 4
A clean PR with one critical issue padded out by three lower-severity
findings is fine; fifteen is review spam. The agent can override per
call when a PR genuinely warrants more.
* feat: only post Slack 'Working on it!' on first thread mention
* feat: randomize Slack trace reply phrase
Pick from a small list of friendly phrases instead of always saying
'Working on it!' so the bot feels less robotic. Explicit messages (e.g.
'Taking a look...' from PR review path) are unaffected.
* adjust phrases
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev>
* Use gh for reviewer inline comments
* Trigger reviewer on PR review requests
* Format reviewer webhook test
* Add GitHub repo allowlist
* Separate reviewer repo allowlist
* only implement allowlist for reviewer
* feat: add reviewer graph + eval target wiring
- New `reviewer` graph (`agent/reviewer.py`) registered in langgraph.json
alongside the main `agent` graph. Reuses the same sandbox lifecycle,
GH proxy auth, and middleware primitives from `agent.server`, but with
a narrower tool set, a reviewer-specific system prompt, no
commit/push, and the `task` (subagent) tool stripped via
`_ToolExclusionMiddleware` so review stays in one context.
- New `github_comment` tool: agents call it once per issue with
`(file, line, body, severity)` and the eval scores those calls
against golden comments.
- `ensure_no_empty_msg` middleware (the no_op nudge) is intentionally
*not* on the reviewer's stack — that middleware exists to enforce the
main agent's "always finalize via Slack/Linear/PR" contract, which
the reviewer doesn't have. The main agent's behavior is unchanged.
- `evals/reviewer/target.py`: send PR info as a user message, extract
every `github_comment` tool call (multiple expected per review) into
the run output.
- `evals/reviewer/judge.py`: per-example evaluator now returns a list
of metrics under `{"results": [...]}` so LangSmith averages each
numeric key (f1/precision/recall/tp/fp/fn) across the experiment in
the UI. Dropped the broken `aggregate_pr` summary evaluator that
reached for an attribute that doesn't exist on `RunTree`.
- `evals/reviewer/run_eval.py`: `--limit` now slices the dataset via
`client.list_examples(limit=N)` since `aevaluate` doesn't accept
`max_examples`.
- Makefile: `dev` and `run` targets now use `uv run` so they work
without an activated venv.
* resolve comments
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: move github workflows to gh cli
Use LangSmith proxy auth to support gh-driven GitHub workflows while removing custom GitHub wrapper tools.
* docker ignore + snapshot and docker image updates
* updated image and instructions
* removing open_pr if needed after agent call
* feat: add edit_pull_request tool for editing PR titles and descriptions
* fix: patch auth flow in open PR middleware tests
* fix: support app token for editing PRs
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev>
* feat: add release note section to PR body template
The langchainplus repo PR template includes a ## Release Note section,
but the agent hardcoded PR body template only had ## Description and
## Test Plan. This caused the release note section to be dropped from
agent-created PRs.
* docs: align PR body argument docs
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev>
* fix: prevent futile retry loop when commit_and_open_pr fails with git/API errors
- Root cause: when git checkout or GitHub PR API fails, the tool returned a generic {"success": false} error with no signal that retrying is futile, causing the agent to loop 9-13+ times until hitting the 1000-step recursion limit
- Change: (1) git_checkout_branch now returns (bool, str) so the actual git error output is surfaced in the tool response; (2) checkout and PR creation failures now include "fatal": true and an explicit "Do not retry" message; (3) prompt.py COMMIT_PR_SECTION adds an explicit instruction to stop on fatal errors
- Verified: 109 unit tests pass, no regressions
* fix: skip PR safety net on fatal commit failures
* style(open_pr): ruff-format fatal retry skip condition
---------
Co-authored-by: LangSmith Forge <forge-agent@langsmith.ai>
Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev>
* fix: warn against using http_request for GitHub PR creation
- Root cause: http_request tool description and system prompt lacked explicit guidance not to use it for GitHub PR operations, causing the agent to fall back to it and receive 401 Unauthorized responses
- Change: added clear warnings to both the http_request docstring and the TOOL_USAGE_SECTION in prompt.py directing agents to use commit_and_open_pr instead
- Verified: docstring and prompt changes are minimal and scoped
* fix: clarify http_request PR guidance
---------
Co-authored-by: LangSmith Forge <forge-agent@langsmith.ai>
Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev>
* fix: return actionable error when git push fails due to workflows scope
- Root cause: push failure with "workflows scope" error returned a generic
"Git push failed: ..." message, causing the agent to retry 10+ times
- Change: detect "workflows" + "scope" in push output and return a clear
message instructing the agent to remove .github/workflows/ file changes
- Verified: unit tests cover both the workflow-scope path and the
non-workflow path to prevent regressions
* fix: detect github workflow permission push failures
* style: ruff-format checkout line in commit_and_open_pr
---------
Co-authored-by: LangSmith Forge <forge-agent@langsmith.ai>
Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev>
* fix: stop agent retrying commit_and_open_pr on 403 permission denied
Detect 403/permission-denied push failures in commit_and_open_pr and
return a PERMANENT_FAILURE message so the LLM stops retrying. Also add
prompt-level guidance to the COMMIT_PR_SECTION reinforcing this. Add
unit tests covering both the 403 and non-403 push failure paths.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: stop safety net retrying permanent push failures
Skip the after-agent PR fallback when commit_and_open_pr reports a permanent GitHub push authorization failure, while preserving fallback behavior for recoverable failures.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Agent <agent@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev>
* feat: add github CI check run tools for shepherding CI
Add get_pr_check_runs and rerun_failed_check_runs tools that authenticate
using the GitHub App installation token so the agent can query and retry
CI status on private repos without relying on GH_TOKEN or unauthenticated
http_request calls.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: handle paginated GitHub CI results
* refactor(github_ci): address review feedback
- Rename rerun_failed_check_runs -> rerun_failed_workflow_runs and clarify
in docstrings that the tool only retries GitHub Actions workflow runs
(not third-party CI checks surfaced by get_pr_check_runs).
- Skip action_required workflow runs when rerunning; those need manual
approval, not a rerun.
- Run rerun-failed-jobs requests concurrently via asyncio.gather instead
of sequentially.
- Fix latent pagination bug in _fetch_paginated_items where caller-supplied
params could overwrite per_page/page and break the end-of-pagination
check; reserved keys now always win and the threshold uses a PER_PAGE
constant.
- Set an explicit 30s httpx timeout so a hung GitHub call cannot stall
the agent loop.
- Restore alphabetical ordering of tools in agent/tools/__init__.py.
- Add tests for: a 500 surfaced on a later pagination page, and
action_required runs being filtered out of rerun candidates.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Agent <agent@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Johannes du Plessis <johannes@langchain.dev>
* feat: add get_pr_review_comments tool for authenticated GitHub API access
The agent was asking users to paste PR review comments because it had no
tool to fetch them with auth. This adds get_pr_review_comments, which uses
the GitHub App installation token to fetch all three comment types (thread
comments, inline review comments, review submissions) from private repos.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* u
* u
---------
Co-authored-by: Forge Agent <agent@forge.ai>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Palash Shah <palash@langchain.dev>
Co-authored-by: Palash Shah <35114859+Palashio@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: open PRs under user's name and add OpenSWE label
* feat: use user token for PR authorship, add OpenSWE label, and consolidate fallback logic
* linting
* fix: address review nits for PR authorship and labeling
Fix docstring casing, add debug logging for 422 existing-PR search
fallback, tighten test type annotations, and add missing HTTPError
fallback test.
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: use GitHub App installation token for PR creation instead of user token
* fix: move installation token fetch after no-changes check to avoid unnecessary API call
* fix: add Exa web search tool
* chore: update uv.lock for exa-py dependency
* linting
* chore: remove web_search from system prompt
* chore: drop search_type and category params from web_search
The agent sees users formatted as @Name(USER_ID) in conversation context and
reproduces that pattern in replies, but Slack requires <@USER_ID> for real
mentions. This adds automatic conversion and updates prompt instructions.
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add GitHub PR review tools (list, get, create, update, dismiss, submit, list comments) and bind them to the agent
* format n lint
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aran Yogesh <yogesh.mahendran@langchain.dev>
Adds 6 new agent tools backed by Linear's GraphQL API, with a shared
_graphql_request helper to reduce boilerplate. Refactors existing
comment_on_linear_issue to use the same helper.
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: add GitHub PR comment trigger and reply support
* refactor: improve readability of GitHub integration
* linting
* fix: resolve github token from thread metadata and improve PR trigger flow
* fix: fall back to OAuth for GitHub webhook when no token in thread metadata
* give me commit message github integeration working without a breaking
* auth.py refactor
* fix: validate cached GitHub token before use to handle expiry
* liniting
* ci unitest formatting
* feat: post PR comments as GitHub App bot instead of user OAuth token
* resolved comments
* slack resolveed comments
* Refactor docstring and comments in get_slack_repo_config
Removed unnecessary comments and cleaned up docstring formatting.
* cr
* cr
* cr
* cr
---------
Co-authored-by: bracesproul <braceasproul@gmail.com>
