2026-04-28 15:03:21 -07:00
|
|
|
from typing import Literal, TypedDict, Unpack
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-03-02 12:13:24 -08:00
|
|
|
from langchain.chat_models import init_chat_model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPENAI_RESPONSES_WS_BASE_URL = "wss://api.openai.com/v1"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-05-08 15:35:13 -07:00
|
|
|
# Anthropic SDK default is 2; a 529 burst can outlive that. Bump to give the
|
|
|
|
|
# primary provider a fair chance before the fallback middleware kicks in.
|
|
|
|
|
DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES = 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt
Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the
finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki
auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>)
before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns.
Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall:
- explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of
defaulting to medium
- ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436)
- mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security,
or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives
- "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative
claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences
the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs
- smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated /
vendored / pure-rename hunks)
Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next
benchmark run.
* trim prompt
* subagent prompting
* confidence ratings
* added medium
* enforce confidence threshold
* .
* reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate
Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor +
failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file
list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a
checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden
set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26%
style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new
prompt targets each class directly.
Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but
no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent
self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility
bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the
confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval
target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone.
Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum,
SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for
FYI observations the dataset never rewards.
* benchmax
* adding google provider
* slight steering
* tuning
* more tuning
* fix
* cleanup
* reducing overfitting
* Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer.
Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository,
edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at
reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients.
Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
|
|
|
DEFAULT_LLM_REASONING: "OpenAIReasoning" = {"effort": "medium"}
|
2026-03-02 12:13:24 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-04-28 15:03:21 -07:00
|
|
|
OpenAIReasoningEffort = Literal["none", "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh"]
|
2026-05-18 15:47:13 -07:00
|
|
|
AnthropicThinkingType = Literal["adaptive"]
|
|
|
|
|
AnthropicEffort = Literal["low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max"]
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt
Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the
finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki
auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>)
before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns.
Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall:
- explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of
defaulting to medium
- ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436)
- mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security,
or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives
- "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative
claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences
the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs
- smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated /
vendored / pure-rename hunks)
Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next
benchmark run.
* trim prompt
* subagent prompting
* confidence ratings
* added medium
* enforce confidence threshold
* .
* reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate
Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor +
failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file
list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a
checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden
set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26%
style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new
prompt targets each class directly.
Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but
no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent
self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility
bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the
confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval
target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone.
Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum,
SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for
FYI observations the dataset never rewards.
* benchmax
* adding google provider
* slight steering
* tuning
* more tuning
* fix
* cleanup
* reducing overfitting
* Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer.
Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository,
edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at
reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients.
Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
|
|
|
GoogleThinkingLevel = Literal["minimal", "low", "medium", "high"]
|
2026-06-04 14:59:47 -07:00
|
|
|
FireworksReasoningEffort = Literal["none", "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max"]
|
2026-04-28 15:03:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class OpenAIReasoning(TypedDict, total=False):
|
|
|
|
|
effort: OpenAIReasoningEffort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: open-swe dashboard for per-user profile config (#1302)
* feat: dashboard backend — GitHub OAuth, profile CRUD, admin endpoints
Adds agent/dashboard/ FastAPI router mounted at /dashboard/api covering:
- GitHub App OAuth login → JWT cookie session (cross-domain ready)
- profile CRUD against LangGraph Store with model+effort validation
- admin gate via CONFIGURED_ADMINS
- /repos via /user/installations using the user's encrypted OAuth token
CORS allowlist on webapp.py is opt-in via DASHBOARD_ALLOWED_ORIGINS so the
Vercel-hosted frontend can call the LangSmith deployment with credentials.
* feat: apply dashboard profile model/effort overrides in get_agent
Look up the triggering user's GitHub login from config (direct field or
GITHUB_USER_EMAIL_MAP reverse lookup), read their profile from the Store,
and apply default_model + reasoning_effort to make_model when both are
valid. Effort 'max' is captured on the profile but not yet wired through —
the OpenAI Reasoning Literal doesn't accept it.
* feat: ui/ TanStack Start dashboard for profile config
Scaffolded with the shadcn b7CScJIjA preset (TanStack Start template,
base-ui primitives, Tailwind v4). Three routes:
- /login — Sign in with GitHub (links to /dashboard/api/auth/login)
- /profile — Edit default model, reasoning effort, default repo
- /admin — Admin-only: list users and edit other profiles
API client (src/lib/api.ts) uses credentials: include so the osw_session
cookie set by the OAuth callback rides cross-origin. VITE_DASHBOARD_API_BASE_URL
points at the LangSmith deployment.
Effort options re-render when the model changes; 'max' on Opus 4.7 is
captured on the profile but ignored downstream until anthropic reasoning
is wired through make_model.
* feat: searchable Combobox for default repo picker
Replaces the Select with a base-ui Combobox so users can filter by typing,
the popup is wider than the trigger so full owner/repo names are readable,
and the list caps at max-h-80 to stay on screen.
* fix: address review comments + wire default_repo and Anthropic thinking
Security/correctness fixes from PR review:
* Open redirect: validate `redirect_to` in `/auth/login` against
`DASHBOARD_BASE_URL` + `DASHBOARD_ALLOWED_ORIGINS` before signing it
into the state JWT. Anything off-allowlist falls back to the dashboard
base URL. (PR #1302 r3250054386)
* Login CSRF: bind the OAuth `state` to the requesting browser. At
`/auth/login` we generate a fresh nonce, set it as a short-lived
HttpOnly SameSite=Lax cookie scoped to `/dashboard/api/auth`, and
embed `hash_state_nonce(nonce)` in the state JWT. At `/auth/callback`
we require the cookie nonce to hash-match the state JWT's nonce_hash
(constant-time compare). (PR #1302 r3250054395)
* RMW race in profile vs token writes: split storage into two
namespaces — `["profiles"]` for user-editable settings and
`["oauth_tokens"]` for the encrypted GitHub token. Each upsert now
only writes its own namespace so an in-flight profile save can no
longer clobber a fresh token from a concurrent re-login (and vice
versa). (PR #1302 r3250054393)
* /repos pagination: follow `Link: rel="next"` for both
`/user/installations` and per-installation `/repositories` with
per_page=100, capped at 1000 items. (PR #1302 r3250054401)
Feature wires:
* default_repo: applied as a fallback in `get_slack_repo_config` (after
explicit-repo / thread metadata, before the env defaults) and in the
Linear webhook (after comment-body extraction, before team mapping).
Both paths resolve the triggering user's GitHub login via
GITHUB_USER_EMAIL_MAP and read the profile's default_repo.
* Anthropic "thinking" effort: `make_model` now accepts a `thinking`
kwarg; `get_agent` maps profile effort {low,medium,high,xhigh,max}
to budget_tokens {1k,4k,12k,32k,60k} when the chosen model is
anthropic. OpenAI path still ignores "max" since the Literal doesn't
accept it.
2026-05-15 11:23:53 -07:00
|
|
|
class AnthropicThinking(TypedDict, total=False):
|
|
|
|
|
type: AnthropicThinkingType
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-28 15:03:21 -07:00
|
|
|
class ModelKwargs(TypedDict, total=False):
|
|
|
|
|
max_tokens: int | None
|
|
|
|
|
reasoning: OpenAIReasoning | None
|
feat: open-swe dashboard for per-user profile config (#1302)
* feat: dashboard backend — GitHub OAuth, profile CRUD, admin endpoints
Adds agent/dashboard/ FastAPI router mounted at /dashboard/api covering:
- GitHub App OAuth login → JWT cookie session (cross-domain ready)
- profile CRUD against LangGraph Store with model+effort validation
- admin gate via CONFIGURED_ADMINS
- /repos via /user/installations using the user's encrypted OAuth token
CORS allowlist on webapp.py is opt-in via DASHBOARD_ALLOWED_ORIGINS so the
Vercel-hosted frontend can call the LangSmith deployment with credentials.
* feat: apply dashboard profile model/effort overrides in get_agent
Look up the triggering user's GitHub login from config (direct field or
GITHUB_USER_EMAIL_MAP reverse lookup), read their profile from the Store,
and apply default_model + reasoning_effort to make_model when both are
valid. Effort 'max' is captured on the profile but not yet wired through —
the OpenAI Reasoning Literal doesn't accept it.
* feat: ui/ TanStack Start dashboard for profile config
Scaffolded with the shadcn b7CScJIjA preset (TanStack Start template,
base-ui primitives, Tailwind v4). Three routes:
- /login — Sign in with GitHub (links to /dashboard/api/auth/login)
- /profile — Edit default model, reasoning effort, default repo
- /admin — Admin-only: list users and edit other profiles
API client (src/lib/api.ts) uses credentials: include so the osw_session
cookie set by the OAuth callback rides cross-origin. VITE_DASHBOARD_API_BASE_URL
points at the LangSmith deployment.
Effort options re-render when the model changes; 'max' on Opus 4.7 is
captured on the profile but ignored downstream until anthropic reasoning
is wired through make_model.
* feat: searchable Combobox for default repo picker
Replaces the Select with a base-ui Combobox so users can filter by typing,
the popup is wider than the trigger so full owner/repo names are readable,
and the list caps at max-h-80 to stay on screen.
* fix: address review comments + wire default_repo and Anthropic thinking
Security/correctness fixes from PR review:
* Open redirect: validate `redirect_to` in `/auth/login` against
`DASHBOARD_BASE_URL` + `DASHBOARD_ALLOWED_ORIGINS` before signing it
into the state JWT. Anything off-allowlist falls back to the dashboard
base URL. (PR #1302 r3250054386)
* Login CSRF: bind the OAuth `state` to the requesting browser. At
`/auth/login` we generate a fresh nonce, set it as a short-lived
HttpOnly SameSite=Lax cookie scoped to `/dashboard/api/auth`, and
embed `hash_state_nonce(nonce)` in the state JWT. At `/auth/callback`
we require the cookie nonce to hash-match the state JWT's nonce_hash
(constant-time compare). (PR #1302 r3250054395)
* RMW race in profile vs token writes: split storage into two
namespaces — `["profiles"]` for user-editable settings and
`["oauth_tokens"]` for the encrypted GitHub token. Each upsert now
only writes its own namespace so an in-flight profile save can no
longer clobber a fresh token from a concurrent re-login (and vice
versa). (PR #1302 r3250054393)
* /repos pagination: follow `Link: rel="next"` for both
`/user/installations` and per-installation `/repositories` with
per_page=100, capped at 1000 items. (PR #1302 r3250054401)
Feature wires:
* default_repo: applied as a fallback in `get_slack_repo_config` (after
explicit-repo / thread metadata, before the env defaults) and in the
Linear webhook (after comment-body extraction, before team mapping).
Both paths resolve the triggering user's GitHub login via
GITHUB_USER_EMAIL_MAP and read the profile's default_repo.
* Anthropic "thinking" effort: `make_model` now accepts a `thinking`
kwarg; `get_agent` maps profile effort {low,medium,high,xhigh,max}
to budget_tokens {1k,4k,12k,32k,60k} when the chosen model is
anthropic. OpenAI path still ignores "max" since the Literal doesn't
accept it.
2026-05-15 11:23:53 -07:00
|
|
|
thinking: AnthropicThinking | None
|
2026-05-18 15:47:13 -07:00
|
|
|
effort: AnthropicEffort | None
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt
Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the
finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki
auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>)
before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns.
Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall:
- explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of
defaulting to medium
- ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436)
- mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security,
or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives
- "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative
claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences
the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs
- smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated /
vendored / pure-rename hunks)
Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next
benchmark run.
* trim prompt
* subagent prompting
* confidence ratings
* added medium
* enforce confidence threshold
* .
* reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate
Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor +
failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file
list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a
checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden
set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26%
style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new
prompt targets each class directly.
Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but
no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent
self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility
bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the
confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval
target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone.
Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum,
SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for
FYI observations the dataset never rewards.
* benchmax
* adding google provider
* slight steering
* tuning
* more tuning
* fix
* cleanup
* reducing overfitting
* Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer.
Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository,
edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at
reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients.
Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
|
|
|
thinking_level: GoogleThinkingLevel | None
|
2026-04-28 15:03:21 -07:00
|
|
|
temperature: float | None
|
2026-05-08 15:35:13 -07:00
|
|
|
max_retries: int | None
|
2026-06-04 14:59:47 -07:00
|
|
|
model_kwargs: dict[str, object] | None
|
2026-04-28 15:03:21 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt
Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the
finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki
auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>)
before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns.
Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall:
- explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of
defaulting to medium
- ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436)
- mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security,
or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives
- "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative
claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences
the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs
- smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated /
vendored / pure-rename hunks)
Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next
benchmark run.
* trim prompt
* subagent prompting
* confidence ratings
* added medium
* enforce confidence threshold
* .
* reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate
Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor +
failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file
list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a
checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden
set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26%
style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new
prompt targets each class directly.
Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but
no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent
self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility
bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the
confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval
target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone.
Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum,
SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for
FYI observations the dataset never rewards.
* benchmax
* adding google provider
* slight steering
* tuning
* more tuning
* fix
* cleanup
* reducing overfitting
* Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer.
Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository,
edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at
reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients.
Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
|
|
|
_ANTHROPIC_EFFORTS: set[AnthropicEffort] = {"low", "medium", "high", "xhigh", "max"}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-04-28 15:03:21 -07:00
|
|
|
def make_model(model_id: str, **kwargs: Unpack[ModelKwargs]):
|
|
|
|
|
model_kwargs: dict[str, object] = kwargs.copy()
|
2026-05-08 15:35:13 -07:00
|
|
|
model_kwargs.setdefault("max_retries", DEFAULT_MAX_RETRIES)
|
2026-03-02 12:13:24 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if model_id.startswith("openai:"):
|
|
|
|
|
model_kwargs["base_url"] = OPENAI_RESPONSES_WS_BASE_URL
|
|
|
|
|
model_kwargs["use_responses_api"] = True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return init_chat_model(model=model_id, **model_kwargs)
|
2026-05-08 15:35:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def fallback_model_id_for(primary_model_id: str) -> str | None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Return the cross-provider fallback model id for a given primary, if any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthropic primaries fall back to OpenAI and vice versa. Returns ``None``
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt
Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the
finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki
auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>)
before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns.
Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall:
- explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of
defaulting to medium
- ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436)
- mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security,
or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives
- "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative
claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences
the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs
- smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated /
vendored / pure-rename hunks)
Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next
benchmark run.
* trim prompt
* subagent prompting
* confidence ratings
* added medium
* enforce confidence threshold
* .
* reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate
Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor +
failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file
list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a
checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden
set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26%
style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new
prompt targets each class directly.
Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but
no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent
self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility
bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the
confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval
target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone.
Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum,
SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for
FYI observations the dataset never rewards.
* benchmax
* adding google provider
* slight steering
* tuning
* more tuning
* fix
* cleanup
* reducing overfitting
* Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer.
Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository,
edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at
reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients.
Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
|
|
|
when the provider has no configured cross-provider fallback (e.g. Google,
|
|
|
|
|
local, or self-hosted providers we don't want to silently route off-host).
|
2026-05-08 15:35:13 -07:00
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
if primary_model_id.startswith("anthropic:"):
|
|
|
|
|
return "openai:gpt-5.5"
|
|
|
|
|
if primary_model_id.startswith("openai:"):
|
|
|
|
|
return "anthropic:claude-opus-4-5"
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt
Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the
finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki
auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>)
before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns.
Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall:
- explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of
defaulting to medium
- ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436)
- mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security,
or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives
- "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative
claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences
the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs
- smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated /
vendored / pure-rename hunks)
Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next
benchmark run.
* trim prompt
* subagent prompting
* confidence ratings
* added medium
* enforce confidence threshold
* .
* reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate
Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor +
failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file
list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a
checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden
set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26%
style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new
prompt targets each class directly.
Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but
no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent
self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility
bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the
confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval
target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone.
Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum,
SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for
FYI observations the dataset never rewards.
* benchmax
* adding google provider
* slight steering
* tuning
* more tuning
* fix
* cleanup
* reducing overfitting
* Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer.
Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository,
edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at
reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients.
Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def is_gemini_3_family(model_id: str) -> bool:
|
|
|
|
|
model_name = model_id.split(":", 1)[-1]
|
|
|
|
|
return model_name.startswith("gemini-3")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def openai_reasoning_for(
|
|
|
|
|
profile_effort: str | None,
|
|
|
|
|
*,
|
|
|
|
|
default_effort: OpenAIReasoningEffort | None = None,
|
|
|
|
|
) -> OpenAIReasoning | None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Return an OpenAI reasoning kwarg from a profile effort string."""
|
|
|
|
|
effort = profile_effort or default_effort or DEFAULT_LLM_REASONING.get("effort")
|
|
|
|
|
if effort == "none":
|
|
|
|
|
return {"effort": "none"}
|
|
|
|
|
if effort == "low":
|
|
|
|
|
return {"effort": "low"}
|
|
|
|
|
if effort == "medium":
|
|
|
|
|
return {"effort": "medium"}
|
|
|
|
|
if effort == "high":
|
|
|
|
|
return {"effort": "high"}
|
|
|
|
|
if effort == "xhigh":
|
|
|
|
|
return {"effort": "xhigh"}
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def anthropic_thinking_for(profile_effort: str | None) -> AnthropicThinking | None:
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort in _ANTHROPIC_EFFORTS:
|
|
|
|
|
return {"type": "adaptive"}
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def anthropic_effort_for(profile_effort: str | None) -> AnthropicEffort | None:
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort in _ANTHROPIC_EFFORTS:
|
|
|
|
|
return profile_effort
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-06-04 14:59:47 -07:00
|
|
|
def fireworks_reasoning_effort_for(profile_effort: str | None) -> FireworksReasoningEffort | None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Map profile effort to a Fireworks ``reasoning_effort`` value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fireworks' OpenAI-compatible API accepts ``reasoning_effort`` on its reasoning
|
|
|
|
|
models. ``none`` disables reasoning; ``xhigh``/``max`` are only honored by models
|
|
|
|
|
that advertise them (e.g. DeepSeek V4 Pro). The per-model ``efforts`` lists in
|
|
|
|
|
``dashboard/options.py`` gate which values can actually reach this function.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "none":
|
|
|
|
|
return "none"
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "low":
|
|
|
|
|
return "low"
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "medium":
|
|
|
|
|
return "medium"
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "high":
|
|
|
|
|
return "high"
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "xhigh":
|
|
|
|
|
return "xhigh"
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "max":
|
|
|
|
|
return "max"
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt
Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the
finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki
auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>)
before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns.
Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall:
- explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of
defaulting to medium
- ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436)
- mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security,
or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives
- "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative
claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences
the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs
- smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated /
vendored / pure-rename hunks)
Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next
benchmark run.
* trim prompt
* subagent prompting
* confidence ratings
* added medium
* enforce confidence threshold
* .
* reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate
Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor +
failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file
list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a
checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden
set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26%
style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new
prompt targets each class directly.
Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but
no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent
self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility
bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the
confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval
target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone.
Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum,
SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for
FYI observations the dataset never rewards.
* benchmax
* adding google provider
* slight steering
* tuning
* more tuning
* fix
* cleanup
* reducing overfitting
* Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer.
Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository,
edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at
reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients.
Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
|
|
|
def google_thinking_level_for(profile_effort: str | None) -> GoogleThinkingLevel | None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Map profile effort to Gemini 3+ ``thinking_level``."""
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "none":
|
|
|
|
|
return "minimal"
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "low":
|
|
|
|
|
return "low"
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort == "medium":
|
|
|
|
|
return "medium"
|
|
|
|
|
if profile_effort in ("high", "xhigh", "max"):
|
|
|
|
|
return "high"
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def provider_model_kwargs(
|
|
|
|
|
model_id: str,
|
|
|
|
|
profile_effort: str | None,
|
|
|
|
|
*,
|
|
|
|
|
max_tokens: int,
|
|
|
|
|
openai_reasoning_default: OpenAIReasoning | None = None,
|
|
|
|
|
) -> ModelKwargs:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Build provider-specific kwargs for ``make_model`` from a model id and effort."""
|
|
|
|
|
kwargs: ModelKwargs = {"max_tokens": max_tokens}
|
|
|
|
|
if model_id.startswith("openai:"):
|
|
|
|
|
reasoning = openai_reasoning_for(profile_effort)
|
|
|
|
|
if reasoning is not None:
|
|
|
|
|
kwargs["reasoning"] = reasoning
|
|
|
|
|
elif openai_reasoning_default is not None:
|
|
|
|
|
kwargs["reasoning"] = openai_reasoning_default
|
|
|
|
|
elif model_id.startswith("anthropic:"):
|
|
|
|
|
thinking = anthropic_thinking_for(profile_effort)
|
|
|
|
|
if thinking is not None:
|
|
|
|
|
kwargs["thinking"] = thinking
|
|
|
|
|
effort = anthropic_effort_for(profile_effort)
|
|
|
|
|
if effort is not None:
|
|
|
|
|
kwargs["effort"] = effort
|
|
|
|
|
elif model_id.startswith("google_genai:") and is_gemini_3_family(model_id):
|
|
|
|
|
thinking_level = google_thinking_level_for(profile_effort)
|
|
|
|
|
if thinking_level is not None:
|
|
|
|
|
kwargs["thinking_level"] = thinking_level
|
2026-06-04 14:59:47 -07:00
|
|
|
elif model_id.startswith("fireworks:"):
|
|
|
|
|
effort = fireworks_reasoning_effort_for(profile_effort)
|
|
|
|
|
if effort is not None:
|
|
|
|
|
kwargs["model_kwargs"] = {"reasoning_effort": effort}
|
feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt (#1312)
* feat: tune reviewer for precision — web/wiki tools + recalibrated prompt
Reviewer agent now has web_search, fetch_url, and http_request alongside the
finding tools, so it can verify library semantics and consult the DeepWiki
auto-generated wiki for public repos (https://deepwiki.com/<owner>/<repo>)
before flagging cross-file or architectural concerns.
Prompt rewritten to push precision over recall:
- explicit severity ladder pushing reviews toward bimodal high/low instead of
defaulting to medium
- ≤200-char description target (gold set averages ~186 chars; we were at ~436)
- mandatory docs / wiki / code lookup before flagging concurrency, security,
or perf — the three categories that dominated false positives
- "do not flag" list covering compiler/linter-catchable nits, speculative
claims without a concrete attacker/interleaving/scale, style preferences
the codebase doesn't share, and test-quality nits on non-test diffs
- smart file-selection guidance for large PRs (deprioritize generated /
vendored / pure-rename hunks)
Eval config switched to openai:gpt-5.5 + high reasoning effort for the next
benchmark run.
* trim prompt
* subagent prompting
* confidence ratings
* added medium
* enforce confidence threshold
* .
* reviewer: precision-tuned prompt + drop confidence gate
Rewrites the reviewer system prompt around a defensibility bar (anchor +
failure mode + maintainer wouldn't say "not a bug"), an explicit do-not-file
list (style nits, speculation, scope-policing, same-bug fan-out), and a
checklist of 10 bug archetypes drawn from a per-PR audit of the eval golden
set. The audit showed 145 FPs in the last eval split ~28% speculative, ~26%
style-nit, ~31% real-but-unscored (mostly same-archetype fan-out); the new
prompt targets each class directly.
Confidence is still recorded on every finding for post-hoc calibration but
no longer gates publication — the audit showed the gate was a no-op (agent
self-rated 65% of findings "high" regardless), and the prompt's defensibility
bar is the actual discipline. Drops CONFIDENCE_ORDER, CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
the confidence_threshold kwarg on filter_findings_for_publish, the
confidence_filtered score_mode, and the min_confidence kwarg on the eval
target's _extract_comments — all dead once the gate is gone.
Also removes the "informational" severity tier from the Severity enum,
SEVERITY_ORDER, and all validators / tests / docstrings. It was reserved for
FYI observations the dataset never rewards.
* benchmax
* adding google provider
* slight steering
* tuning
* more tuning
* fix
* cleanup
* reducing overfitting
* Add per-repo review style profiles and inject them into the reviewer.
Dashboard users can analyze historical PR review feedback per repository,
edit the resulting style guide, and have it loaded from LangGraph Store at
reviewer runtime (including Martian eval runs) keyed by owner/name.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Fix review style job errors leaking exception details to clients.
Return generic dashboard messages while logging full stack traces server-side.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: open-swe[bot] <open-swe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-20 11:35:00 -07:00
|
|
|
return kwargs
|