open-swe/agent/utils/model.py

171 lines
5.9 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

from typing import Literal, TypedDict, Unpack
from langchain.chat_models import init_chat_model
OPENAI_RESPONSES_WS_BASE_URL = "wss://api.openai.com/v1"
# Anthropic SDK default is 2; a 529 burst can outlive that. Bump to give the
# primary provider a fair chance before the fallback middleware kicks in.
DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES = 6
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
DEFAULT_LLM_REASONING: "OpenAIReasoning" = {"effort": "medium"}
OpenAIReasoningEffort = Literal["none", "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh"]
AnthropicThinkingType = Literal["adaptive"]
AnthropicEffort = Literal["low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max"]
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
GoogleThinkingLevel = Literal["minimal", "low", "medium", "high"]
FireworksReasoningEffort = Literal["none", "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max"]
class OpenAIReasoning(TypedDict, total=False):
effort: OpenAIReasoningEffort
feat: open-swe dashboard for per-user profile config (#1302) * feat: dashboard backend — GitHub OAuth, profile CRUD, admin endpoints Adds agent/dashboard/ FastAPI router mounted at /dashboard/api covering: - GitHub App OAuth login → JWT cookie session (cross-domain ready) - profile CRUD against LangGraph Store with model+effort validation - admin gate via CONFIGURED_ADMINS - /repos via /user/installations using the user's encrypted OAuth token CORS allowlist on webapp.py is opt-in via DASHBOARD_ALLOWED_ORIGINS so the Vercel-hosted frontend can call the LangSmith deployment with credentials. * feat: apply dashboard profile model/effort overrides in get_agent Look up the triggering user's GitHub login from config (direct field or GITHUB_USER_EMAIL_MAP reverse lookup), read their profile from the Store, and apply default_model + reasoning_effort to make_model when both are valid. Effort 'max' is captured on the profile but not yet wired through — the OpenAI Reasoning Literal doesn't accept it. * feat: ui/ TanStack Start dashboard for profile config Scaffolded with the shadcn b7CScJIjA preset (TanStack Start template, base-ui primitives, Tailwind v4). Three routes: - /login — Sign in with GitHub (links to /dashboard/api/auth/login) - /profile — Edit default model, reasoning effort, default repo - /admin — Admin-only: list users and edit other profiles API client (src/lib/api.ts) uses credentials: include so the osw_session cookie set by the OAuth callback rides cross-origin. VITE_DASHBOARD_API_BASE_URL points at the LangSmith deployment. Effort options re-render when the model changes; 'max' on Opus 4.7 is captured on the profile but ignored downstream until anthropic reasoning is wired through make_model. * feat: searchable Combobox for default repo picker Replaces the Select with a base-ui Combobox so users can filter by typing, the popup is wider than the trigger so full owner/repo names are readable, and the list caps at max-h-80 to stay on screen. * fix: address review comments + wire default_repo and Anthropic thinking Security/correctness fixes from PR review: * Open redirect: validate `redirect_to` in `/auth/login` against `DASHBOARD_BASE_URL` + `DASHBOARD_ALLOWED_ORIGINS` before signing it into the state JWT. Anything off-allowlist falls back to the dashboard base URL. (PR #1302 r3250054386) * Login CSRF: bind the OAuth `state` to the requesting browser. At `/auth/login` we generate a fresh nonce, set it as a short-lived HttpOnly SameSite=Lax cookie scoped to `/dashboard/api/auth`, and embed `hash_state_nonce(nonce)` in the state JWT. At `/auth/callback` we require the cookie nonce to hash-match the state JWT's nonce_hash (constant-time compare). (PR #1302 r3250054395) * RMW race in profile vs token writes: split storage into two namespaces — `["profiles"]` for user-editable settings and `["oauth_tokens"]` for the encrypted GitHub token. Each upsert now only writes its own namespace so an in-flight profile save can no longer clobber a fresh token from a concurrent re-login (and vice versa). (PR #1302 r3250054393) * /repos pagination: follow `Link: rel="next"` for both `/user/installations` and per-installation `/repositories` with per_page=100, capped at 1000 items. (PR #1302 r3250054401) Feature wires: * default_repo: applied as a fallback in `get_slack_repo_config` (after explicit-repo / thread metadata, before the env defaults) and in the Linear webhook (after comment-body extraction, before team mapping). Both paths resolve the triggering user's GitHub login via GITHUB_USER_EMAIL_MAP and read the profile's default_repo. * Anthropic "thinking" effort: `make_model` now accepts a `thinking` kwarg; `get_agent` maps profile effort {low,medium,high,xhigh,max} to budget_tokens {1k,4k,12k,32k,60k} when the chosen model is anthropic. OpenAI path still ignores "max" since the Literal doesn't accept it.
2026-05-15 11:23:53 -07:00
class AnthropicThinking(TypedDict, total=False):
type: AnthropicThinkingType
class ModelKwargs(TypedDict, total=False):
max_tokens: int | None
reasoning: OpenAIReasoning | None
feat: open-swe dashboard for per-user profile config (#1302) * feat: dashboard backend — GitHub OAuth, profile CRUD, admin endpoints Adds agent/dashboard/ FastAPI router mounted at /dashboard/api covering: - GitHub App OAuth login → JWT cookie session (cross-domain ready) - profile CRUD against LangGraph Store with model+effort validation - admin gate via CONFIGURED_ADMINS - /repos via /user/installations using the user's encrypted OAuth token CORS allowlist on webapp.py is opt-in via DASHBOARD_ALLOWED_ORIGINS so the Vercel-hosted frontend can call the LangSmith deployment with credentials. * feat: apply dashboard profile model/effort overrides in get_agent Look up the triggering user's GitHub login from config (direct field or GITHUB_USER_EMAIL_MAP reverse lookup), read their profile from the Store, and apply default_model + reasoning_effort to make_model when both are valid. Effort 'max' is captured on the profile but not yet wired through — the OpenAI Reasoning Literal doesn't accept it. * feat: ui/ TanStack Start dashboard for profile config Scaffolded with the shadcn b7CScJIjA preset (TanStack Start template, base-ui primitives, Tailwind v4). Three routes: - /login — Sign in with GitHub (links to /dashboard/api/auth/login) - /profile — Edit default model, reasoning effort, default repo - /admin — Admin-only: list users and edit other profiles API client (src/lib/api.ts) uses credentials: include so the osw_session cookie set by the OAuth callback rides cross-origin. VITE_DASHBOARD_API_BASE_URL points at the LangSmith deployment. Effort options re-render when the model changes; 'max' on Opus 4.7 is captured on the profile but ignored downstream until anthropic reasoning is wired through make_model. * feat: searchable Combobox for default repo picker Replaces the Select with a base-ui Combobox so users can filter by typing, the popup is wider than the trigger so full owner/repo names are readable, and the list caps at max-h-80 to stay on screen. * fix: address review comments + wire default_repo and Anthropic thinking Security/correctness fixes from PR review: * Open redirect: validate `redirect_to` in `/auth/login` against `DASHBOARD_BASE_URL` + `DASHBOARD_ALLOWED_ORIGINS` before signing it into the state JWT. Anything off-allowlist falls back to the dashboard base URL. (PR #1302 r3250054386) * Login CSRF: bind the OAuth `state` to the requesting browser. At `/auth/login` we generate a fresh nonce, set it as a short-lived HttpOnly SameSite=Lax cookie scoped to `/dashboard/api/auth`, and embed `hash_state_nonce(nonce)` in the state JWT. At `/auth/callback` we require the cookie nonce to hash-match the state JWT's nonce_hash (constant-time compare). (PR #1302 r3250054395) * RMW race in profile vs token writes: split storage into two namespaces — `["profiles"]` for user-editable settings and `["oauth_tokens"]` for the encrypted GitHub token. Each upsert now only writes its own namespace so an in-flight profile save can no longer clobber a fresh token from a concurrent re-login (and vice versa). (PR #1302 r3250054393) * /repos pagination: follow `Link: rel="next"` for both `/user/installations` and per-installation `/repositories` with per_page=100, capped at 1000 items. (PR #1302 r3250054401) Feature wires: * default_repo: applied as a fallback in `get_slack_repo_config` (after explicit-repo / thread metadata, before the env defaults) and in the Linear webhook (after comment-body extraction, before team mapping). Both paths resolve the triggering user's GitHub login via GITHUB_USER_EMAIL_MAP and read the profile's default_repo. * Anthropic "thinking" effort: `make_model` now accepts a `thinking` kwarg; `get_agent` maps profile effort {low,medium,high,xhigh,max} to budget_tokens {1k,4k,12k,32k,60k} when the chosen model is anthropic. OpenAI path still ignores "max" since the Literal doesn't accept it.
2026-05-15 11:23:53 -07:00
thinking: AnthropicThinking | None
effort: AnthropicEffort | None
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
thinking_level: GoogleThinkingLevel | None
temperature: float | None
max_retries: int | None
model_kwargs: dict[str, object] | None
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
_ANTHROPIC_EFFORTS: set[AnthropicEffort] = {"low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max"}
def make_model(model_id: str, **kwargs: Unpack[ModelKwargs]):
model_kwargs: dict[str, object] = kwargs.copy()
model_kwargs.setdefault("max_retries", DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES)
if model_id.startswith("openai:"):
model_kwargs["base_url"] = OPENAI_RESPONSES_WS_BASE_URL
model_kwargs["use_responses_api"] = True
return init_chat_model(model=model_id, **model_kwargs)
def fallback_model_id_for(primary_model_id: str) -> str | None:
"""Return the cross-provider fallback model id for a given primary, if any.
Anthropic primaries fall back to OpenAI and vice versa. Returns ``None``
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
when the provider has no configured cross-provider fallback (e.g. Google,
local, or self-hosted providers we don't want to silently route off-host).
"""
if primary_model_id.startswith("anthropic:"):
return "openai:gpt-5.5"
if primary_model_id.startswith("openai:"):
return "anthropic:claude-opus-4-5"
return None
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
def is_gemini_3_family(model_id: str) -> bool:
model_name = model_id.split(":", 1)[-1]
return model_name.startswith("gemini-3")
def openai_reasoning_for(
profile_effort: str | None,
*,
default_effort: OpenAIReasoningEffort | None = None,
) -> OpenAIReasoning | None:
"""Return an OpenAI reasoning kwarg from a profile effort string."""
effort = profile_effort or default_effort or DEFAULT_LLM_REASONING.get("effort")
if effort == "none":
return {"effort": "none"}
if effort == "low":
return {"effort": "low"}
if effort == "medium":
return {"effort": "medium"}
if effort == "high":
return {"effort": "high"}
if effort == "xhigh":
return {"effort": "xhigh"}
return None
def anthropic_thinking_for(profile_effort: str | None) -> AnthropicThinking | None:
if profile_effort in _ANTHROPIC_EFFORTS:
return {"type": "adaptive"}
return None
def anthropic_effort_for(profile_effort: str | None) -> AnthropicEffort | None:
if profile_effort in _ANTHROPIC_EFFORTS:
return profile_effort
return None
def fireworks_reasoning_effort_for(profile_effort: str | None) -> FireworksReasoningEffort | None:
"""Map profile effort to a Fireworks ``reasoning_effort`` value.
Fireworks' OpenAI-compatible API accepts ``reasoning_effort`` on its reasoning
models. ``none`` disables reasoning; ``xhigh``/``max`` are only honored by models
that advertise them (e.g. DeepSeek V4 Pro). The per-model ``efforts`` lists in
``dashboard/options.py`` gate which values can actually reach this function.
"""
if profile_effort == "none":
return "none"
if profile_effort == "low":
return "low"
if profile_effort == "medium":
return "medium"
if profile_effort == "high":
return "high"
if profile_effort == "xhigh":
return "xhigh"
if profile_effort == "max":
return "max"
return None
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
def google_thinking_level_for(profile_effort: str | None) -> GoogleThinkingLevel | None:
"""Map profile effort to Gemini 3+ ``thinking_level``."""
if profile_effort == "none":
return "minimal"
if profile_effort == "low":
return "low"
if profile_effort == "medium":
return "medium"
if profile_effort in ("high", "xhigh", "max"):
return "high"
return None
def provider_model_kwargs(
model_id: str,
profile_effort: str | None,
*,
max_tokens: int,
openai_reasoning_default: OpenAIReasoning | None = None,
) -> ModelKwargs:
"""Build provider-specific kwargs for ``make_model`` from a model id and effort."""
kwargs: ModelKwargs = {"max_tokens": max_tokens}
if model_id.startswith("openai:"):
reasoning = openai_reasoning_for(profile_effort)
if reasoning is not None:
kwargs["reasoning"] = reasoning
elif openai_reasoning_default is not None:
kwargs["reasoning"] = openai_reasoning_default
elif model_id.startswith("anthropic:"):
thinking = anthropic_thinking_for(profile_effort)
if thinking is not None:
kwargs["thinking"] = thinking
effort = anthropic_effort_for(profile_effort)
if effort is not None:
kwargs["effort"] = effort
elif model_id.startswith("google_genai:") and is_gemini_3_family(model_id):
thinking_level = google_thinking_level_for(profile_effort)
if thinking_level is not None:
kwargs["thinking_level"] = thinking_level
elif model_id.startswith("fireworks:"):
effort = fireworks_reasoning_effort_for(profile_effort)
if effort is not None:
kwargs["model_kwargs"] = {"reasoning_effort": effort}
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312) * feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>) before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns. Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall: - explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of defaulting to medium - ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436) - mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security, or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives - "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs - smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated / vendored / pure-rename hunks) Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next benchmark run. * trim prompt * subagent prompting * confidence ratings * added medium * enforce confidence threshold * . * reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor + failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26% style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new prompt targets each class directly. Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD, the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone. Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum, SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for FYI observations the dataset never rewards. * benchmax * adding google provider * slight steering * tuning * more tuning * fix * cleanup * reducing overfitting * Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer. Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository, edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients. Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
return kwargs